Abstract
SearchHorizonBench evaluates how agents learn to estimate the value of additional search from execution history, showing that historical calibration improves prediction accuracy but leaves most search-gain variance unexplained.
AI agents must decide when another search is worth its cost. Answer-success probabilities capture question difficulty, while this decision requires estimating the additional benefit of search. We introduce SearchHorizonBench, a benchmark for learning and evaluating search value from execution experience. Paired continuations and repeated executions separate expected search gain from generation noise and connect prediction quality to decision utility. The resource contains 45,632 executions across 3,168 questions. On 1,632 held-out questions, historical calibration reduces Brier error by 16.2%, with the improvement concentrated in success-level information. Search gains have a standard deviation of 21.4 percentage points, and tested historical estimators explain less than 2% of this variance in point estimates. Matched-configuration learning curves probe this distinction across training scales. At the reference token price, free selection observations yield a 2.49-point utility opportunity over the best constant action, driven primarily by gain information. Reusable histories, frozen splits, strong baselines and scoring tools provide a common foundation for developing and evaluating value-aware search agents.
Community
A Benchmark for Search Value in AI Agents
Separating how hard a question is from how much one more search would help is a useful split. An estimator faces the same call on every bid: is one more supplier quote worth the day it costs? I'd be curious whether the unexplained variance shrinks when the agent can see what its previous search actually returned.
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.34714 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper