File size: 12,102 Bytes
714a94f
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
from dotenv import load_dotenv
from openai import OpenAI
import json
import os
import requests
from pypdf import PdfReader
import gradio as gr
from pydantic import BaseModel

# Load the environment variables from the .env file. and override the existing ones to avoid any conflicts
load_dotenv(override=True)

# create a pydantic model for the evaluation.
# It has two attributes 
# - is_acceptable: bool : To check if the response is acceptable or not
# - feedback: str : To give the feedback on the response
class Evaluation(BaseModel):
    is_acceptable: bool
    feedback: str



# This functionn sends a push notification to user's mobile through pushover application along with the test
def push(text):
    requests.post(
        "https://api.pushover.net/1/messages.json",
        data={
            "token": os.getenv("PUSHOVER_TOKEN"),
            "user": os.getenv("PUSHOVER_USER"),
            "message": text,
        }
    )


# ----- TOOLS--------------------------------
# This function records the user details and sends a push notification to the user
# If the end user is interested to get in touch then this function is called
def record_user_details(email, name="Name not provided", notes="not provided"):
    push(f"Recording {name} with email {email} and notes {notes}")
    return {"recorded": "ok"}


# This function records the unknown question and sends a push notification to the user
# If the LLM is not able to answer the question then this function will be called
def record_unknown_question(question):
    push(f"Recording {question}")
    return {"recorded": "ok"}


# Define a JSON schema to tell the LLM how to use tool "record_user_details"
record_user_details_json = {
    "name": "record_user_details", # tool name
    "description": "Use this tool to record that a user is interested in being in touch and provided an email address", # when to use tool
    "parameters": {
        "type": "object",
        "properties": {
            "email": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "The email address of this user"
            },
            "name": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "The user's name, if they provided it"
            }
            ,
            "notes": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "Any additional information about the conversation that's worth recording to give context"
            }
        },
        "required": ["email"],
        "additionalProperties": False
    }
}

# This is a JSON schema to tell LLM how to use tool "record_unknown_question"
record_unknown_question_json = {
    "name": "record_unknown_question", # tool name
    "description": "Always use this tool to record any question that couldn't be answered as you didn't know the answer", # when to use tool
    "parameters": {
        "type": "object",
        "properties": {
            "question": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "The question that couldn't be answered"
            },
        },
        "required": ["question"],
        "additionalProperties": False
    }
}

# Defines list of tools to be passed to LLM
tools = [{"type": "function", "function": record_user_details_json}, # This says tool is a function and "record_user_details_json" describing the tool "record_user_details"
        {"type": "function", "function": record_unknown_question_json}]   # This says tool is a function and "record_unknown_question_json" describing the tool "record_unknown_questions"


class Me:

    def __init__(self):
        self.openai = OpenAI()
        self.gemini = OpenAI(api_key=os.getenv("GOOGLE_API_KEY"), base_url="https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/openai/")
        self.name = "Arpan Bandyopadhyay"
        # Prepare the resources for LLM
        reader = PdfReader("me/linkedin_arpan.pdf")
        self.linkedin = ""
        for page in reader.pages:
            text = page.extract_text()
            if text:
                self.linkedin += text
        with open("me/summary.txt", "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
            self.summary = f.read()


    # This function handles the tool calls requested by LLM
    def handle_tool_call(self, tool_calls):
        results = []
        for tool_call in tool_calls:
            tool_name = tool_call.function.name
            arguments = json.loads(tool_call.function.arguments)
            print(f"Tool called: {tool_name}", flush=True)
            # get the tool name from global scope
            tool = globals().get(tool_name)
            # execute the tool if it exists
            result = tool(**arguments) if tool else {}
            results.append({"role": "tool","content": json.dumps(result),"tool_call_id": tool_call.id})
        return results
    

    # This function defines system prompt for LLM (How to act while providing the answer)
    # System prompt is equipped with the resources - summary and linkedin profile
    def system_prompt(self):
        system_prompt = f"You are acting as {self.name}. You are answering questions on {self.name}'s website, \

particularly questions related to {self.name}'s career, background, skills and experience. \

Your responsibility is to represent {self.name} for interactions on the website as faithfully as possible. \

You are given a summary of {self.name}'s background and LinkedIn profile which you can use to answer questions. \

Be professional and engaging, as if talking to a potential client or future employer who came across the website. \

If you don't know the answer to any question, use your record_unknown_question tool to record the question that you couldn't answer, even if it's about something trivial or unrelated to career. \

If the user is engaging in discussion, try to steer them towards getting in touch via email; ask for their email and record it using your record_user_details tool. "

        system_prompt += f"\n\n## Summary:\n{self.summary}\n\n## LinkedIn Profile:\n{self.linkedin}\n\n"
        system_prompt += f"With this context, please chat with the user, always staying in character as {self.name}."
        return system_prompt
    


    # Cobstruct the full message list to send to the LLM -It includes 
    # - System prompt
    # - History of conversation
    # - users message
    def chat(self, message, history):
        # Construct messages list (conversation)
        messages = [{"role": "system", "content": self.system_prompt()}] + history + [{"role": "user", "content": message}]
        done = False
        while not done:
            response = self.openai.chat.completions.create(model="gpt-4o-mini", messages=messages, tools=tools )# tools=tools ->list of tools that LLM can use
            # finish_reason is the reason what API tells us that why the LLM stopped generating the response
            if response.choices[0].finish_reason=="tool_calls": # finish_reason is "tool_calls" means LLM requested for tool calls
                message = response.choices[0].message
                tool_calls = message.tool_calls # Extract list of tool calls what LLM wants to invoke
                results = self.handle_tool_call(tool_calls) # Invoke the tool and get the result
                messages.append(message)
                messages.extend(results)
            else:
                done = True
        # reply from LLM against users message        
        reply= response.choices[0].message.content
        # Evaluate the reply from the LLM using evaluator LLM
        evaluation = self.evaluate(reply, message, history)
        # Check if the reply is acceptable or not
        if evaluation.is_acceptable:
            print("Passed evaluation - returning reply")
        else:
            print("Failed evaluation - retrying")
            print(evaluation.feedback)
            # If the reply is not acceptable then retry it again and get the improved reply from the LLM
            reply = self.rerun(reply, message, history, evaluation.feedback)       
        return reply
    


    # This function retries a previous LLM response that was rejected by a quality evaluator. It sends a new prompt to the LLM with:
    # the previous answer,
    # the reason it was rejected,
    # and asks it to try again.
    def rerun(self,reply, message, history, feedback):
        updated_system_prompt = self.system_prompt() + f"\n\n## Previous answer rejected\nYou just tried to reply, but the quality control rejected your reply\n"
        updated_system_prompt += f"## Your attempted answer:\n{reply}\n\n" #Add the previous (bad) answer to the system prompt
        updated_system_prompt += f"## Reason for rejection:\n{feedback}\n\n"  # Add the reason why it was rejected
        messages = [{"role": "system", "content": updated_system_prompt}] + history + [{"role": "user", "content": message}]
        response = self.gemini.chat.completions.create(model="gemini-2.0-flash", messages=messages)
        return response.choices[0].message.content
    


    # This function defines evaluator system prompt on how to evaluate the reply from the LLM
    def evaluator_system_prompt(self):
        evaluator_system_prompt = f"You are an evaluator that decides whether a response to a question is acceptable. \

    You are provided with a conversation between a User and an Agent. Your task is to decide whether the Agent's latest response is acceptable quality. \

    The Agent is playing the role of {self.name} and is representing {self.name} on their website. \

    The Agent has been instructed to be professional and engaging, as if talking to a potential client or future employer who came across the website. \

    The Agent has been provided with context on {self.name} in the form of their summary and LinkedIn details. Here's the information:"

        evaluator_system_prompt += f"\n\n## Summary:\n{self.summary}\n\n## LinkedIn Profile:\n{self.linkedin}\n\n"
        evaluator_system_prompt += f"With this context, please evaluate the latest response, replying with whether the response is acceptable and your feedback."
        return evaluator_system_prompt
    


    # Define a function to construct a user prompt for an evaluator LLM
    def evaluator_user_prompt(self,reply, message, history):
        # Start by including the full conversation history between the user and the agent
        user_prompt = f"Here's the conversation between the User and the Agent: \n\n{history}\n\n"
        
        # Add the latest message that the user just asked
        user_prompt += f"Here's the latest message from the User: \n\n{message}\n\n"
        
        # Add the latest reply that the agent gave
        user_prompt += f"Here's the latest response from the Agent: \n\n{reply}\n\n"
        
        # Ask the evaluator to review the agent's response
        user_prompt += f"Please evaluate the response, replying with whether it is acceptable and your feedback."
        
        # Return the complete constructed prompt for the evaluator LLM
        return user_prompt
    

    
    # This function evaluates the reply from the LLM using evaluator LLM
    # It includes :
    # - evaluator System prompt
    # - history of conversation
    # - LLM's reply
    # - user's original question
    def evaluate(self,reply, message, history) -> Evaluation:
        messages = [{"role": "system", "content": self.evaluator_system_prompt()}] + [{"role": "user", "content": self.evaluator_user_prompt(reply, message, history)}]
        response = self.gemini.beta.chat.completions.parse(model="gemini-2.0-flash", messages=messages, response_format=Evaluation) # This says it should generate response as per Evaludation class formats
        return response.choices[0].message.parsed



if __name__ == "__main__":
    me = Me()
    gr.ChatInterface(me.chat, type="messages").launch()