Join the conversation

Join the community of Machine Learners and AI enthusiasts.

Sign Up
dleemillerΒ 
posted an update 4 days ago
Post
2,410
Join the competition!

We have 45 models scored (and growing), across 44 public benchmarks. My goal for this space is to push the limits on NLI and the breadth of tasks these models can perform in. Contributions are encouraged, as well as suggestions for additional benchmarks.

Right now, all models are cross encoders (Sentence Transformers πŸ₯°), but LLMs are welcome too!



dleemiller/open-nli-leaderboard

This is a great resource for the SLM community! Cross-encoders are often overlooked in small-model discussions because everyone focuses on causal LMs, but a well-tuned 20-50M cross-encoder can punch well above its weight on NLI and retrieval tasks.

One thing I've noticed working with sub-100M models: positional encoding choices matter enormously at that scale. If you're accepting LLM contributions, even a tiny 5M-param encoder with RoPE vs learned absolute positions can shift NLI accuracy by several points on short premises/hypotheses.

Would love to see a row for a distilled MiniLM-style model or a from-scratch 10M cross-encoder. Happy to help benchmark if you want a second pair of eyes on task formatting. πŸ€—

Β·

I've trained the ettin 17m model, but that's still a bidirectional model. I am working on training larger causal models right now, but I can give a tiny one a shot! I have a 10M param model I've trained on about 50B tokens but I haven't done anything with it yet.

The parenthesized replacements make declared test-set training overlap visible. For comparing a few models, a companion view using only their shared benchmarks without that overlap would be useful alongside the imputed scores. It would separate directly measured comparisons from the kNN and z-score estimates, while making the reduced dataset coverage explicit.

Β·

Good suggestions, I'll see what I can come up with.