Spaces:
Running
Running
File size: 17,158 Bytes
13b1a91 06285fe 13b1a91 9327c55 bed5ea1 9327c55 06285fe 9327c55 06285fe 9327c55 13b1a91 06285fe 13b1a91 9327c55 13b1a91 9327c55 13b1a91 9327c55 06285fe 9327c55 06285fe 9327c55 13b1a91 9327c55 13b1a91 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 | """Recommendation scoring.
The engine only looks at measurable properties: estimated memory fit, bit width,
context, size, Hub popularity, recency and community data. It never looks at a
model's name, uploader or brand. `tests/test_recommend.py` enforces that.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import math
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from typing import Protocol
from .catalogue import ModelRecord
from .memory import MemoryEstimate, estimate
from .parsing import Arch, detect_arch, detect_quant, weights_key
from .model_detail import ModelDetail
PRIORITIES = ["balanced", "quality", "speed", "memory", "long_context"]
# How much each priority cares about each component. Rows sum to 1.
WEIGHTS: dict[str, dict[str, float]] = {
"balanced": {"fit": 0.30, "quant": 0.15, "context": 0.10, "capacity": 0.15, "popularity": 0.20, "recency": 0.05, "community": 0.05},
"quality": {"fit": 0.25, "quant": 0.25, "context": 0.05, "capacity": 0.25, "popularity": 0.12, "recency": 0.03, "community": 0.05},
"speed": {"fit": 0.35, "quant": 0.25, "context": 0.05, "capacity": 0.00, "popularity": 0.15, "recency": 0.05, "community": 0.15},
"memory": {"fit": 0.35, "quant": 0.35, "context": 0.05, "capacity": 0.00, "popularity": 0.15, "recency": 0.05, "community": 0.05},
"long_context": {"fit": 0.25, "quant": 0.15, "context": 0.30, "capacity": 0.05, "popularity": 0.15, "recency": 0.05, "community": 0.05},
}
# Preference over nominal bit width per priority (1 = most preferred).
QUANT_PREF: dict[str, dict[int, float]] = {
"quality": {16: 1.0, 8: 0.95, 6: 0.85, 5: 0.75, 4: 0.6, 3: 0.35, 2: 0.15},
"balanced": {4: 1.0, 5: 0.95, 6: 0.85, 8: 0.75, 3: 0.55, 16: 0.45, 2: 0.25},
"speed": {4: 1.0, 3: 0.85, 5: 0.85, 6: 0.7, 2: 0.6, 8: 0.55, 16: 0.25},
"memory": {2: 1.0, 3: 0.9, 4: 0.8, 5: 0.6, 6: 0.5, 8: 0.3, 16: 0.1},
"long_context": {4: 1.0, 5: 0.9, 6: 0.8, 3: 0.7, 8: 0.65, 2: 0.4, 16: 0.3},
}
def fit_score(ratio: float) -> float:
"""Continuous version of the fit classes, so 'a bit too big' beats 'far too big'."""
if ratio < 0.70:
return 1.0
if ratio < 0.85:
return 1.0 - (ratio - 0.70) / 0.15 * 0.2
if ratio < 1.0:
return 0.8 - (ratio - 0.85) / 0.15 * 0.4
return max(0.0, 0.4 * (1 - (ratio - 1.0)))
@dataclass
class Query:
family: str | None = None
size: str | None = None
quant: str | None = None
context: int = 8192
ram_gb: float | None = None
ram_source: str | None = None # confirmed | estimated | None
priority: str = "balanced"
@dataclass
class CommunitySignal:
feedback_count: int = 0
positive_share: float | None = None
benchmark_count: int = 0
median_generation_tps: float | None = None
median_perplexity: float | None = None # on EVAL_DATASET
perplexity_count: int = 0
EVAL_DATASET = "wikitext2-test-v1"
# Benchmark versions whose perplexity is comparable. mlxbench-1 left BOS off most windows,
# which inflated perplexity for models that have a BOS token (Gemma by 100x).
PPL_BENCHMARK_VERSIONS = ("mlxbench-2",)
EVAL_LABEL = "wikitext-2"
# Perplexity is only comparable between quantizations of the same base model (same tokenizer).
# Across bit widths the priority-based preference already applies, so measurements only move a
# model relative to measured peers of the SAME base model and bit width: each 1% lower perplexity
# than their mean adds this much to the quantization component, each 1% higher subtracts it.
# Unmeasured models are untouched, so measuring is neutral in expectation.
PPL_POINTS_PER_PCT = 0.02
PPL_MAX_SHIFT = 0.25
def perplexity_refs(community: dict, base_of: dict, bucket_of: dict | None = None) -> dict:
"""(base_model, quant bucket) -> [(model id, median perplexity)].
