File size: 16,006 Bytes
b68816f | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 | """Compose a `DomainContext` from a company's persisted entries (V4-5..V4-7).
Reads `knowledge_entries` and joins glossary -> formula -> rules into measures.
**Nothing here calls a model.** Every field this module produces already exists
in the database; composition is a join, which is what makes it verifiable and
free to run.
The declared half of the context (identity, boundary, conventions, entities,
dimensions) is NOT produced here - it is authored through the review loop
(decided 2026-09-08: the model proposes, the expert approves). This module
leaves those fields empty and reports the gap in `coverage.declared`.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from datetime import UTC, datetime
from typing import Any
from src.knowledge_domain.models import (
Authority,
Conventions,
Coverage,
Definition,
DomainContext,
Identity,
Measure,
SourceRef,
Unit,
)
from src.knowledge_extraction.cluster.normalize import AbbrevIndex, normalize
from src.knowledge_ingest.knowledge_store import KnowledgeStore
from src.middlewares.logging import get_logger
logger = get_logger("knowledge_domain")
# A measure with no definition AND no formula is a bare surface - the filter saw
# a term and nothing was learned about it. Those belong in the review queue, not
# in a planner's context, where they add tokens and no information.
_MIN_USEFUL = ("definition", "formula_id")
def _surface_forms(payload: dict[str, Any]) -> list[str]:
"""Every way the documents write this term, deduped, order preserved.
`source_wording` is included precisely when it DISAGREES with the canonical
name - that disagreement is a locked product decision and a planner meeting
either form in a user's question should recognise it.
"""
forms: list[str] = []
for key in ("term", "full_name", "source_wording"):
value = payload.get(key)
if isinstance(value, str) and value.strip() and value.strip() not in forms:
forms.append(value.strip())
return forms
class DomainComposer:
"""Builds one company's domain context out of its approved entries."""
def __init__(self, store: KnowledgeStore | None = None) -> None:
self._store = store or KnowledgeStore()
async def compose(
self,
scope_id: str,
*,
include_unapproved: bool = False,
catalog: Any | None = None,
) -> DomainContext:
"""Compose the context for one company.
⚠️ **`include_unapproved` is a DEVELOPMENT flag and must never be True on
the request path.** Candidates are the model's claims; letting them into
a planner's context means the pipeline's guesses steer the analysis,
which is exactly what the review step exists to prevent. It exists
because `knowledge_reviews` is empty today and a feature nobody can see
working is hard to build against (decided 2026-09-08). Every entry
carries `approved`, so a consumer can always tell them apart, and
turning it on logs loudly.
"""
if include_unapproved:
logger.warning(
"domain_context_including_unapproved",
extra={"scope_id": scope_id, "reason": "development flag"},
)
glossary = await self._store.list_entries(
scope_id=scope_id, kind="glossary", limit=1000
)
formulas = await self._store.list_entries(
scope_id=scope_id, kind="formula", limit=1000
)
rules = await self._store.list_entries(
scope_id=scope_id, kind="rule", limit=1000
)
# The per-document brief. Since the V4-4 split this is kind="document";
# kind="domain" now means something else entirely and must NOT be read
# here. Reading both was a transitional line from before the split, and
# leaving it would have made the first declared domain entry ever
# written get folded into `authority.sources[]` as if it were a file.
briefs = await self._store.list_entries(
scope_id=scope_id, kind="document", limit=200
)
# The DECLARED half - identity, boundary, conventions, entities,
# dimensions. Expert-authored (the model proposes, the expert approves),
# so it must be an entry to be reviewable: `knowledge_reviews` keys on
# `entity_id`. Nothing writes one yet (V4-9/V4-10), so this is normally
# empty - but the seam is here so that when one lands it is applied
# instead of silently ignored.
declared_rows = await self._store.list_entries(
scope_id=scope_id, kind="domain", limit=5
)
reviews = await self._store.latest_reviews(scope_id)
approved_ids = {
entity_id
for entity_id, review in reviews.items()
if review.decision in ("approved", "edited")
}
def _payload(row):
"""The expert's correction wins over the model's original claim."""
