Papers
arxiv:2610.30108

Multimodal Embodied Agents: A Unified Capability-centric Perspective from Computer-Use to Robot-Use

Published on Oct 21
· Submitted by
YanzheChen
on Oct 22
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

PAPAV defines five core capabilities for multimodal embodied agents and highlights gaps in evaluation and physical constraints when moving from digital to robotic settings.

Multimodal agents (MMAs) sustain interaction through reasoning, memory, tools, and feedback, most visibly as computer-use agents, while robotic systems (RSs) couple sensing and actuation under physical dynamics. We define multimodal embodied agents (MMEAs) as goal-directed systems that couple multimodal task reasoning with physical action and revise decisions from the resulting feedback. This raises a central question: what changes when a multimodal agent moves from computer-use to robot-use? We introduce PAPAV, a unified capability-centric framework of five recurring functions: Perceive the current state, Anticipate action effects, Plan a feasible course, Act through an interface or body, and Verify the outcome. Defined by function rather than architecture, these capabilities let PAPAV identify what all three share and then compare MMEAs with MMAs and with RSs. Five physical constraints, from partial observability to unverifiable outcomes, leave fewer choices fixed in advance and less room to reverse errors. Across 64 benchmarks, explicit evaluation centers on Act; only 5 assess Anticipate and 3 assess Verify, leaving both largely hidden behind task success. These constraints also frame the open challenges we identify. PAPAV therefore provides a common basis for designing reliable physical agents and measuring progress across all five capabilities rather than task success alone.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

What changes when a multimodal agent moves from computer-use to robot-use?

We introduce PAPAV — Perceive, Anticipate, Plan, Act, Verify — a capability-centric framework for understanding Multimodal Embodied Agents across digital and physical interaction.

Our analysis of 64 benchmarks reveals a clear gap: evaluation is heavily concentrated on Act, while Anticipate and Verify remain largely underexplored.

We hope this survey provides a unified map of the emerging Agent + Robot landscape and a useful basis for future research.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.30108
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.30108 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.30108 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.30108 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.