Spaces:
Running
Running
Commit History
-
Iteration 57: maintenance Running
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>0b4790f
-
Iteration 56: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>51f9070 -
Iteration 55: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>7d418f3 -
Iteration 54: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>6f33742 -
Iteration 53: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>122ada5 -
Iteration 52: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>49b218a -
Iteration 51: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>553f3c9 -
Iteration 50: maintenance — 50th iteration milestone
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>a0d7bd5 -
Iteration 49: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>0ac2359
-
Iteration 48: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>da98ebd -
Iteration 47: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>2cd0d63 -
Iteration 46: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>e2056c4 -
Iteration 45: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>c59ef6e -
Iteration 44: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>71f03eb -
Iteration 43: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>9776d0f -
Iteration 42: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>c4e0808 -
Iteration 41: maintenance
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>f327610
-
Iteration 40: maintenance — all systems up
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>e3864fa -
Iteration 39: maintenance — all systems up
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>aa33c0a -
Update REPORT.md: 46/57 verified, Aristotle pipeline docs
Updated stats, added documentation for iterations 28-32: - Auto-repair with exact?/apply? for Mathlib discovery - Wait for Aristotle after max iterations (6h timeout) - Reject sorry finalization while Aristotle pending - Second wind iterations after Aristotle results Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>3d82bd5 -
Iteration 37: maintenance — 46/57 verified, all systems up
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>27ebda2 -
Iteration 36: auto-repair success — x³+y³+z³=3xyz in 12s
Agent wrote sorry, auto-repair filled with grind at iteration 0. Zero agent iterations needed. 46/57 verified (81%), $24.34. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>ac08909 -
Iteration 35: maintenance check — all systems operational
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>e325f2a -
Iteration 34: stable plateau — 45/56 verified, $24.33
Easy proofs avg $0.02, hard problems avg $2.19. All architectural improvements complete. Remaining gap is LLM capability. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>007d1b8
-
Iteration 33: A5 simple — 45/56 verified (80%), $24.33
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>c23c1b2 -
Iteration 32: B2 long-run validates full Aristotle pipeline
73 min, $8.68, 146 iters. Aristotle job completed and was downloaded. Rejection cap of 5 prevents the $8 cost burn from 24 rejections. Full pipeline validated: non-blocking → reject quit → wait → download. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>0900114 -
Reject sorry final_answer while Aristotle pending (max 5 rejections)
When agent tries to finalize with sorry-containing code while Aristotle jobs are still running, reject it and force the agent to keep working. Cap at 5 rejections to avoid infinite cost burn (B2 test burned $8 on 23 rejections). Validated: B2 ran 70+ minutes, received completed Aristotle result, agent was forced to continue working instead of quitting at 14 min. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>d64d4c5 -
Increase Aristotle wait timeout from 2 hours to 6 hours
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>7d872a8 -
Wait for Aristotle after max iterations + second wind iterations
Critical fix: agent was completing with sorry before Aristotle finished (only 1/25 Aristotle jobs ever returned results). Now: when max iterations hit with sorry + pending Aristotle jobs, the worker waits up to 2 hours for Aristotle. If Aristotle returns sorry-containing code, the agent gets 50 more "second wind" iterations to decompose and re-submit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>2717fae -
Add comprehensive development report (REPORT.md)
Summarizes 30 iterations of development: architecture, 43 verified proofs across 10+ domains, 16 code improvements, Putnam assessment, performance tiers, efficiency gains, and known limitations. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>ce83f26 -
Iteration 30: R[X] PID verified, 30-iteration milestone
43/52 verified (83%), $14.44 total. 30 iterations of improvement spanning 16 code changes and 14 test/validation rounds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>7b96d76 -
Add exact?/apply? to auto-repair — Mathlib lemma auto-discovery
Auto-repair now searches all of Mathlib via exact?/apply? when filling sorries. Tested: automatically found Nat.infinite_setOf_prime, EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain, and more in <1s. Any sorry closable by a single Mathlib lemma is now handled automatically, without agent iteration. 42/51 verified (82%), $14.40 total. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>82f3c4f -
Auto-repair sorry-containing code on every check_lean_code
When code compiles with sorry, automatically try repair_lean_proofs. If all sorries filled by grind/simp/omega, use repaired code. Test: agent wrote 2 sorry theorems, auto-repair filled both with grind — agent got verified code back with zero manual effort. 41/50 verified (82%), $14.39 total. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>793062c -
Iteration 27: Q countable — 40/49 verified (82%), $14.38
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>9d71fdf -
Iteration 26: milestone — system complete for current capability tier
40+ verified proofs, 10 domains, 81% success rate, $14.37 total. Architecture is mature and ready for a model upgrade. 26 iterations: from prototype to deployed verified math service. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>2efca39 -
Iteration 25: Lagrange's theorem — 39/48 verified, $14.36
Subgroup.card_subgroup_dvd_card. System stable, no code changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>3af8dec
-
Iteration 24: Z is PID — 38/47 verified (81%), 10 domains, $14.34
Final test: Z is a principal ideal domain (IsPrincipalIdealRing ℤ via infer_instance). 38 verified proofs across 10 mathematical domains over 24 iterations of improvement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>5926d97 -
Iteration 23: 10 domains — order theory + computational primality
Lattice meet associativity (inf_assoc) and 104729 primality (norm_num compile-time check) both verified instantly. 46 jobs: 37 verified (80%), $14.32 total, 10 mathematical domains. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>7d80c53 -
Iteration 22: category theory + probability — 9 domains, 35/44
New domains verified: category theory (iso → mono ∧ epi via infer_instance) and probability (P(∅)=0 via simp). 9 mathematical domains covered. 35/44 verified (80%), $14.30 total. System at stable equilibrium — remaining gap is LLM capability. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>487838c -
Iteration 21: B4 re-test shows 25% faster, 14% cheaper with all fixes
Re-tested Putnam B4 with all 20 iterations of improvements active: - 25% faster (9m54s vs 13m15s) - 14% cheaper ($1.47 vs $1.70) - 38% fewer wasted proof attempts (23 vs 37) - repair_lean_proofs used (new tool) - Still sorry (fundamental capability gap on hard Putnam) 33/42 verified, $14.26 total. System operationally healthy. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>acd6f85 -
Iteration 20: edge case testing — LaTeX input + yes/no questions
Both verified: binomial sum theorem (Nat.sum_range_choose from LaTeX input) and pi irrationality (irrational_pi from "Is pi rational?" yes/no question). 41 jobs: 33 verified, 6 partial, 2 rejected. $12.79 total. System handles LaTeX, plain English, yes/no, false statements, and computational queries across 7 math domains. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>247cef6 -
Iteration 19: final stability check — HF deployment confirmed
2 problems verified on HF Space in 1 iteration each: - Countable union (Set.Countable.union) - Euclid's lemma (Nat.Prime.dvd_mul.mp) 39 local jobs: 31 verified, 6 partial, 2 rejected, $12.77 total. 19 iterations of improvements summarized in log. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>a571d89 -
Add theorem-question alignment check + honest VERIFIED disclaimer
New programmatic check detects: - "for all k" in question but only base_case_k1 proved → WARNING - "number of" in question but no counting in theorem → WARNING Tested: correctly flags A6 (base case) and B5 (no counting), passes Cauchy-Schwarz. Warning is passed to LLM self-review as extra context. VERIFIED emails now include disclaimer: "Please review the theorem statement to confirm it fully captures your question." Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>ed1a13c -
Iteration 17: complete Putnam 2025 coverage, honest assessment
Tested remaining Putnam problems A6 and B5 — both "verify" but only prove helper lemmas (base case / inverse spec), not full claims. Honest assessment: 0/12 Putnam 2025 problems fully proved. System produces sorry-free Lean code but theorems are structural lemmas, not the full competition claims. Self-review can't reliably detect "partial proof" vs "full proof" — fundamental reviewer limitation. System works well for standard math (28 real verifications across 7 domains), not for research-level competition problems. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>8d3e71d
-
Iteration 16: real-world usability — det(MN), compact images, GCD
All 3 verified in <30s: - det(MN) = det(M)·det(N) via Matrix.det_mul - Continuous image of compact is compact via IsCompact.image - GCD(12345, 67890) = 15 by rfl (Lean computes it!) 28/36 verified (78%), $12.26 total. System covers number theory, algebra, linear algebra, analysis, topology, and combinatorics. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>57df423 -
Iteration 15: full-pipeline test — C(2p,p) ≡ 2 (mod p) verified
Agent found Lucas's theorem in Mathlib and applied it correctly. Also proved group of order 4 is abelian (IsPGroup.commutative). Both repair_lean_proofs and Aristotle rate-limiting exercised. 25/33 verified (76%), $12.21 total. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>4a5b19f -
Add repair_lean_proofs tool for instant sorry-filling
New agent tool backed by Axle's repair_proofs API. Tries automation tactics (grind, simp, omega, nlinarith, aesop) to fill sorries in ~1-2 seconds — before the expensive Aristotle submission. Tested: fills simple sorries (n+0=n, commutativity, positivity) instantly. Hard sorries still need Aristotle. Workflow: write sorry → repair_lean_proofs (1s) → if sorry remains, extract_sorry_lemmas → submit to Aristotle. 23/31 verified, $11.60 total. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>f3ef14f -
Update landing page examples to showcase verified capabilities
Replaced examples with 6 problems the system provably solves: sqrt(2) irrational, Cauchy-Schwarz, false statement detection, Fermat's Little Theorem, finite domain→field, AM-GM. Added tech stack description. HF deployment verified working. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>0253f58 -
Iteration 12: reliability stress test — 22/30 verified
3 concurrent algebra problems all verified in <35s: - Injective composition (direct proof) - Finite integral domain → field (Finite.isDomain_to_isField) - (Z/pZ)* cyclic (IsCyclic, infer_instance) 30 total jobs: 22 verified, 6 partial, 2 rejected. $11.51 total. Average $0.13 per verified proof. System stable and reliable. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>177cf65 -
Add extract_sorry_lemmas tool for automated decomposition
New agent tool backed by Axle's sorry2lemma API. When code has sorry, the agent can now automatically extract each sorry'd subgoal into a standalone lemma stub with full context, then submit each to Aristotle independently. Previously: agent manually identified sorry'd parts (error-prone). Now: one API call decomposes sorry-containing code into lemma stubs. Tested on B3v2: correctly extracted sorry into standalone lemma with all hypotheses preserved. Also: independently verified 3 "verified" proofs with Axle MCP — all confirmed genuine (no false positives). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>7879db5