Spaces:

ICSAC-Institute
/

editorial-system

Running

550 kB

Ctrl+K

2 contributors

Author mail: the receipt no longer calls the audit log tamper-evident; the Zenodo-community comments send a disputed point to help@ instead of inviting a cover note or a reply to the thread

47e37ed 9 days ago

scripts
No author names or real submission events in code, comments, the panel prompt or test fixtures: synthetic names and a synthetic code package; comments describe a submission by month, not by ID 9 days ago
templates
Author mail: the receipt no longer calls the audit log tamper-evident; the Zenodo-community comments send a disputed point to help@ instead of inviting a cover note or a reply to the thread 9 days ago
README.md

4.58 kB
The curation team decides and hears appeals: README note to authors, the legacy acceptance comments and the RQC status line; the intake README lists every field the form now collects 12 days ago
__init__.py

0 Bytes
Public-flip preparation 5 months ago
apply_decision.py

27.7 kB
No author names or real submission events in code, comments, the panel prompt or test fixtures: synthetic names and a synthetic code package; comments describe a submission by month, not by ID 9 days ago
author_approval.py

20.4 kB
Consents at submission: the process acknowledgement, exclusions and the newsletter opt-in 11 days ago
code-check-override.sh

617 Bytes
A paper that says it has code or data must link it: the submit form asks where, a paper with no link anywhere is held for revise and resubmit before the panel, and the published page shows the author's link 12 days ago
code_check_override.py

1.89 kB
A paper that says it has code or data must link it: the submit form asks where, a paper with no link anywhere is held for revise and resubmit before the panel, and the published page shows the author's link 12 days ago
decide.sh

840 Bytes
DOI registration via Crossref (drafts-first, resumable); CiteStamp citation phase; panel and validator fixes; rights-aware author emails 13 days ago
ebook.py

9.92 kB
Security audit 2026-09-28: verified TLS on the drafts mailbox, no decision on the public status endpoint, inert sponsor SVGs, one download email per purchase, capped DOI downloads, credentials off the command line 12 days ago
intake_server.py

77.8 kB
Before the next submission: a revised version links only under the same verified ORCID; a DOI is dead only when doi.org has no such DOI (an outage or another registration agency is "unchecked", never a finding); the authors' surnames are blinded wherever the panel reads them; the per-reference citation lines sit inside the untrusted submission block and the RQC evidence block is declared untrusted; "unanimous" names the reviewers' shared vote; the code digest fetches at most 60 files in 180 s; a forced re-draft keeps the first decision time and the audit log records a draft, never a send. 9 days ago
newsletter.py

4.62 kB
Consents at submission: the process acknowledgement, exclusions and the newsletter opt-in 11 days ago
notify_author.py

28.7 kB
Decision letter: the blind-review disclosure lists what was removed, item by item, and says what stayed visible to the panel; a failed preprocessing step is disclosed without naming the tool. Public Review Quality Control shows only the dimensions the audit scored. 9 days ago
post_publication.py

25 kB
Follow-up at seven days; the Reviewer role as the human in the loop 13 days ago
register-doi.sh

1.05 kB
Live registration never records a skipped landing page as pushed: it stops with the resume instruction and a re-run resumes at the page step; register-doi.sh names the website checkout; the code/data suite tells founding papers from intake papers 11 days ago
rehydrate.py

3.53 kB
Public-flip preparation 5 months ago
rehydrate.sh

264 Bytes
Public-flip preparation 5 months ago
sponsor_logo.py

16.9 kB
Intake hardening: one value per identity field, bounded lists, a byte ceiling on arXiv downloads, text-only substitutions in mail, sponsor writes need a live subscription 12 days ago
submission_worker.py

51.5 kB
Before the next submission: a revised version links only under the same verified ORCID; a DOI is dead only when doi.org has no such DOI (an outage or another registration agency is "unchecked", never a finding); the authors' surnames are blinded wherever the panel reads them; the per-reference citation lines sit inside the untrusted submission block and the RQC evidence block is declared untrusted; "unanimous" names the reviewers' shared vote; the code digest fetches at most 60 files in 180 s; a forced re-draft keeps the first decision time and the audit log records a draft, never a send. 9 days ago
time_fmt.py

2.21 kB
Public-flip preparation 5 months ago