AskStream: When and What to Ask Proactively under Uncertainty in Streaming Video Understanding
Abstract
Proactive video understanding should include asking for missing information under uncertainty, and the AskStream benchmark reveals current models struggle with this decision.
Recent advances in multimodal large language models have increased interest in interaction paradigms for video understanding. The evolution from offline to streaming and proactive interaction has gradually shifted models from passive responders toward more proactive agents that can decide when to answer. However, existing proactive paradigms typically assume that the information required to answer a query is complete, leaving models to only wait or answer. In the real world, however, information is often incomplete due to uncertainty from either the video or the user. In proactive paradigms, such uncertainty can cause the model to wait forever or generate highly hallucinatory responses. We therefore argue that proactive interaction should be redefined with a third action: ask, allowing models to actively ask for missing information. To study when and what models should ask before answering, we introduce AskStream, the first multi-turn benchmark spanning video and user uncertainty for streaming video understanding, with four task categories and eight subtasks. It contains 438 videos with 2,714 manually annotated frame-level time windows across three types: wait, ask, and answer. Across both multiple-choice and open-ended settings, even the strongest model attains only 52.18% on our proposed Ask-F1 metric, highlighting substantial limitations in proactive information seeking under uncertainty.
Community
Recent advances in multimodal large language models have increased interest in interaction paradigms for video understanding. The evolution from offline to streaming and proactive interaction has gradually shifted models from passive responders toward more proactive agents that can decide when to answer. However, existing proactive paradigms typically assume that the information required to answer a query is complete, leaving models to only wait or answer. In the real world, however, information is often incomplete due to uncertainty from either the video or the user. In proactive paradigms, such uncertainty can cause the model to wait forever or generate highly hallucinatory responses. We therefore argue that proactive interaction should be redefined with a third action: ask, allowing models to actively ask for missing information. To study when and what models should ask before answering, we introduce AskStream, the first multi-turn benchmark spanning video and user uncertainty for streaming video understanding, with four task categories and eight subtasks. It contains 438 videos with 2,714 manually annotated frame-level time windows across three types: wait, ask, and answer. Across both multiple-choice and open-ended settings, even the strongest model attains only 52.18% on our proposed Ask-F1 metric, highlighting substantial limitations in proactive information seeking under uncertainty.
Excellent work! My friends and I were just discussing yesterday how important it is for agents to proactively ask users questions when information or intent is unclear. I especially appreciate how AskStream makes asking an explicit action alongside waiting and answering, and evaluates both when to ask and what to ask. Covering uncertainty about user intent and preferences alongside missing visual evidence makes the benchmark particularly compelling.
Thank you so much for your words and thoughtful feedback!
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- DIVE: Benchmarking Full-Duplex Interaction with Visual Engagement in Continuous Streams (2026)
- Watch-Think-Interact: Bootstrapping Long-Horizon Multi-Turn Streaming Video Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning (2026)
- From Perception to Prediction and Intervention: Benchmarking Proactive Video Assistants in Real-Life Scenarios (2026)
- SyncPro: Synchronous Reasoning and Responding for Proactive Streaming Video Understanding (2026)
- APM-Bench: Benchmarking Cross-session Persistent Memory for Egocentric Streaming Video Assistants (2026)
- FastBench: Can Streaming VLMs Perceive High-Dynamic Real-World Streams? (2026)
- LiveProBench: Can Streaming Video Models Really Interact Like Humans? (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper