Spaces:
Running on CPU Upgrade
Running on CPU Upgrade
File size: 13,882 Bytes
4aa353b | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 | #!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Score the LLM classifier against human gold-standard codings.
Reads:
- data/gold_standard.jsonl (one JSON object per line, written from the
Classify admin UI; each row is one reviewer's coding of one bill)
- data/classifications.json (from data_updating_scripts/classify_bills.py)
Writes:
- data/eval/<date>_metrics.json — three axes of metrics:
(1) is_ai_related — binary axis: was the bill actually about AI?
Reported as precision/recall/F1 for the "AI" positive class plus
Cohen's κ across reviewer pairs.
(2) regulatory_targets — per-label + macro-F1 + κ. Computed only on
bills where the human majority verdict is is_ai_related = True.
(3) governance_mechanisms — same treatment as (2).
The is_ai_related gate matters: comparing labels on a bill that both
reviewers marked non-AI is meaningless (both are trivially empty).
Bills flagged non-AI drop out of the label-agreement math but stay in
the binary AI-vs-not-AI accuracy.
Usage:
python scripts/evaluate_classifier.py
python scripts/evaluate_classifier.py --gold data/gold_standard.jsonl \
--classifications data/classifications.json --out data/eval
The script does not touch the network. Safe to re-run on every codebook edit.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
import json
import statistics
from collections import defaultdict
from datetime import date
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any
def load_gold(path: Path) -> dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]]:
"""{bill_key: [coding, coding, ...]} — each coding is one reviewer's row."""
out: dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]] = defaultdict(list)
if not path.exists():
return out
with path.open("r", encoding="utf-8") as fp:
for line in fp:
line = line.strip()
if not line:
continue
try:
row = json.loads(line)
except json.JSONDecodeError:
continue
key = row.get("bill_key")
if not key:
continue
# Backward compat: accept both new ("reviewer") and old ("coder")
# field names so older gold_standard.jsonl files still work.
if "reviewer" not in row and "coder" in row:
row["reviewer"] = row["coder"]
out[key].append(row)
return out
def load_predictions(path: Path) -> dict[str, dict[str, Any]]:
if not path.exists():
return {}
with path.open("r", encoding="utf-8") as fp:
data = json.load(fp)
return data if isinstance(data, dict) else {}
def _prf(tp: int, fp: int, fn: int) -> tuple[float, float, float]:
p = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) else 0.0
r = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) else 0.0
f = (2 * p * r / (p + r)) if (p + r) else 0.0
return p, r, f
def _gold_ai_verdict(codings: list[dict[str, Any]]) -> bool | None:
"""Majority vote of reviewers on is_ai_related. Ignores rows where the
field is null (legacy entries). Returns None if no reviewers voted."""
votes = [c.get("is_ai_related") for c in codings if isinstance(c.get("is_ai_related"), bool)]
if not votes:
return None
yes = sum(1 for v in votes if v)
# Majority (ties → True, since a coder who says AI is asserting positive info)
return yes >= (len(votes) + 1) // 2
def _pred_ai_verdict(entry: dict[str, Any]) -> bool | None:
"""Extract is_ai_related from a classifier entry, falling back to the
labels-present heuristic for legacy classifications that predate the field."""
raw = entry.get("is_ai_related")
if isinstance(raw, bool):
return raw
return bool(entry.get("regulatory_targets") or entry.get("governance_mechanisms"))
def is_ai_related_metrics(
gold_by_bill: dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]],
predictions: dict[str, dict[str, Any]],
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Binary axis: was the bill actually AI-related? Positive class = AI."""
tp = fp = fn = tn = 0
counted = 0
for bill_key, codings in gold_by_bill.items():
if bill_key not in predictions:
continue
gold = _gold_ai_verdict(codings)
pred = _pred_ai_verdict(predictions[bill_key])
if gold is None or pred is None:
continue
counted += 1
if gold and pred:
tp += 1
elif pred and not gold:
fp += 1
elif gold and not pred:
fn += 1
else:
tn += 1
p, r, f = _prf(tp, fp, fn)
accuracy = (tp + tn) / counted if counted else 0.0
# Kappa across reviewer pairs on the binary axis.
kappa = _binary_kappa(gold_by_bill, "is_ai_related")
return {
"positive_class": "is_ai_related=true",
"precision": round(p, 3),
"recall": round(r, 3),
"f1": round(f, 3),
"accuracy": round(accuracy, 3),
"tp": tp, "fp": fp, "fn": fn, "tn": tn,
"evaluable_bills": counted,
"inter_rater_kappa": kappa,
}
def _binary_kappa(
gold_by_bill: dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]],
field: str,
) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
"""Cohen's κ on a binary field across the first two reviewers per bill."""
pairs: list[tuple[bool, bool]] = []
for codings in gold_by_bill.values():
typed = [c.get(field) for c in codings if isinstance(c.get(field), bool)]
if len(typed) < 2:
continue
pairs.append((typed[0], typed[1]))
if not pairs:
return None
n = len(pairs)
agree = sum(1 for a, b in pairs if a == b)
po = agree / n
p_a_yes = sum(1 for a, _ in pairs if a) / n
p_b_yes = sum(1 for _, b in pairs if b) / n
pe = p_a_yes * p_b_yes + (1 - p_a_yes) * (1 - p_b_yes)
kappa = (po - pe) / (1 - pe) if (1 - pe) else 0.0
return {
"cohens_kappa": round(kappa, 3),
"observed_agreement": round(po, 3),
"chance_agreement": round(pe, 3),
"matched_bills": n,
}
def per_label_metrics(
gold_by_bill: dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]],
predictions: dict[str, dict[str, Any]],
axis_key: str,
ai_only: bool = True,
) -> dict[str, dict[str, float]]:
"""For each label, tally TP/FP/FN comparing predictions against the
majority-vote of reviewers. When ai_only=True, restricts to bills where
the majority gold verdict is is_ai_related=True — comparing labels on
non-AI bills is meaningless (both sides are trivially empty)."""
per_label_counts: dict[str, dict[str, int]] = defaultdict(lambda: {"tp": 0, "fp": 0, "fn": 0})
for bill_key, codings in gold_by_bill.items():
if bill_key not in predictions:
continue
if ai_only and _gold_ai_verdict(codings) is False:
continue
pred_labels = set(predictions[bill_key].get(axis_key) or [])
vote_counts: dict[str, int] = defaultdict(int)
for c in codings:
for lbl in c.get(axis_key) or []:
vote_counts[lbl] += 1
threshold = (len(codings) + 1) // 2 # majority (ties → yes)
gold_labels = {lbl for lbl, n in vote_counts.items() if n >= threshold}
for lbl in gold_labels | pred_labels:
if lbl in gold_labels and lbl in pred_labels:
per_label_counts[lbl]["tp"] += 1
elif lbl in pred_labels:
per_label_counts[lbl]["fp"] += 1
else:
per_label_counts[lbl]["fn"] += 1
out: dict[str, dict[str, float]] = {}
for lbl, cnt in per_label_counts.items():
p, r, f = _prf(cnt["tp"], cnt["fp"], cnt["fn"])
out[lbl] = {
"precision": round(p, 3),
"recall": round(r, 3),
"f1": round(f, 3),
"tp": cnt["tp"],
"fp": cnt["fp"],
"fn": cnt["fn"],
}
return out
def macro_f1(per_label: dict[str, dict[str, float]]) -> float:
if not per_label:
return 0.0
return round(statistics.fmean(v["f1"] for v in per_label.values()), 3)
def multilabel_kappa(
gold_by_bill: dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]],
axis_key: str,
all_labels: set[str],
ai_only: bool = True,
) -> dict[str, Any] | None:
"""Multi-label κ across the first two reviewers, computed only on bills
where both reviewers agreed the bill is AI-related (labels on non-AI
bills are trivially empty and would inflate agreement)."""
per_label_yes_a: dict[str, int] = defaultdict(int)
per_label_yes_b: dict[str, int] = defaultdict(int)
matched_bills = 0
agree_total = 0
total_cells = 0
for bill_key, codings in gold_by_bill.items():
if len(codings) < 2:
continue
if ai_only:
# Both reviewers must have voted True on is_ai_related for the
# label agreement to be meaningful.
va = codings[0].get("is_ai_related")
vb = codings[1].get("is_ai_related")
if not (va is True and vb is True):
continue
matched_bills += 1
a = set(codings[0].get(axis_key) or [])
b = set(codings[1].get(axis_key) or [])
for lbl in all_labels:
in_a = lbl in a
in_b = lbl in b
per_label_yes_a[lbl] += 1 if in_a else 0
per_label_yes_b[lbl] += 1 if in_b else 0
if in_a == in_b:
agree_total += 1
total_cells += 1
if not matched_bills:
return None
po = agree_total / total_cells if total_cells else 0.0
pes: list[float] = []
for lbl in all_labels:
pa_y = per_label_yes_a[lbl] / matched_bills
pb_y = per_label_yes_b[lbl] / matched_bills
pes.append(pa_y * pb_y + (1 - pa_y) * (1 - pb_y))
pe = statistics.fmean(pes) if pes else 0.0
kappa = (po - pe) / (1 - pe) if (1 - pe) else 0.0
return {
"cohens_kappa": round(kappa, 3),
"observed_agreement": round(po, 3),
"chance_agreement": round(pe, 3),
"matched_bills": matched_bills,
"scope": "bills where both reviewers said is_ai_related=True",
}
def main() -> None:
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("--gold", type=Path, default=Path("data/gold_standard.jsonl"))
parser.add_argument("--classifications", type=Path, default=Path("data/classifications.json"))
parser.add_argument("--out", type=Path, default=Path("data/eval"))
args = parser.parse_args()
gold_by_bill = load_gold(args.gold)
predictions = load_predictions(args.classifications)
print(f"Gold standard: {sum(len(v) for v in gold_by_bill.values())} codings across {len(gold_by_bill)} bills")
print(f"LLM predictions: {len(predictions)} bills")
overlap = [k for k in gold_by_bill if k in predictions]
print(f"Overlap (evaluable): {len(overlap)} bills")
if not overlap:
print("No overlap — skipping metric computation.")
return
# Axis 0: is_ai_related (binary)
ai_metrics = is_ai_related_metrics(gold_by_bill, predictions)
# Axes 1 & 2: label-level (restricted to bills where gold says AI)
targets_per_label = per_label_metrics(gold_by_bill, predictions, "regulatory_targets", ai_only=True)
mechanisms_per_label = per_label_metrics(gold_by_bill, predictions, "governance_mechanisms", ai_only=True)
# Full label vocab (from predictions + gold) — needed for kappa marginals.
all_targets: set[str] = set()
all_mechs: set[str] = set()
for p in predictions.values():
all_targets.update(p.get("regulatory_targets") or [])
all_mechs.update(p.get("governance_mechanisms") or [])
for codings in gold_by_bill.values():
for c in codings:
all_targets.update(c.get("regulatory_targets") or [])
all_mechs.update(c.get("governance_mechanisms") or [])
kappa_targets = multilabel_kappa(gold_by_bill, "regulatory_targets", all_targets, ai_only=True)
kappa_mechs = multilabel_kappa(gold_by_bill, "governance_mechanisms", all_mechs, ai_only=True)
result = {
"date": date.today().isoformat(),
"counts": {
"gold_codings": sum(len(v) for v in gold_by_bill.values()),
"gold_bills": len(gold_by_bill),
"predicted_bills": len(predictions),
"overlap_bills": len(overlap),
},
"is_ai_related": ai_metrics,
"regulatory_targets": {
"per_label": targets_per_label,
"macro_f1": macro_f1(targets_per_label),
"inter_rater_kappa": kappa_targets,
},
"governance_mechanisms": {
"per_label": mechanisms_per_label,
"macro_f1": macro_f1(mechanisms_per_label),
"inter_rater_kappa": kappa_mechs,
},
}
args.out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
out_path = args.out / f"{date.today().isoformat()}_metrics.json"
with out_path.open("w", encoding="utf-8") as fp:
json.dump(result, fp, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)
print(f"\nis_ai_related F1: {ai_metrics['f1']} (accuracy {ai_metrics['accuracy']}, {ai_metrics['evaluable_bills']} bills)")
print(f"Macro-F1 (Regulatory Targets): {result['regulatory_targets']['macro_f1']}")
print(f"Macro-F1 (Governance Mechanisms): {result['governance_mechanisms']['macro_f1']}")
if ai_metrics.get("inter_rater_kappa"):
print(f"Cohen's κ (is_ai_related): {ai_metrics['inter_rater_kappa']['cohens_kappa']} ({ai_metrics['inter_rater_kappa']['matched_bills']} doubly-coded)")
if kappa_targets:
print(f"Cohen's κ (Regulatory Targets): {kappa_targets['cohens_kappa']} ({kappa_targets['matched_bills']} AI-eligible doubly-coded bills)")
if kappa_mechs:
print(f"Cohen's κ (Governance Mechanisms): {kappa_mechs['cohens_kappa']}")
print(f"\nMetrics written to {out_path}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
|