Papers
arxiv:2611.13442

ForeSpark: Joint Draft and Verification Budget Scheduling for Parallel Speculative Decoding

Published on Nov 10
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

ForeSpark jointly allocates per-request draft and verification budgets in LLM serving to improve throughput and load tolerance without altering the output distribution.

Parallel drafters accelerate LLM decoding by proposing a whole block of draft tokens in a single forward pass, making them attractive for LLM serving. Recent systems optimize goodput (i.e., accepted tokens per second) because rejected drafts steal compute from other requests. However, these systems control only how many tokens are verified, so every request still drafts a full block. At high serving load, we find that drafting consumes up to 40% of step time, of which a majority is discarded because it is never verified. Yet, draft-length control from autoregressive drafters does not carry over, because a parallel drafter commits to its length before its single pass. Moreover, draft and verification lengths are coupled across the batch, so they must be selected jointly for every request while keeping the decision computationally cheap at every step. In this paper, we propose work-conserving speculation (WCS), a design that jointly allocates draft and verification budgets per request in LLM serving, and present ForeSpark as its prototype. ForeSpark realizes WCS with (i) a context-aware pre-draft estimator that predicts acceptance for every candidate length from the target model's context features, (ii) a lightweight joint draft-verify scheduler that selects both lengths through a global sort, and (iii) a post-draft budget distribution that spends verification on the most promising tokens. Implemented on vLLM, ForeSpark improves throughput by up to 1.77x over the state-of-the-art DSpark and by 2.49x over autoregressive decoding at a matched per-request generation rate, without changing the output distribution. It also tolerates higher load, sustaining up to 1.51x the request rate of DSpark under latency service level objectives (SLOs).

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2611.13442
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.13442 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.13442 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.13442 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.