Only quantizations of the same weights are comparable, so the base model is refined
by ``weights_key`` of the repo name: a coder or abliterated finetune that declares the
same base_model lands in its own group.
"""
bucket_of = bucket_of or {}
groups: dict[tuple, list] = {}
for mid, sig in community.items():
base = base_of.get(mid)
if base and sig.median_perplexity:
groups.setdefault((ppl_group(base, mid), bucket_of.get(mid)), []).append((mid, sig.median_perplexity))
return groups
def ppl_group(base_model: str, model_id: str) -> str:
return f"{base_model}::{weights_key(model_id)}"
@dataclass
class Scored:
model: ModelRecord
score: float
components: dict[str, float]
reasons: list[str]
memory: MemoryEstimate
detail_loaded: bool
community: CommunitySignal = field(default_factory=CommunitySignal)
quant: dict = field(default_factory=dict) # effective quantization (config beats name/tags)
def to_dict(self) -> dict:
return {
"model": self.model.public(),
"score": round(self.score, 1),
"components": {k: round(v, 3) for k, v in self.components.items()},
"reasons": self.reasons,
"memory": self.memory.to_dict(),
"detail_loaded": self.detail_loaded,
"quant": self.quant or self.model.quant,
"community": self.community.__dict__,
}
class RecommendationEngine(Protocol):
version: str
def score(self, models: list[ModelRecord], query: Query,
details: dict[str, ModelDetail], community: dict[str, CommunitySignal]) -> list[Scored]: ...
def _months_since(iso: str | None, now: datetime) -> float | None:
if not iso:
return None
try:
dt = datetime.fromisoformat(iso.replace("Z", "+00:00"))
except ValueError:
return None
return max(0.0, (now - dt).days / 30.4)
def _fmt_ctx(n: int) -> str:
return f"{n // 1024}k" if n >= 1024 else str(n)
def _fmt_downloads(n: int) -> str:
if n >= 1_000_000:
return f"{n / 1e6:.1f}M"
if n >= 1000:
return f"{n / 1e3:.0f}k"
return str(n)
class HeuristicEngine:
version = "heuristic-v1"
def __init__(self, now: datetime | None = None):
self._now = now
def memory_for(self, m: ModelRecord, query: Query, detail: ModelDetail | None) -> tuple[MemoryEstimate, dict]:
quant = m.quant
arch = Arch(None, None, 0, None, None, None, None, False)
file_bytes = None
if detail:
arch = detect_arch(detail.config)
file_bytes = detail.weight_bytes
if detail.config:
q = detect_quant(m.id, m.tags, detail.config)
if q.bits is not None:
quant = q.to_dict()
mem = estimate(params=m.params, bits=quant["bits"], mode=quant["mode"], file_bytes=file_bytes,
arch=arch, context=query.context, ram_gb=query.ram_gb)
return mem, quant
def norms(self, models, query, details=None) -> dict:
"""Set-wide reference values, computed once over ALL matches so a model's score
doesn't depend on which page of results it is rescored in."""
