Papers
arxiv:2610.39671

Incentivizing Self-Learning in Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning

Published on Oct 29
· Submitted by
Lingkai Kong
on Nov 12
#1 Paper of the day
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) draw on parametric knowledge and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to solve knowledge-intensive tasks. Yet problem solving in unfamiliar domains calls for tightly coupled knowledge acquisition and reasoning, beyond factual retrieval and aggregation or learning solely from a preassembled context. We study self-learning -- autonomously retrieving, studying, and applying knowledge from long-form reference materials on the fly. To investigate this capability, we formulate a textbook-based mathematical problem-solving task. LLMs must navigate textbook exposition, learn and apply relevant principles, and construct proofs for exercises, with reference solutions withheld. We introduce a BookNavigator interface to support this human-inspired study process and incentivize self-learning through reinforcement learning (RL) with fine-grained rewards. Experiments show that our method improves performance across in-domain and out-of-domain textbooks and subjects, raising Intern-S2-Preview-35B's overall proof accuracy from 51.5% to 79.5% and outperforming RL-trained textbook-free and fixed-retrieval baselines. These gains extend to complex long-context benchmarks involving different task types, with improvements over the base model of 1.7 and 2.3 percentage points on BrowseComp-Plus and CL-bench, respectively. Together, these findings suggest that RL can foster a domain-agnostic self-learning strategy, highlighting the potential of self-learning from long-form corpora to strengthen broader problem-solving capabilities on complex, long-context tasks.

Community

We study self-learning—autonomously retrieving, studying, and applying knowledge from long-form reference materials on the fly.

Paper submitter
•
This comment has been hidden

Navigating a textbook with the reference solutions withheld is much closer to how people learn a new subject than plain retrieval. I like that the BookNavigator interface rewards the study process in fine-grained steps, not only the final proof. Did the models learn to revisit earlier chapters, or mostly read forward?

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.39671
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.39671 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.39671 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.39671 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.