File size: 14,251 Bytes
e6c104f | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 | """The LangGraph supervisor: Gatekeeper -> Planner -> Tools -> Auditor -> Synthesizer.
Ported from `agent_tools.py` with two bug fixes and one prompt change.
Bug 1 β the original router cleared failed work with `state['intermediate_steps'] = []`
inside a conditional-edge function. Conditional edges only choose a route; their
mutations are discarded, so rejected tool output stayed in state and reached the
Synthesizer. Clearing now happens in the Planner, which can actually write state.
Bug 2 β nothing capped Auditor-driven replanning. If the model could not satisfy
the Auditor, planner -> tools -> auditor cycled until LangGraph raised
GraphRecursionError. `replan_count` is now checked against `max_replans`, and on
exhaustion the graph synthesises from what it has instead of looping.
Prompt change β the Gatekeeper prompt that worked on Gemini makes Qwen2.5-7B far
too eager to ask for clarification; it rejected "What was Alphabet revenue in
FY2024?" as ambiguous. It now gets worked examples and a default-to-specific rule.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import asyncio
import json
import re
from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, TypedDict
from langgraph.graph import END, StateGraph
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from ..config import get_settings
from .llm import chat_model, structured_model
from .tools import ALL_TOOLS, TOOL_MAP
class AgentState(TypedDict, total=False):
original_request: str
clarification_question: Optional[str]
plan: List[Dict[str, Any]]
intermediate_steps: List[Dict[str, Any]]
verification_history: List[Dict[str, Any]]
replan_count: int
final_response: str
# --- Structured output schemas ----------------------------------------------
class GatekeeperDecision(BaseModel):
is_specific: bool = Field(description="True if the request is actionable as written.")
clarification_question: Optional[str] = Field(
default=None, description="Question to ask the user. Null when is_specific is true."
)
class PlanStep(BaseModel):
tool_name: str = Field(description="Exact tool name, or FINISH for the final step.")
tool_input: str = Field(description="Complete input string for the tool.")
class Plan(BaseModel):
steps: List[PlanStep] = Field(description="Ordered tool calls. The last must be FINISH.")
class VerificationResult(BaseModel):
confidence_score: int = Field(ge=1, le=5, description="1-5 confidence in the tool output.")
is_relevant: bool
reasoning: str
# Demo corpus is the FY2024 Alphabet 10-K only. Other years are refused
# before any LLM call so they do not burn GPU or invent numbers from the
# leftover 2022β2023 SQL rows.
DEMO_SCOPE_YEAR = 2024
DEMO_SCOPE_MESSAGE = (
"This is a demo project with limited data. Only Alphabet's FY2024 10-K "
"is in scope, so I cannot answer questions about other years. Ask about "
"2024, for example: \"What was total revenue in FY2024?\""
)
_YEAR_RE = re.compile(r"\b(?:fy\s*)?(20\d{2})\b", re.IGNORECASE)
_MULTI_YEAR_RE = re.compile(
r"\b(?:last|past|previous|prior)\s+"
r"(?:\d+|two|three|four|five)\s+years?\b"
r"|\bover the years\b",
re.IGNORECASE,
)
def demo_scope_refusal(request: str) -> Optional[str]:
"""Return the demo refusal if the request names a year other than 2024."""
years = {int(match.group(1)) for match in _YEAR_RE.finditer(request)}
if any(year != DEMO_SCOPE_YEAR for year in years) or _MULTI_YEAR_RE.search(request):
return DEMO_SCOPE_MESSAGE
return None
_SPECIFIC_RE = re.compile(
r"revenue|margin|risk|10-?k|income|cloud|search|capex|eps|profit|"
r"filing|segment|advertising|youtube|net income",
re.IGNORECASE,
)
def looks_actionable(request: str) -> bool:
"""True when the request already names a metric or topic, so skip the LLM Gatekeeper."""
return bool(_SPECIFIC_RE.search(request))
# --- Prompts ----------------------------------------------------------------
GATEKEEPER_PROMPT = """You decide whether a financial research request is actionable.
Default to SPECIFIC. Only ask for clarification when the request names no metric,
no topic and no time frame at all.
