Spaces:
Running
Running
Commit History
-
fix(constructs): correct the review pass after a validity review
A research-validity review of the previous commit found four real problems. All four are fixed here. Two of the reviewer's wording corrections moved an item AWAY from the publication its construct cites, and I had applied them under a `verified` badge. Checked against the sources: the published MFQ30 reads "treated differently than others" (not "from"), and Edmondson (1999) reads "It is safe to take a risk on this team" (not "in") - the proposed "in this team" comes from a third-party questionnaire, whose URL I had also promoted over the working Edmondson PDF. Both items keep their published wording, both constructs are held back as unverified with the disagreement recorded, and the source_url override is dropped. The reviewer's item-ORDER findings for rses and cbi_work_related_burnout were silently dropped: my classifier only read notes on rows that failed one of the four checks, and these sat on rows marked OK. Order feeds item_hash and decides what sim_item_N means, so both are no…461b859
-
Sync platform from lab mainline: dev instance ready to deploy
Full feature set: accounts (email/password + feature-flagged Google via Supabase PKCE), anonymous tiers (3 runs/day, delete-after-analysis, 24h purge), saved-run cap, construct upload from CSV/XLSX, structured warnings + language detection, model registry (MiniLM/E5), per-run reproduction scripts, corpus-embedding cache, storage interface (local/ R2), sample-data test kit, MANUAL_TESTING.md. Rights guard: only the 5 original seed constructs ship in this public repo; the imported lab collection stays out pending the redistribution decision. HF remote URL detokenized. 64 tests passing.4b09d2d