[NOTICKET] docs(plans): ratio measures re-test result

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/plans/RATIO_MEASURES_REQUIREMENTS.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # Measures computed from summed hours: requirements
 
 <!-- doc-status -->
-> 🔄 **BUILT, 2026-11-09; chat re-test running.** Approved by Rifqi the same day, all of §9 built: M1–M5, M7 and M8 in code, M6 data written (edited review on formula `f_fa843ac940`). Local tests: 51 new; full suite 1457 passed, 8 skipped (was 1406/8). Client figures stay in the local answer key (`tests/fixtures/claude_test_answer_key.md`). Status legend: ⬜ not started · 🔄 in progress · ✅ done · ⛔ blocked · 🔎 verify · ⏸️ deferred.
+> ✅ **BUILT AND RE-TESTED, 2026-11-09.** Chat re-test, analysis `bb817f9b`: Q1 and Q4 now match the key's summed-hours rows (method named in the scope line); Q2, Q3, Q5 and Q7 unchanged. Q1's answer also called the 10th row of a bottom-10 list "the highest", an order-line wording issue outside this plan. Approved by Rifqi the same day, all of §9 built: M1–M5, M7 and M8 in code, M6 data written (edited review on formula `f_fa843ac940`). Local tests: 51 new; full suite 1457 passed, 8 skipped (was 1406/8). Client figures stay in the local answer key (`tests/fixtures/claude_test_answer_key.md`). Status legend: ⬜ not started · 🔄 in progress · ✅ done · ⛔ blocked · 🔎 verify · ⏸️ deferred.
 
 ## 1. Problem