When Morphs Look Better: Face Image Quality as a Training-Free Signal for Morphing Attack Detection
Abstract
Face image quality assessment methods vary widely in detecting diffusion-based and other morphing attacks, with performance depending heavily on attack type and dataset, and high quality scores for morphs often indicate poor detection.
Face image quality assessment (FIQA) estimates the utility of a face image for automated face recognition and has been proposed as a morphing attack detection (MAD) signal that requires no morph-specific training. We evaluate 17 FIQA methods from all current FIQA categories on 20 morphing attack sets from two datasets, FRLL and FEI, including five diffusion-based attack sets. Each quality score is used directly as a MAD decision score. Unlike prior work, which inverted a quality measure when this lowered its error, we fix the score direction of each method in advance from its definition, so that cases in which morphs receive higher quality than bona fide samples remain visible. On FRLL, DifFIQA(R) achieves a mean D-EER of 11.42%, and together with CLIB-FIQA and eDifFIQA(L) clearly outperforms all other FIQA methods. A strong separation of bona fide and morph scores does not imply good detection performance: on the diffusion-based attacks, up to 11 of 17 methods assign higher quality to morphs than to bona fide samples, and the largest reversed separation in the study coincides with the worst detection result of the study. Performance also depends strongly on the attack: GraFIQs(L), the best detector of DCMorph and Arc2Morph on FRLL, performs poorly on the landmark-based and GAN-based attacks. On FEI, the lowest mean D-EER is 39.75%, and a threshold set on the bona fide data of one dataset does not transfer to the other.
Community
Face image quality assessment (FIQA) estimates the utility of a face image for face recognition and is trained without morphs. We evaluate 17 FIQA methods from all current FIQA categories as training-free single-image morphing attack detection (MAD) scores on 20 morphing attack sets from two datasets, FRLL and FEI, including five diffusion-based attack sets.
- Each quality score is used directly as the MAD decision score. Only a threshold is set, on bona fide images.
- The score direction of each method is fixed in advance from its definition and never chosen per attack, so that cases in which morphs receive higher quality than bona fide images remain visible.
- A signed separation reports both the strength and the direction of the score shift caused by morphing.
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2611.00074 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper