Papers
arxiv:2611.16748

PhysLoop: Harnessing LLMs' Physics Awareness for Self-Improving Video Generation Models

Published on Nov 12
ยท Submitted by
yuxuan chen
on Nov 13
#3 Paper of the day
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

PhysLoop leverages large language models to guide video generation, selection, and correction, enabling physically consistent self-improvement and controllable data construction for video models.

Video generation models produce visually realistic videos but still struggle with physical dynamics and causal consistency. Learning from generated videos requires fine-grained physical supervision, yet reliable quality judgments, correction pairs, and controlled variations are difficult to obtain. Large language models (LLMs) possess physical knowledge, but struggle to reliably guide video generation models in producing their training videos. We present PhysLoop, a unified harness designed to support physically grounded self-improvement in video generation models. The harness guides and constrains LLMs throughout video generation, selection, and correction, distilling their physical knowledge into physically consistent videos. The framework supports controllable training-data construction and inference-time video repair. By identifying and correcting failures, PhysLoop marks a key milestone toward recursive self-improvement (RSI) in video generation models with limited human intervention. We release 100K videos spanning diverse, realistic indoor and outdoor scenes, along with generation tools and two evaluation datasets: PhysLoop-Gen and PhysLoop-Repair. We evaluate controllable generation and localized repair on these datasets, respectively, and assess physical behavior on the external Physics-IQ Verified benchmark.

Community

Paper submitter

PhysLoop is a physics-aware harness for building controllable video training data and repairing physically inconsistent video at inference time. The project video shows how the harness works and presents examples of video generation and repair. Code release is pending company policy review.

Hi authors, thanks for the work. A question on Table 1: the caption says Win comes from 301 unblinded comparisons by one author, while Section 5.2 describes blinded multi-rater judgments, and six of the nine Repair rates are not multiples of 2% on 50 tasks. Details in this GitHub issue: https://github.com/DAGroup-PKU/PhysLoop/issues/1

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2611.16748
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.16748 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.16748 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.16748 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.