SPECIFIC examples:
- "What was total revenue in FY2024?" (names a metric and a period)
- "Analyze the revenue trend and the competitive risks in the 10-K" (multi-part is still specific)
- "Compare cloud growth to search" (names segments)
AMBIGUOUS examples:
- "How is the company?" (no metric, no topic, no period)
- "Tell me about it."
Request: "{request}"
"""
AUDITOR_PROMPT = """Audit whether this tool output answers the user's request.
Score 1-5 on whether the output, on its own, is sufficient to answer the request:
1-2 = misses the request or covers only part of a multi-part question
3 = adequate
4-5 = fully covers the request
User request: {request}
Tool called: {tool_name}
Tool output: {tool_output}
"""
SYNTHESIZER_PROMPT = """You are an expert financial analyst. Answer the user's request
using only the context below. Where you infer a causal link, label it explicitly as a
hypothesis rather than stating it as fact. If the context does not support part of the
request, say so.
User request:
{request}
Context:
---
{context}
---
Answer:"""
def _planner_prompt(request: str, feedback: str) -> str:
descriptions = "\n".join(
f"- {t.name}: {(t.description or '').strip()}" for t in ALL_TOOLS
)
return f"""Create a short plan to answer the request using the tools below.
Use tool names exactly as written. The final step must always be FINISH with an empty input.
Use the fewest tools that can answer. One tool is enough for a single metric or a
single qualitative topic. Never call every tool. Never add a tool "just in case".
At most two tools before FINISH unless the user asked two distinct questions.
Tools:
{descriptions}
- FINISH: signals the plan is complete.
{feedback}
User request: {request}
"""
# --- Nodes ------------------------------------------------------------------
async def gatekeeper_node(state: AgentState) -> Dict[str, Any]:
request = state["original_request"]
scoped = demo_scope_refusal(request)
if scoped:
return {"clarification_question": None, "final_response": scoped}
if looks_actionable(request):
return {"clarification_question": None}
try:
decision = await structured_model(GatekeeperDecision).ainvoke(
GATEKEEPER_PROMPT.format(request=request)
)
except Exception:
# A Gatekeeper failure should not block the request; let the Planner try.
return {"clarification_question": None}
if decision.is_specific:
return {"clarification_question": None}
return {
"clarification_question": decision.clarification_question
or "Could you be more specific about which metric or period you mean?"
}
async def planner_node(state: AgentState) -> Dict[str, Any]:
settings = get_settings()
request = state["original_request"]
history = state.get("verification_history") or []
steps = state.get("intermediate_steps") or []
is_replan = bool(history) and history[-1]["confidence_score"] < settings.audit_pass_score
feedback = ""
if is_replan:
audit = history[-1]
failed_tool = steps[-1]["tool_name"] if steps else "unknown"
feedback = (
"Previous attempt feedback:\n"
f"The tool '{failed_tool}' was called but the auditor scored it "
f"{audit['confidence_score']}/5, reasoning: '{audit['reasoning']}'\n"
"Produce a DIFFERENT plan that covers what was missed. Do not repeat the "
"same first step.\n"
)
plan = await structured_model(Plan).ainvoke(_planner_prompt(request, feedback))
steps_out = [step.model_dump() for step in plan.steps]
# Bound the plan so the superstep budget stays a known quantity.
working = [s for s in steps_out if s["tool_name"] != "FINISH"][: settings.max_plan_steps]
steps_out = working + [{"tool_name": "FINISH", "tool_input": ""}]
updates: Dict[str, Any] = {"plan": steps_out}
if is_replan:
# Discard rejected work so the Synthesizer never grounds on it, and reset
# the audit trail so the router judges the new attempt on its own merits.
updates["intermediate_steps"] = []
updates["verification_history"] = []
updates["replan_count"] = state.get("replan_count", 0) + 1
return updates
async def tool_executor_node(state: AgentState) -> Dict[str, Any]:
plan = state.get("plan") or []
if not plan:
return {}
step, remaining = plan[0], plan[1:]
if step["tool_name"] == "FINISH":
return {"plan": remaining}
tool = TOOL_MAP.get(step["tool_name"])
if tool is None:
# Hallucinated tool name. Record it as a failed step so the Auditor sees
# the problem and the Planner gets a chance to correct itself.
output: Any = f"Unknown tool '{step['tool_name']}'. Valid tools: {sorted(TOOL_MAP)}"
else:
try:
output = await tool.ainvoke({"query": step["tool_input"]})
except Exception as exc:
output = f"Tool raised {type(exc).__name__}: {exc}"
completed = {
"tool_name": step["tool_name"],
"tool_input": step["tool_input"],
"tool_output": output,
}
return {
"intermediate_steps": (state.get("intermediate_steps") or []) + [completed],
"plan": remaining,
}
async def auditor_node(state: AgentState) -> Dict[str, Any]:
steps = state.get("intermediate_steps") or []
if not steps:
return {}
last = steps[-1]
try:
result = await structured_model(VerificationResult).ainvoke(
AUDITOR_PROMPT.format(
request=state["original_request"],
tool_name=last["tool_name"],
# Truncated: retrieval output can be tens of KB and the model has
# a 4096-token context window.
tool_output=json.dumps(last["tool_output"], default=str)[:2500],
)
)
audit = result.model_dump()
except Exception as exc:
# Treat an unreadable audit as a pass. Failing closed here would replan
# on infrastructure errors, which is the wrong response.
audit = {
"confidence_score": get_settings().audit_pass_score,
"is_relevant": True,
"reasoning": f"Audit unavailable ({type(exc).__name__}); proceeding.",
}
return {"verification_history": (state.get("verification_history") or []) + [audit]}
async def synthesizer_node(state: AgentState) -> Dict[str, Any]:
steps = state.get("intermediate_steps") or []
if not steps:
return {
"final_response": (
"I could not gather enough grounded information to answer that. "
"Try naming a specific metric and period."
)
}
context = "\n\n".join(
f"## Tool: {s['tool_name']}\nOutput: {json.dumps(s['tool_output'], default=str)[:3000]}"
for s in steps
)
response = await chat_model(temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1024).ainvoke(
SYNTHESIZER_PROMPT.format(request=state["original_request"], context=context)
)
return {"final_response": response.content}
# --- Routing ----------------------------------------------------------------
def route_after_audit(state: AgentState) -> str:
settings = get_settings()
history = state.get("verification_history") or []
plan = state.get("plan") or []
remaining = [s for s in plan if s["tool_name"] != "FINISH"]
audit_failed = bool(history) and history[-1]["confidence_score"] < settings.audit_pass_score
if audit_failed:
if state.get("replan_count", 0) < settings.max_replans:
return "planner"
# Replan budget spent. Keep going only if untried steps remain β they may
# yet succeed. Otherwise synthesise from imperfect evidence, which beats
# burning supersteps re-auditing failures until the limit trips.
return "execute_tool" if remaining else "synthesize"
return "execute_tool" if remaining else "synthesize"
def build_graph():
builder = StateGraph(AgentState)
builder.add_node("gatekeeper", gatekeeper_node)
builder.add_node("planner", planner_node)
builder.add_node("execute_tool", tool_executor_node)
builder.add_node("verify", auditor_node)
builder.add_node("synthesize", synthesizer_node)
builder.set_entry_point("gatekeeper")
builder.add_conditional_edges(
"gatekeeper",
lambda s: END if (s.get("clarification_question") or s.get("final_response")) else "planner",
{END: END, "planner": "planner"},
)
builder.add_edge("planner", "execute_tool")
builder.add_edge("execute_tool", "verify")
builder.add_conditional_edges(
"verify",
route_after_audit,
{"planner": "planner", "execute_tool": "execute_tool", "synthesize": "synthesize"},
)
builder.add_edge("synthesize", END)
return builder.compile()
_graph = None
def get_graph():
global _graph
if _graph is None:
_graph = build_graph()
return _graph
def run_config() -> Dict[str, Any]:
return {"recursion_limit": get_settings().recursion_limit}
async def run_agent(query: str) -> AgentState:
"""Run to completion under a hard wall-clock ceiling.
The recursion limit bounds graph steps but not time β a single slow tool can
still hang the request, so both ceilings are needed.
"""
settings = get_settings()
initial: AgentState = {"original_request": query, "replan_count": 0}
return await asyncio.wait_for(
get_graph().ainvoke(initial, run_config()),
timeout=settings.agent_timeout_s,
)
|