MurrayNewlands commited on
Commit
adf44ce
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f02cfd6

Upload README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +27 -5
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,10 +1,32 @@
1
  ---
2
- title: README
3
- emoji: 😻
4
- colorFrom: pink
5
- colorTo: purple
6
  sdk: static
7
  pinned: false
 
8
  ---
9
 
10
- Edit this `README.md` markdown file to author your organization card.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
  ---
2
+ title: Murray Love Code
3
+ emoji: 🛡️
4
+ colorFrom: blue
5
+ colorTo: indigo
6
  sdk: static
7
  pinned: false
8
+ short_description: Open enterprise data agent governance resources
9
  ---
10
 
11
+ # Enterprise Data Agent Governance
12
+
13
+ **Open resources for deciding when an AI agent may answer from enterprise data, when it must request clarification or defer, and what evidence an organization should retain.**
14
+
15
+ This organization hosts the Hugging Face distribution of the Enterprise Data Agent Governance project. The current dataset contains 18 synthetic evaluation cases across three decision bands—`answer`, `needs_definition`, and `refuse`—alongside machine-readable controls, schemas, citation metadata, licensing, and a version-pinned Mnemiq evidence record.
16
+
17
+ ## Project resources
18
+
19
+ - [Hugging Face dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/murraylovecode/enterprise-data-agent-governance) — evaluation cases and machine-readable governance resources
20
+ - [Canonical GitHub repository](https://github.com/murraylovecode/enterprise-data-agent-governance) — code, schemas, project files, releases, and version history
21
+ - [Public reference site](https://murraylovecode.github.io/enterprise-data-agent-governance/) — framework overview and practitioner guidance
22
+ - [GitBook knowledge base](https://murray-love-code.gitbook.io/murray-love-code-docs/) — navigable implementation guidance
23
+
24
+ ## Scope
25
+
26
+ The resources support governed enterprise-data-agent evaluation, refusal testing, control workshops, and reproducible implementation planning. The cases are synthetic and are not a substitute for deployment-specific testing, access controls, semantic ownership, data-quality checks, or human oversight.
27
+
28
+ ## Important disclosures
29
+
30
+ This project is independently maintained by Murray Newlands as a personal practitioner resource. It is not official product documentation for Mnemiq or Agentic Fabriq and does not constitute independent certification or validation of any vendor. Mnemiq is included as a publicly inspectable worked case study. Agentic Fabriq develops and maintains Mnemiq, and Murray Newlands advises Agentic Fabriq.
31
+
32
+ The framework is not legal, compliance, or security advice. Organizations must adapt its controls to their own risk, data, jurisdiction, and operating environment.