review = reviews.get(row.entity_id)
if review is not None and review.decision == "edited" and review.edited_payload:
return review.edited_payload
return row.payload
def _usable(rows):
return [
r for r in rows if include_unapproved or r.entity_id in approved_ids
]
formula_by_id = {r.entity_id: _payload(r) for r in _usable(formulas)}
rule_rows = _usable(rules)
# Rules that name a term govern that measure; rules that name none are
# domain-wide. Splitting here means nothing is listed twice.
governs: dict[str, list[str]] = {}
policies: list[str] = []
for row in rule_rows:
payload = _payload(row)
term_ids = [t for t in (payload.get("term_ids") or []) if t]
if term_ids:
for term_id in term_ids:
governs.setdefault(term_id, []).append(row.entity_id)
else:
policies.append(row.entity_id)
# `term_id` is document-scoped by design - right for review, wrong for a
# domain. Two documents defining PA would otherwise be two measures, the
# same duplication fixed inside one document on 2026-09-08 reappearing
# across documents. Merge on the canonical surface, using the SAME
# normalisation that clusters mentions: one rule at both scales.
index = AbbrevIndex([])
index.learn_inline(
form for row in _usable(glossary) for form in _surface_forms(_payload(row))
)
merged: dict[str, Measure] = {}
for row in _usable(glossary):
payload = _payload(row)
formula_id = payload.get("defining_formula_id")
formula = formula_by_id.get(formula_id) if formula_id else None
if not any(payload.get(k) for k in _MIN_USEFUL) and not formula:
continue
name = payload.get("term") or row.label or row.entity_id
key = index.canonical_key(name) or normalize(name) or row.entity_id
approved = row.entity_id in approved_ids
definition = payload.get("definition")
existing = merged.get(key)
if existing is None:
merged[key] = Measure(
key=key,
term_ids=[row.entity_id],
name=name,
surface_forms=_surface_forms(payload),
definition=definition,
definitions=(
[Definition(text=definition, doc_id=row.doc_id,
term_id=row.entity_id, approved=approved)]
if definition else []
),
source_docs=[row.doc_id],
unit=(formula or {}).get("unit"),
formula_id=formula_id,
formula_latex=(formula or {}).get("formula_latex"),
inputs=[
v.get("symbol")
for v in ((formula or {}).get("variables") or [])
if v.get("symbol")
],
governed_by=list(governs.get(row.entity_id, [])),
catalog_binding=None,
mention_count=row.mention_count or 0,
approved=approved,
)
continue
# Second document, same measure. Union everything; never overwrite.
existing.term_ids.append(row.entity_id)
if row.doc_id not in existing.source_docs:
existing.source_docs.append(row.doc_id)
for form in _surface_forms(payload):
if form not in existing.surface_forms:
existing.surface_forms.append(form)
existing.governed_by.extend(
r for r in governs.get(row.entity_id, []) if r not in existing.governed_by
)
existing.mention_count += row.mention_count or 0
existing.approved = existing.approved or approved
# Prefer the shortest name - "PA" reads better in a card than
# "Physical of Availability (PA)".
if len(name) < len(existing.name):
existing.name = name
existing.formula_id = existing.formula_id or formula_id
existing.formula_latex = existing.formula_latex or (formula or {}).get(
"formula_latex"
)
existing.unit = existing.unit or (formula or {}).get("unit")
if definition:
existing.definitions.append(
Definition(text=definition, doc_id=row.doc_id,
term_id=row.entity_id, approved=approved)
)
# A DISAGREEMENT is the finding, not a problem to resolve. Two
# documents saying different things about one measure is exactly
# what an expert must rule on, so both are kept and the measure
# is marked rather than one silently winning.
distinct = {d.text.strip() for d in existing.definitions}
existing.contested = len(distinct) > 1
if existing.definition is None:
existing.definition = definition
measures = list(merged.values())
# Most-established first: a term the corpus keeps returning to is the one
# a reader should meet first, and it is the sensible truncation order
# when the card has to be capped.
measures.sort(key=lambda m: (-m.mention_count, m.name.casefold()))
if catalog is not None:
self._bind_to_catalog(measures, catalog)
units: list[Unit] = []
seen_units: set[str] = set()
for measure in measures:
if measure.unit and measure.unit not in seen_units:
seen_units.add(measure.unit)
units.append(Unit(symbol=measure.unit))
subdomains: list[str] = []
sources: list[SourceRef] = []
for row in briefs:
payload = _payload(row)
for tag in payload.get("subdomains") or []:
if tag not in subdomains:
subdomains.append(tag)
sources.append(
SourceRef(
doc_id=row.doc_id,
title=payload.get("title"),
n_pages=0,
approved_at=getattr(reviews.get(row.entity_id), "created_at", None),
)
)
# Apply the declared half when an expert has ruled on one.
declared = next(
(_payload(r) for r in declared_rows if include_unapproved
or r.entity_id in approved_ids),
None,
)
identity = Identity(subdomains=subdomains)
conventions = Conventions(units=units)
if declared:
identity = Identity(
domain_name=declared.get("domain_name"),
# Declared subdomains win over the tags rolled up from briefs:
# an expert saying what the domain covers beats an aggregate of
# per-term guesses.
subdomains=list(declared.get("subdomains") or subdomains),
boundary=declared.get("boundary"),
boundary_note=declared.get("boundary_note"),
)
conv = declared.get("conventions") or {}
conventions = Conventions(
time_grain=conv.get("time_grain"),
calendar=conv.get("calendar"),
units=units or [Unit(**u) for u in (conv.get("units") or [])],
)
total = len(glossary) + len(formulas) + len(rules) + len(briefs) + len(
declared_rows
)
context = DomainContext(
scope_id=scope_id,
# Derived, overlaid with the declared half when an expert has
# approved one. `domain_name` and `boundary` stay empty until then.
identity=identity,
measures=measures,
conventions=conventions,
policies=policies,
authority=Authority(
sources=sources,
as_of=datetime.now(UTC),
coverage=Coverage(
n_documents=len(sources),
n_measures=len(measures),
n_policies=len(policies),
n_entries_total=total,
n_entries_approved=len(approved_ids),
approved_ratio=(
(len(approved_ids) / total) if (total and reviews) else None
),
declared=declared is not None,
),
),
)
logger.info(
"domain_context_composed",
extra={
"scope_id": scope_id,
"measures": len(measures),
"policies": len(policies),
"approved": len(approved_ids),
"unapproved_included": include_unapproved,
},
)
return context
@staticmethod
def _bind_to_catalog(measures: list[Measure], catalog: Any) -> None:
"""Resolve each measure to a real `column_id` where one matches.
The field that turns a glossary the planner reads into a semantic layer
it computes against: a measure naming no column is documentation.
Deliberately conservative and **self-disabling** - it matches a measure's
surface forms against column names and binds only on an unambiguous hit.
A wrong binding is worse than none: it would point the planner at real
data under the wrong name, which is the force-mapping failure this whole
model exists to prevent. Mirrors `fk_inference.py`'s posture.
"""
columns: dict[str, str] = {}
for source in getattr(catalog, "sources", []) or []:
for table in getattr(source, "tables", []) or []:
for column in getattr(table, "columns", []) or []:
name = (getattr(column, "name", "") or "").strip().casefold()
column_id = getattr(column, "column_id", None)
if not name or not column_id:
continue
# A name occurring in two tables is ambiguous; drop it rather
# than pick one.
columns[name] = "" if name in columns else column_id
bound = 0
for measure in measures:
for form in measure.surface_forms:
column_id = columns.get(form.strip().casefold())
if column_id:
measure.catalog_binding = column_id
bound += 1
break
logger.info(
"domain_measures_bound",
extra={"bound": bound, "measures": len(measures)},
)
|