Spaces:
Running
Running
Upload README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,10 +1,32 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
-
title:
|
| 3 |
-
emoji:
|
| 4 |
-
colorFrom:
|
| 5 |
-
colorTo:
|
| 6 |
sdk: static
|
| 7 |
pinned: false
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
+
title: Murray Love Code
|
| 3 |
+
emoji: 🛡️
|
| 4 |
+
colorFrom: blue
|
| 5 |
+
colorTo: indigo
|
| 6 |
sdk: static
|
| 7 |
pinned: false
|
| 8 |
+
short_description: Open enterprise data agent governance resources
|
| 9 |
---
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
# Enterprise Data Agent Governance
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
**Open resources for deciding when an AI agent may answer from enterprise data, when it must request clarification or defer, and what evidence an organization should retain.**
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
This organization hosts the Hugging Face distribution of the Enterprise Data Agent Governance project. The current dataset contains 18 synthetic evaluation cases across three decision bands—`answer`, `needs_definition`, and `refuse`—alongside machine-readable controls, schemas, citation metadata, licensing, and a version-pinned Mnemiq evidence record.
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
## Project resources
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
- [Hugging Face dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/murraylovecode/enterprise-data-agent-governance) — evaluation cases and machine-readable governance resources
|
| 20 |
+
- [Canonical GitHub repository](https://github.com/murraylovecode/enterprise-data-agent-governance) — code, schemas, project files, releases, and version history
|
| 21 |
+
- [Public reference site](https://murraylovecode.github.io/enterprise-data-agent-governance/) — framework overview and practitioner guidance
|
| 22 |
+
- [GitBook knowledge base](https://murray-love-code.gitbook.io/murray-love-code-docs/) — navigable implementation guidance
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
## Scope
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
The resources support governed enterprise-data-agent evaluation, refusal testing, control workshops, and reproducible implementation planning. The cases are synthetic and are not a substitute for deployment-specific testing, access controls, semantic ownership, data-quality checks, or human oversight.
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
## Important disclosures
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
This project is independently maintained by Murray Newlands as a personal practitioner resource. It is not official product documentation for Mnemiq or Agentic Fabriq and does not constitute independent certification or validation of any vendor. Mnemiq is included as a publicly inspectable worked case study. Agentic Fabriq develops and maintains Mnemiq, and Murray Newlands advises Agentic Fabriq.
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
The framework is not legal, compliance, or security advice. Organizations must adapt its controls to their own risk, data, jurisdiction, and operating environment.
|