Papers
arxiv:2611.12309

Efficient sensitivity analysis for combustion problems via reformulation and adjoint methods

Published on Nov 9
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Numerical simulations of combustion processes rely on chemical kinetic models, whose predictive capability is typically assessed by comparing measurements of quantities of interest (QoIs) in idealized experimental configurations with the corresponding simulated values. Sensitivity analysis quantifies the influence of model parameters on QoIs, making it a key tool for model development and optimization. Given the large number of parameters involved in detailed kinetic models compared to the number of QoIs, adjoint methods are a promising approach for efficient sensitivity analysis. Ignition delay times (IDTs) and extinction strain rates (ESRs) are among the QoIs of primary importance. However, applying adjoint methods to these quantities is not straightforward and is addressed in this work. The system of governing equations is reformulated via a coordinate transformation that makes the QoI an explicit component of the solution vector. This reformulation enables the application of adjoint sensitivity analysis for both IDT and ESR. A computational complexity analysis demonstrates that the proposed formulation significantly improves algorithmic efficiency compared to conventional approaches. The methodology is verified by comparing adjoint sensitivity coefficients with those obtained from other methods. Execution time measurements show computational cost reductions of up to two orders of magnitude relative to standard direct sensitivity analysis. A benchmark study is conducted across kinetic models of increasing size to assess how far theoretical efficiency gains are realized in practice. While the results show that implementation details can limit performance for smaller problem sizes, the expected asymptotic scaling is observed for larger models. The benchmark thus provides a reference framework for identifying key performance bottlenecks and guiding subsequent optimization efforts.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2611.12309
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.12309 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.12309 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.12309 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.