details = details or {}
fitting = []
for m in models:
if not m.params or m.partial:
continue
if query.ram_gb is None:
fitting.append(m.params)
continue
mem, _ = self.memory_for(m, query, details.get(m.id))
if mem.fit in ("Comfortable", "Likely"):
fitting.append(m.params)
return {
"max_downloads": max((m.downloads for m in models), default=0),
"max_likes": max((m.likes for m in models), default=0),
"max_fitting_params": max(fitting, default=0),
"ppl_refs": {},
}
def score(self, models, query, details=None, community=None, norms=None) -> list[Scored]:
details = details or {}
community = community or {}
now = self._now or datetime.now(timezone.utc)
priority = query.priority if query.priority in WEIGHTS else "balanced"
weights = WEIGHTS[priority]
norms = norms or self.norms(models, query, details)
max_dl, max_likes = norms["max_downloads"], norms["max_likes"]
max_fit_params = norms["max_fitting_params"]
ppl_refs = norms.get("ppl_refs") or {}
out = []
for m in models:
detail = details.get(m.id)
mem, quant = self.memory_for(m, query, detail)
comm = community.get(m.id) or CommunitySignal()
comp: dict[str, float] = {}
reasons: list[str] = []
# Hardware fit
if mem.total_gb is None:
comp["fit"] = 0.5
reasons.append("Memory need unknown: some model information isn't available.")
elif query.ram_gb is None:
comp["fit"] = 0.6
reasons.append(f"Needs roughly {mem.total_gb:.1f} GB at {_fmt_ctx(query.context)} context (estimate). "
"Set your memory to check fit.")
else:
comp["fit"] = fit_score(mem.ratio)
src = "confirmed" if query.ram_source == "confirmed" else "estimated"
reasons.append(f"{mem.fit} fit: ~{mem.total_gb:.1f} GB needed vs ~{mem.usable_gb:.0f} GB "
f"GPU-usable on a {query.ram_gb:g} GB Mac ({src}).")
# Quantization vs priority
bits = quant["bits"]
if bits is None:
comp["quant"] = 0.4
reasons.append("Quantization unknown.")
else:
key = 16 if bits >= 16 else int(round(bits))
comp["quant"] = QUANT_PREF[priority].get(key, 0.4)
if query.ram_gb and mem.fit == "Unlikely":
comp["quant"] *= 0.25 # bit-width preference is moot if it won't load
label = quant.get("label") or f"{key}-bit"
if quant is not m.quant and m.quant.get("bits") and quant.get("bits") != m.quant.get("bits"):
reasons.append(f"Its config.json says {label}, although the name or tags say {m.quant['label']}.")
note = {
"quality": "more bits keep more of the original model's quality",
"memory": "fewer bits mean a smaller download and less memory",
"speed": "fewer bits usually decode faster on unified memory, but speed depends on the model and Mac",
"long_context": "leaves more memory for the KV cache",
"balanced": "4 to 6 bits is the usual quality/memory middle ground",
}[priority]
reasons.append(f"{label}: {note}.")
# Measured quality: compare with measured quantizations of the same base model and width
ppl = comm.median_perplexity
bucket = m.quant_bucket
if ppl and m.base_model and bits is not None:
group = ppl_group(m.base_model, m.id)
peers = [p for mid, p in ppl_refs.get((group, bucket), []) if mid != m.id]
if peers:
peer_mean = sum(peers) / len(peers)
delta_pct = (peer_mean - ppl) / peer_mean * 100 # positive = better than peers
shift = max(-PPL_MAX_SHIFT, min(PPL_MAX_SHIFT, PPL_POINTS_PER_PCT * delta_pct))
comp["quant"] = max(0.0, comp["quant"] + shift)
comp["measured_quality"] = round(shift, 4)
n = f"{len(peers)} other measured {bucket} quantization{'s' if len(peers) > 1 else ''}"
direction = "lower" if delta_pct >= 0 else "higher"
reasons.insert(1, f"Perplexity {ppl:.2f} on {EVAL_LABEL}: {abs(delta_pct):.1f}% {direction} than "
f"the {n} of this base model (lower is better).")
else:
others = [(mid, p) for (grp, _), items in ppl_refs.items() if grp == group
for mid, p in items if mid != m.id]
extra = f" Other widths of this base model measure {', '.join(f'{p:.2f}' for _, p in others[:3])}." if others else ""
reasons.append(f"Perplexity {ppl:.2f} on {EVAL_LABEL}; no other {bucket} quantization of this base "
f"model has been measured to compare against.{extra}")
# Context
if mem.exceeds_model_context:
comp["context"] = 0.0
reasons.append(f"The model's config lists a shorter maximum context than {_fmt_ctx(query.context)}.")
elif mem.total_gb is not None and mem.kv_gb is not None:
if query.ram_gb:
headroom = 1 - mem.total_gb / max(mem.usable_gb or 1, 0.1)
comp["context"] = max(0.0, min(1.0, 0.5 + headroom))
else:
share = mem.kv_gb / max(mem.total_gb, 0.01)
comp["context"] = max(0.0, 1 - share)
bound = " (rough, architecture unknown)" if mem.kv_rough else ""
reasons.append(f"KV cache at {_fmt_ctx(query.context)}: ~{mem.kv_gb:.1f} GB{bound}.")
else:
comp["context"] = 0.5
# Capacity: among models that fit, more parameters usually means a more capable model
if query.ram_gb is None:
comp["capacity"] = 0.5 # without a memory budget, "bigger" would just mean "won't fit"
elif m.params and max_fit_params and mem.fit not in ("Borderline", "Unlikely"):
comp["capacity"] = min(1.0, math.log10(1 + m.params / 1e8) / math.log10(1 + max_fit_params / 1e8))
if weights["capacity"] and m.params < 0.5 * max_fit_params:
reasons.append(f"{m.params / 1e9:.1f}B parameters; models up to {max_fit_params / 1e9:.0f}B "
f"in these results fit your Mac, and larger models are usually more capable.")
elif m.params and max_fit_params:
comp["capacity"] = 0.0
else:
comp["capacity"] = 0.5
# Popularity: downloads and likes, log-scaled against the best in this result set
dl = math.log10(m.downloads + 1) / math.log10(max_dl + 1) if max_dl > 0 else 0.0
lk = math.log10(m.likes + 1) / math.log10(max_likes + 1) if max_likes > 0 else 0.0
comp["popularity"] = 0.7 * dl + 0.3 * lk
if m.downloads:
reasons.append(f"{_fmt_downloads(m.downloads)} Hugging Face downloads.")
# Recency: half-life of a year
months = _months_since(m.modified, now)
comp["recency"] = 0.5 ** (months / 12) if months is not None else 0.3
# Community data (zero until people contribute)
if comm.benchmark_count or comm.feedback_count:
c = min(1.0, math.log10(1 + comm.benchmark_count + comm.feedback_count) / 2)
if comm.positive_share is not None:
c = 0.5 * c + 0.5 * comm.positive_share
comp["community"] = c
bits_ = []
if comm.benchmark_count:
tps = f", median {comm.median_generation_tps:.0f} tok/s" if comm.median_generation_tps else ""
bits_.append(f"{comm.benchmark_count} MLX benchmark(s){tps}")
if comm.feedback_count:
bits_.append(f"{comm.feedback_count} community report(s)")
reasons.append("Community: " + "; ".join(bits_) + ".")
else:
comp["community"] = 0.0
score = min(100.0, 100 * sum(weights[k] * comp[k] for k in weights))
if m.partial:
score *= 0.6
reasons.insert(0, "This repo holds far fewer weights than its name suggests. It may be an add-on "
"(draft head, adapter or partial upload) rather than a complete model.")
if query.ram_gb and mem.fit == "Unlikely":
score *= 0.5 # never recommend something that likely won't load over something that will
out.append(Scored(m, score, comp, reasons, mem, detail is not None and detail.config is not None, comm, quant))
return out
def sort_results(scored: list[Scored], sort: str) -> list[Scored]:
if sort == "popular":
key = lambda s: (-s.model.downloads, s.model.id)
elif sort == "recent":
key = lambda s: (-(_ts(s.model.modified)), s.model.id)
elif sort == "community":
key = lambda s: (-(s.community.benchmark_count + s.community.feedback_count), -s.score, s.model.id)
elif sort == "all":
key = lambda s: s.model.id.lower()
else:
key = lambda s: (-s.score, -s.model.downloads, s.model.id)
return sorted(scored, key=key)
def _ts(iso: str | None) -> float:
if not iso:
return 0.0
try:
return datetime.fromisoformat(iso.replace("Z", "+00:00")).timestamp()
except ValueError:
return 0.0
|