Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
Commit History
21 days ago
-
Drop the baseline and margin columns from the directional table
Six columns instead of eight, at the author's request. The baselines move into the caption rather than out of the chapter: the table's claim is that every configuration loses to a guess, and that has to stay checkable from the same page -- it is also the exact criticism the chapter makes of a paper that reports 79.50% with no baseline beside it. ROC-AUC carries the result unaided, since 0.5000 is chance by construction, so the narrower table still shows the finding: six rows on 0.50 and a control at 0.83. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>391dbf2 -
Put the source's own reported accuracy beside the measurement
The source column named who each row answers to without showing the disagreement, so a reader had to turn to the related-work table to find that the 24h row's source reports 79.50% where this measures 50.3%. Both numbers now sit on one line. The three triple-barrier rows read "method, no figure": Lopez de Prado supplies the labelling protocol and publishes no accuracy to compare, and leaving the cell blank would have implied one was omitted. Jaquart's figure carries a footnote rather than a bare 56%: it is measured at 1-60 minute horizons, which this project never tested, and its own authors state the 60-minute signal does not survive transaction costs. A number that agrees with this result should not be presented as if it contradicted it. Also renders \textsuperscript in the Markdown copy, which was leaking as literal LaTeX. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>1c63f18 -
Label the project's own row instead of leaving a dash
The key column held an em dash on the one row that is this project's measurement, which renders as an empty cell to anyone skimming. "Ours" says what the row is at a glance, which is the row that most needs to be findable. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>72850b8
22 days ago
-
Add the Group D table, and render Markdown as Markdown
The directional result is the one an examiner is most likely to challenge, so it gets what the ablation already had: a source column naming what each row answers to, plus a second table setting the five studies against this project's measurement with the protocol difference stated in the row. The rows are authored once, in LaTeX, because that is the output nobody can fix up by hand afterwards. That left the Markdown copy showing 30{,}969, \% and \textbf{} to a reader. demath() translates on the way out instead, so neither copy is maintained separately and they cannot drift. Document renamed to related_work_four_comparisons.md; nothing referenced the old name. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>4ad230f
23 days ago
-
Use raw strings for the LaTeX ampersands
A plain "\&" in a Python string is a SyntaxWarning now and an error in a future version. The rendered output was already correct; this stops the warning on every run. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>00e6ca5 -
Name the source of every ablation rung, and fix a transcribed digit
The ablation table now carries a source column: each rung cites the study or methodology section it answers to, which makes it checkable and makes visible that exactly one rung in the ladder is this project's own. Also fixes a wrong value. Verifying related_work_three_comparisons.md against ablation_study.json found CNN+Transformer on BTC written as +22.26 where the measurement is +22.25, with CNN+VAE+Transformer likewise +22.60 against +22.65. Both came from hand-transcription into prose, not from the measurements, which match the user's independent re-run on all 36 rungs to within 0.005 points. The document now points at report_tables.md as authoritative where the two disagree. That is the whole argument for generating tables rather than typing them: two digits drifted within hours of the numbers being measured. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>0a8a32c -
Generate report tables from the measured JSONs
Six tables in Markdown and LaTeX, read from the same files the figures read. Nothing is transcribed, so re-running the experiments and this script keeps the tables and the measurements in step. That is the point rather than the convenience. Reformatting results by hand, or by pasting them into a language model and asking for a table, is a step where a digit changes and nobody notices, and a thesis is a bad place for that. A model asked to restyle these should be given this output, so it is only ever changing layout. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>dc2d7e8