RoboValue: A Fine-Grained Sim-and-Real Benchmark for Unified Evaluation of Robotic Value Models
Abstract
RoboValue introduces a benchmark to evaluate robotic value models across task-state understanding, progress tracking, failure recovery, and consistency in both simulated and real-world settings.
Robotic value models assess task execution from visual observations and instructions, providing feedback for policy learning and execution monitoring. However, existing evaluations cover only selected aspects of execution understanding, leaving the reliability of value feedback insufficiently tested. We introduce RoboValue, a fine-grained sim-and-real benchmark for unified evaluation of robotic value models. Its framework evaluates four complementary capability dimensions through shared interfaces: task-state understanding, temporal progress monitoring, failure and recovery reasoning, and value consistency. Diagnostic trajectories and instruction variations test whether value judgments accurately reflect task requirements and changes throughout execution. RoboValue-Dataset covers 15 simulation and 20 real-world manipulation tasks, providing expert demonstrations for training and annotated trajectories for fine-grained evaluation. We evaluate representative robotic value models in zero-shot and one-shot settings under standard conditions and separate shifts in robot embodiment and environment. Our results reveal errors in fine-grained instruction grounding, history-dependent progress tracking, and recovery assessment, even in models with strong outcome and forward-progress scores. The same semantic subtask can also receive substantially different value gains across valid execution orders. These findings identify concrete targets for value supervision, while the dataset and public leaderboard support continued assessment of feedback reliability. The website is available at https://robovalue-benchmark.github.io/.
Community
We introduce RoboValue, a fine-grained sim-and-real benchmark for unified evaluation of robotic value models. It evaluates four complementary capabilities: task-state understanding, temporal progress monitoring, failure and recovery reasoning, and value consistency. RoboValue covers 15 simulation and 20 real-world manipulation tasks. Our Zero-Shot and One-Shot evaluations reveal limitations in instruction grounding, execution-history awareness, recovery assessment, and consistent subtask credit. All four Full-Shot and One-Shot training subsets are publicly available in LeRobot v3.0 format.
Project page: robovalue-benchmark.github.io
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper