Post
91
The post-beatrix-2s and control variant article is finally satisfactory, so the article is now released https://huggingface.co/blog/AbstractPhil/beatrix-ft2
The control variant will need another train with better SDPA stabilization, as the control variant destabilized and collapsed. The primary fault is the lack of QK normalization, which caused the model to simply collapse given enough time. Claude lists the rest of the suspected reasons in the article.
This was a very difficult series of experiments to tune with many fault points. Trying to make heads or tails of Fable 5.1 Claude-speak hasn't been the easiest task either. It seems the model is more likely to create pedantically rigid responses rather than cooperative. Not necessarily insulting, but definitely a sort of refrigerator-magnet behavior - treating my individual contributions as little sketches for the refrigerator. This often completely ignores my larger MD or complex behavioral instructions in favor of my theoretical or hypothetical - likely considering the MD and technical as the model's own, rather than my direct contributions. Right there... right on the refrigerator goes my hypothesis that worked.
https://github.com/AbstractEyes/geolip-bytelex
In any case, this upcoming week will be related entirely to cross-tokenizer distillation research. It may stretch long beyond the next week, but as it stands the geometric vocabulary has evolved into a codebook prediction system.
I would like to give this program linear wings. The Beatrix model supports it, but how well is up for this week to decide.
There are a multitude of potentials based on a series of very recent articles I will be exploring, providing the necessary bytelex complexity to a roughly 60 hour battery of experiments and trainings throughout the geometric systems.
The results will determine the best and worst methodologies of using these models, these shapes, and these structures with more complex byte-level cross tokenization systems
The control variant will need another train with better SDPA stabilization, as the control variant destabilized and collapsed. The primary fault is the lack of QK normalization, which caused the model to simply collapse given enough time. Claude lists the rest of the suspected reasons in the article.
This was a very difficult series of experiments to tune with many fault points. Trying to make heads or tails of Fable 5.1 Claude-speak hasn't been the easiest task either. It seems the model is more likely to create pedantically rigid responses rather than cooperative. Not necessarily insulting, but definitely a sort of refrigerator-magnet behavior - treating my individual contributions as little sketches for the refrigerator. This often completely ignores my larger MD or complex behavioral instructions in favor of my theoretical or hypothetical - likely considering the MD and technical as the model's own, rather than my direct contributions. Right there... right on the refrigerator goes my hypothesis that worked.
https://github.com/AbstractEyes/geolip-bytelex
In any case, this upcoming week will be related entirely to cross-tokenizer distillation research. It may stretch long beyond the next week, but as it stands the geometric vocabulary has evolved into a codebook prediction system.
I would like to give this program linear wings. The Beatrix model supports it, but how well is up for this week to decide.
There are a multitude of potentials based on a series of very recent articles I will be exploring, providing the necessary bytelex complexity to a roughly 60 hour battery of experiments and trainings throughout the geometric systems.
The results will determine the best and worst methodologies of using these models, these shapes, and these structures with more complex byte-level cross tokenization systems