Spaces:
Configuration error
Configuration error
Delete README.md
Browse files
README.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,468 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
# Observability
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
**Tools, models, datasets, and open workflows for understanding how AI systems behave in production.**
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
Observability is an independent Hugging Face organization focused on **AI observability, LLM tracing, agent monitoring, evaluations, RAG diagnostics, model performance, reliability, cost analysis, and production debugging**.
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
The goal is simple:
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
> **See what your AI system is doing, understand why it behaves that way, and improve it with evidence.**
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
Modern AI systems are increasingly complex. A single application may involve prompts, models, tools, retrieval, agents, external APIs, memory, structured outputs, and multiple decision steps.
|
| 12 |
-
|
| 13 |
-
Observability helps make those systems easier to inspect, measure, debug, and improve.
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
-
---
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
-
## What Is AI Observability?
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
-
AI observability is the practice of collecting and analyzing the signals needed to understand the behavior of AI systems.
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
Depending on the application, this may include:
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
- prompts
|
| 24 |
-
- responses
|
| 25 |
-
- traces
|
| 26 |
-
- tool calls
|
| 27 |
-
- agent steps
|
| 28 |
-
- latency
|
| 29 |
-
- token usage
|
| 30 |
-
- model costs
|
| 31 |
-
- retrieval quality
|
| 32 |
-
- errors
|
| 33 |
-
- retries
|
| 34 |
-
- hallucinations
|
| 35 |
-
- evaluation scores
|
| 36 |
-
- model drift
|
| 37 |
-
- user feedback
|
| 38 |
-
- safety signals
|
| 39 |
-
- structured outputs
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
Traditional monitoring tells you **whether a system is running**.
|
| 42 |
-
|
| 43 |
-
AI observability should also help explain:
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
-
**what happened, why it happened, and where quality was lost.**
|
| 46 |
-
|
| 47 |
-
---
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
-
## Focus Areas
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
### 🔍 LLM Tracing
|
| 52 |
-
|
| 53 |
-
Tools for inspecting:
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
-
- prompts
|
| 56 |
-
- model responses
|
| 57 |
-
- chained calls
|
| 58 |
-
- tool usage
|
| 59 |
-
- retries
|
| 60 |
-
- latency
|
| 61 |
-
- token consumption
|
| 62 |
-
- structured outputs
|
| 63 |
-
- failure points
|
| 64 |
-
|
| 65 |
-
A useful trace should make a complex AI workflow understandable from end to end.
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
### 🤖 Agent Observability
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
-
AI agents introduce additional complexity.
|
| 70 |
-
|
| 71 |
-
Projects may focus on:
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
-
- agent trajectories
|
| 74 |
-
- planning steps
|
| 75 |
-
- tool selection
|
| 76 |
-
- tool execution
|
| 77 |
-
- memory usage
|
| 78 |
-
- loops
|
| 79 |
-
- failed actions
|
| 80 |
-
- execution time
|
| 81 |
-
- cost per task
|
| 82 |
-
- completion quality
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
-
### 📚 RAG Observability
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
-
Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems require visibility into both retrieval and generation.
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
Possible metrics include:
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
- retrieved documents
|
| 91 |
-
- ranking quality
|
| 92 |
-
- context relevance
|
| 93 |
-
- answer groundedness
|
| 94 |
-
- citation coverage
|
| 95 |
-
- retrieval latency
|
| 96 |
-
- chunk quality
|
| 97 |
-
- missing context
|
| 98 |
-
- source usage
|
| 99 |
-
|
| 100 |
-
### 🧪 Evaluations
|
| 101 |
-
|
| 102 |
-
Evaluation should be part of production AI workflows.
|
| 103 |
-
|
| 104 |
-
Possible projects may support:
|
| 105 |
-
|
| 106 |
-
- response quality
|
| 107 |
-
- task success
|
| 108 |
-
- factuality
|
| 109 |
-
- relevance
|
| 110 |
-
- groundedness
|
| 111 |
-
- safety
|
| 112 |
-
- instruction following
|
| 113 |
-
- structured-output validity
|
| 114 |
-
- regression testing
|
| 115 |
-
- human review
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
-
### 📊 Model Monitoring
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
Observe model behavior over time using signals such as:
|
| 120 |
-
|
| 121 |
-
- latency
|
| 122 |
-
- error rates
|
| 123 |
-
- output distributions
|
| 124 |
-
- response length
|
| 125 |
-
- refusal rates
|
| 126 |
-
- token usage
|
| 127 |
-
- quality scores
|
| 128 |
-
- model version
|
| 129 |
-
- provider performance
|
| 130 |
-
|
| 131 |
-
### 💰 Cost Observability
|
| 132 |
-
|
| 133 |
-
AI costs can become difficult to understand across models and workflows.
