Abstract
EvaOmni is an evidence-grounded benchmark that evaluates whether omnimodal language models identify audio-visual evidence and construct reasoning chains for audiovisual questions.
Omni LLMs can naturally locate key audio and visual evidence and integrate information across modalities for audiovisual reasoning. Existing audio-visual reasoning benchmarks that mainly rely on multiple-choice questions usually score models solely based on answer correctness, making it difficult to assess whether a model truly forms a reasoning chain from evidence to the correct answer. In addition, textual or unimodal shortcuts may allow models to answer correctly without analyzing the necessary audio-visual evidence, further weakening the reliability of evaluation benchmarks. To address these issues, we introduce EvaOmni, an evidence-grounded benchmark containing 392 videos and 1,027 purely human-annotated question-answer pairs, covering 15 capabilities and three levels: retrieval and localization, basic understanding, and complex reasoning. We design a series of rigorous annotation procedures in which experts annotate audio and visual evidence and construct video-based distractors; humans review whether questions meet strict inspection criteria, and finally models filter textual and unimodal shortcuts. Beyond high-quality question-answer pairs, we require models to simultaneously return the answer and supporting evidence intervals in order to evaluate the complete reasoning chain. We propose the Coverage Grounded Score (C.G.) to measure how much annotated evidence a model identifies, and the Bottleneck Grounded Score (B.G.) to penalize poor temporal localization in either modality; both are incorporated into answer correctness. Across 7 open-weight and 17 proprietary Omni LLMs, Gemini3.7-Flash achieved the highest overall accuracy (79.4%), C.G. (70.8%), and B.G. (35.1%). At Level 3, it reached 79.1% accuracy, but its B.G. was only 12.3%. These results show that even the most advanced models still have room for development in grounded audio-visual reasoning.
Community
Hi everyone! 👋
I’m an author of EvaOmni: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Audio-Visual Reasoning. We’re excited to share our work with the Hugging Face community!
In this paper, we address the challenge of evaluating whether models’ answers are grounded in relevant audio and visual evidence.
Key Contributions:
- An evidence-grounded benchmark: EvaOmni contains 1,027 human-annotated question-answer pairs from 392 videos, covering 15 capabilities across 3 levels, from retrieval and grounding to complex reasoning.
- Joint evaluation of answers and evidence: Models must provide both an answer and supporting audio and visual evidence intervals. We introduce Coverage Grounded Score (C.G.) and Bottleneck Grounded Score (B.G.) to evaluate answer correctness together with evidence coverage and temporal localization.
- Rigorous quality control: Expert annotation, human cross-validation, and text-only, audio-only, and visual-only screening help reduce shortcut susceptibility.
Links & Resources:
- 📄 Paper: arXiv:2610.28444
- 💻 Code & Evaluation: GitHub
- 🤗 Huggingface: Hugging Face
- 📦 Model Scope: ModelScope
We’re actively monitoring this thread, so please feel free to ask questions, leave feedback, or share your thoughts. We’d love to hear from you! 🚀
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.28444 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper