Daily Papers

The study of the attribution of input features to the output of neural network models is an active area of research. While numerous Explainable AI (XAI) techniques have been proposed to interpret these models, the systematic and automated evaluation of these methods in sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) models is less explored. This paper introduces a new approach for evaluating explainability methods in transformer-based seq2seq models. We use teacher-derived attribution maps as a structured side signal to guide a student model, and quantify the utility of different attribution methods through the student's ability to simulate targets. Using the Inseq library, we extract attribution scores over source-target sequence pairs and inject these scores into the attention mechanism of a student transformer model under four composition operators (addition, multiplication, averaging, and replacement). Across three language pairs (de-en, fr-en, ar-en) and attributions from Marian-MT and mBART models, Attention, Value Zeroing, and Layer Gradient times Activation consistently yield the largest gains in BLEU (and corresponding improvements in chrF) relative to baselines. In contrast, other gradient-based methods (Saliency, Integrated Gradients, DeepLIFT, Input times Gradient, GradientShap) lead to smaller and less consistent improvements. These results suggest that different attribution methods capture distinct signals and that attention-derived attributions better capture alignment between source and target representations in seq2seq models. Finally, we introduce an Attributor transformer that, given a source-target pair, learns to reconstruct the teacher's attribution map. Our findings demonstrate that the more accurately the Attributor can reproduce attribution maps, the more useful an injection of those maps is for the downstream task. The source code can be found on GitHub.

An important and unresolved problem in the physical sciences is explaining the predictions made by neural networks. Several explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods have been proposed to address this problem, including gradient XAI, Integrated Gradients, and GradientSHAP. We evaluate the baseline XAI methods according to four scores: sensitivity (XAI patterns strongly affect predictions), attribution (XAI patterns reproduce the change in prediction relative to a baseline), robustness (XAI patterns remain stable for nearby inputs), and coherence (XAI patterns are spatially smooth). We also introduce a new method, average gradient outer product (AGOP) XAI, that uses global gradient information to identify an important direction for a specific input. We apply XAI to neural network predictions of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) based on data from the Zebiak-Cane model. AGOP XAI achieves the highest attribution, robustness, and coherence scores in the architecture and lead-time comparisons reported here. Its sensitivity is surpassed by gradient XAI, which is maximally sensitive by definition. Beyond diagnosing neural-network behavior, AGOP XAI can generate candidate hypotheses about physical mechanisms. The method highlights an equatorial thermocline-depth signal consistent with recharge oscillator physics, together with a southeastern-Pacific lobe that may be specific to the Zebiak-Cane model. Finally, we test the physical relevance of AGOP using optimized perturbations that move the Zebiak-Cane model along AGOP explanation coordinates. Such perturbations can suppress the selected extreme events or, from a near-neutral ensemble, generate strong El Niño or La Niña events 10 months later.