Papers
arxiv:2610.27364

Predictive Closure: A Set-Level Characterization of JEPA's Feature Selection

Published on Oct 19
· Submitted by
Mosh Levy
on Oct 26
Authors:
,

Abstract

JEPA feature selection depends on predictive relationships between features rather than individual predictability, allowing unpredictable but relationally useful features to be retained and enabling indirect steering of representations.

In joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPA), an encoder and a predictor are trained together to produce a representation that minimizes the error in predicting the representation of the next observation. Because the representations of both the current and the next observation are learned, it is unclear which features they will include. Earlier characterizations describe the features JEPA selects in terms of their individual predictability, raising the concern that unpredictable features, like a traffic light, will not be encoded into the representation. However, the prediction error is also affected by the relationships between features, e.g., the light's color helps predict whether the traffic will stop. We propose the predictive closure characterization, which accounts for these relationships. Based on a reformulation of the JEPA training objective, we show that selection depends on properties of feature sets. This view agrees with earlier works when features evolve independently, but makes new predictions when they do not, for instance that a feature like the traffic light can still be retained. We test this characterization in controlled experiments, which show that unpredictable features can become better represented when they help predict other features, and that changing one feature's predictive relationships can affect how well others are represented. We also demonstrate implications for steering feature selection: targeting one feature with an auxiliary objective, or supplying it to the predictor as side information, can strengthen the representation of another feature whose future values it helps predict, so steering can be indirect.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

JEPA doesn't just keep features that are predictable on their own. It keeps sets of features that predict each other. We formalize this as predictive closure, show it explains when unpredictable features are represented, and show you can steer what gets encoded indirectly through related features.

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.27364
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.27364 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.27364 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.27364 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.