Burnmydays Devin commited on
Commit
afdcfd3
·
1 Parent(s): 2685eca

docs: inject benchmark data + deck context from mos2es.com

Browse files

- Add five-kernel benchmark table from mos2es.com/benchmarks:
#1 in cache hit, output:input (110x field avg), tokens/task,
time/task, cost/LOC (96x cheaper) vs AA Coding Agent Index
- Add raw token ledger table (98 sessions, 1.123B tokens)
- Upgrade Benchmark convergence to two-instrument framing
- Add deck + benchmarks links in header line
- Add MO§ES stack context blockquote (Layer 2, patent, founder)

Generated with [Devin](https://cli.devin.ai/docs)

Co-Authored-By: Devin <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +44 -13
README.md CHANGED
@@ -34,7 +34,14 @@ your rank. The ranking metric **Υ = (Cache·Output)/Input²** penalizes raw-inp
34
  padding quadratically — volume can't buy rank — but Υ is only the headline of a
35
  larger metric system whose mathematical thesis is the **cascade decomposition**.
36
 
37
- **GitHub:** [github.com/SunrisesIllNeverSee](https://github.com/SunrisesIllNeverSee) · **Repo:** [SunrisesIllNeverSee/moses-sigrank](https://github.com/SunrisesIllNeverSee/moses-sigrank)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
38
 
39
  ---
40
 
@@ -185,18 +192,42 @@ Cascade (10x DEV) = transmission (O/I) × commitment (Create/O) × compounding
185
  (Read/Create); its log-sum is the exponent. By telescoping, 10^X = Leverage = C/I.
186
 
187
  ## Benchmark convergence
188
- SigRank's finding is corroborated by a second, independent instrument.
189
-
190
- - **Artificial Analysis (AA)** benchmarks measure *models* at a **7:2:1**
191
- (cache : input : output) token mix.
192
- - **SigRank** measures *operators / users* from their own token logs.
193
- - Both instruments converge on the same result: **cache-dominant architecture is
194
- the most efficient AND the cheapest per token.**
195
-
196
- The AA **7:2:1** ratio is the source of the **4.0 efficiency baseline** used in
197
- the Efficiency metric: `(7 + 1) / 2 = 4.0`. Two independent instruments — model
198
- benchmarks on one side, real user token ledgers on the other — landing on the
199
- same architecture is the validation.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
200
 
201
  ## Codex support
202
  Codex never itemizes cache writes, so SigRank estimates the high-signal user input
 
34
  padding quadratically — volume can't buy rank — but Υ is only the headline of a
35
  larger metric system whose mathematical thesis is the **cascade decomposition**.
36
 
37
+ **GitHub:** [github.com/SunrisesIllNeverSee](https://github.com/SunrisesIllNeverSee) · **Repo:** [SunrisesIllNeverSee/moses-sigrank](https://github.com/SunrisesIllNeverSee/moses-sigrank) · **Deck:** [mos2es.com/deck](https://mos2es.com/deck) · **Benchmarks:** [mos2es.com/benchmarks](https://mos2es.com/benchmarks)
38
+
39
+ ---
40
+
41
+ > **SigRank is Layer 2 of the MO§ES™ stack** — the human–AI operator intelligence layer.
42
+ > MO§ES™ is the substrate (compression, recursive execution, drift control). SigRank is the
43
+ > measurement wedge: who is operating at the frontier, and what does their architecture look like?
44
+ > Built by [Deric J. McHenry](https://github.com/SunrisesIllNeverSee) · Ello Cello LLC · Patent pending 19/426,028.
45
 
46
  ---
47
 
 
192
  (Read/Create); its log-sum is the exponent. By telescoping, 10^X = Leverage = C/I.
193
 
194
  ## Benchmark convergence
195
+ SigRank's finding is corroborated by two independent instruments.
196
+
197
+ ### Instrument 1 — Artificial Analysis model benchmarks
198
+ - **AA** benchmarks measure *models* at a **7:2:1** (cache : input : output) token mix.
199
+ - **SigRank** measures *operators* from their own token logs.
200
+ - Both converge: **cache-dominant architecture is the most efficient AND cheapest per token.**
201
+
202
+ The AA **7:2:1** ratio is the source of the **4.0 efficiency baseline**: `(7 + 1) / 2 = 4.0`.
203
+
204
+ ### Instrument 2 — Five measured kernels ([mos2es.com/benchmarks](https://mos2es.com/benchmarks))
205
+ MO§ES operator measured against the AA Coding Agent Index field average — 7-day window,
206
+ raw JSONL extraction across **98 session files**, all subagents. **#1 in all five categories:**
207
+
208
+ | kernel | MO§ES™ | field avg | delta |
209
+ |---|---|---|---|
210
+ | Cache hit rate | **94.66%** | 90.68% | +3.98pp · #1 |
211
+ | Output : Input ratio | **17.9×** | 0.162× | 110× field avg · #1 |
212
+ | Tokens per task | **810K** | 4.67M | 5.8× fewer · #1 |
213
+ | Time per task | **1.84 min** | 11.92 min | 6.5× faster · #1 |
214
+ | Cost per LOC | **$0.0007** | $0.067 | 96× cheaper · #1 |
215
+
216
+ Raw token ledger (98 sessions · 1,123B total tokens):
217
+
218
+ | | Input | Output | Cache Create | Cache Read | Total |
219
+ |---|---|---|---|---|---|
220
+ | MO§ES™ | 123K | 3.90M | 34.83M | 1.084B | 1.123B |
221
+ | Field avg (per model) | 162.9M | 17.2M | — | 1.49B | 1.67B |
222
+
223
+ > Field data: [artificialanalysis.ai/agents/coding-agents](https://artificialanalysis.ai/agents/coding-agents).
224
+ > MO§ES values from operator-reported 7-day window (2026-05-08 → 2026-05-14).
225
+ > Methodology note: AA measures isolated per-task benchmark runs; MO§ES measures sustained
226
+ > product builds. The convergence of #1 leadership across both regimes is the structural result.
227
+
228
+ **This is the real-world grounding behind SigRank's thesis** — the same operator that ranks #1
229
+ on Υ also ranks #1 on every external benchmark kernel. Architecture isn't just a metric; it's
230
+ measurably the most efficient and cheapest operating mode in the field.
231
 
232
  ## Codex support
233
  Codex never itemizes cache writes, so SigRank estimates the high-signal user input