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
Possible tools may track:
|
| 136 |
-
|
| 137 |
-
- input tokens
|
| 138 |
-
- output tokens
|
| 139 |
-
- model usage
|
| 140 |
-
- cost per request
|
| 141 |
-
- cost per user
|
| 142 |
-
- cost per workflow
|
| 143 |
-
- cost per successful task
|
| 144 |
-
- provider comparison
|
| 145 |
-
- caching impact
|
| 146 |
-
|
| 147 |
-
### ⚡ Performance & Reliability
|
| 148 |
-
|
| 149 |
-
Useful metrics may include:
|
| 150 |
-
|
| 151 |
-
- time to first token
|
| 152 |
-
- total latency
|
| 153 |
-
- throughput
|
| 154 |
-
- error rate
|
| 155 |
-
- timeout rate
|
| 156 |
-
- retry rate
|
| 157 |
-
- availability
|
| 158 |
-
- provider failures
|
| 159 |
-
- fallback behavior
|
| 160 |
-
|
| 161 |
-
### 🛡️ Safety Observability
|
| 162 |
-
|
| 163 |
-
Possible projects may help surface:
|
| 164 |
-
|
| 165 |
-
- unsafe outputs
|
| 166 |
-
- policy violations
|
| 167 |
-
- prompt injection
|
| 168 |
-
- jailbreak attempts
|
| 169 |
-
- sensitive-data exposure
|
| 170 |
-
- anomalous tool calls
|
| 171 |
-
- unexpected agent behavior
|
| 172 |
-
- moderation events
|
| 173 |
-
|
| 174 |
-
### 🔄 Model & Prompt Changes
|
| 175 |
-
|
| 176 |
-
AI applications change frequently.
|
| 177 |
-
|
| 178 |
-
Observability can help compare:
|
| 179 |
-
|
| 180 |
-
- model versions
|
| 181 |
-
- prompt versions
|
| 182 |
-
- retrieval pipelines
|
| 183 |
-
- system instructions
|
| 184 |
-
- tool configurations
|
| 185 |
-
- temperature settings
|
| 186 |
-
- provider changes
|
| 187 |
-
|
| 188 |
-
---
|
| 189 |
-
|
| 190 |
-
## Possible Spaces
|
| 191 |
-
|
| 192 |
-
### 🔍 LLM Trace Viewer
|
| 193 |
-
Visualize prompts, responses, tool calls, latency, and token usage for a single AI workflow.
|
| 194 |
-
|
| 195 |
-
### 🤖 Agent Trace Explorer
|
| 196 |
-
Inspect agent trajectories and understand which actions led to success or failure.
|
| 197 |
-
|
| 198 |
-
### 📚 RAG Quality Checker
|
| 199 |
-
Evaluate retrieval relevance, context coverage, and answer grounding.
|
| 200 |
-
|
| 201 |
-
### 🧪 Prompt Evaluation Dashboard
|
| 202 |
-
Compare prompt versions using consistent test cases and metrics.
|
| 203 |
-
|
| 204 |
-
### 📊 Model Comparison
|
| 205 |
-
Compare multiple models across quality, latency, token usage, and cost.
|
| 206 |
-
|
| 207 |
-
### 💰 Token Cost Calculator
|
| 208 |
-
Estimate and compare LLM usage costs across models and workloads.
|
| 209 |
-
|
| 210 |
-
### ⚡ Latency Analyzer
|
| 211 |
-
Analyze response times, bottlenecks, retries, and provider performance.
|
| 212 |
-
|
| 213 |
-
### 🧠 Hallucination Review Tool
|
| 214 |
-
Structure manual or automated review of unsupported model claims.
|
| 215 |
-
|
| 216 |
-
### 🛡️ AI Safety Monitor
|
| 217 |
-
Track safety-related events and suspicious interactions.
|
| 218 |
-
|
| 219 |
-
### 🔄 Regression Test Runner
|
| 220 |
-
Run repeatable evaluation sets after model, prompt, or pipeline changes.
|
| 221 |
-
|
| 222 |
-
### 📈 Drift Explorer
|
| 223 |
-
Compare output behavior across time periods, model versions, or datasets.
|
| 224 |
-
|
| 225 |
-
### 🧰 Observability Playground
|
| 226 |
-
Experiment with traces, metrics, evaluations, and monitoring workflows in one place.
|
| 227 |
-
|
| 228 |
-
---
|
| 229 |
-
|
| 230 |
-
## Why Observability Matters
|
| 231 |
-
|
| 232 |
-
AI systems can fail in ways that are difficult to detect with traditional application monitoring.
|
| 233 |
-
|
| 234 |
-
A request may return successfully while the actual result is:
|
| 235 |
-
|
| 236 |
-
- irrelevant
|
| 237 |
-
- incomplete
|
| 238 |
-
- hallucinated
|
| 239 |
-
- poorly grounded
|
| 240 |
-
- too expensive
|
| 241 |
-
- too slow
|
| 242 |
-
- based on the wrong document
|
| 243 |
-
- produced by an unintended tool sequence
|
| 244 |
-
|
| 245 |
-
That means operational health alone is not enough.
|
| 246 |
-
|
| 247 |
-
Teams need visibility into:
|
| 248 |
-
|
| 249 |
-
**quality + behavior + performance + cost + reliability**
|
| 250 |
-
|
| 251 |
-
---
|
| 252 |
-
|
| 253 |
-
## Metrics We Care About
|
| 254 |
-
|
| 255 |
-
### Quality
|
| 256 |
-
- task success
|
| 257 |
-
- relevance
|
| 258 |
-
- factuality
|
| 259 |
-
- groundedness
|
| 260 |
-
- completeness
|
| 261 |
-
- instruction adherence
|
| 262 |
-
|
| 263 |
-
### Retrieval
|
| 264 |
-
- context relevance
|
| 265 |
-
- source coverage
|
| 266 |
-
- ranking quality
|
| 267 |
-
- retrieval success
|
| 268 |
-
|
| 269 |
-
### Performance
|
| 270 |
-
- latency
|
| 271 |
-
- throughput
|
| 272 |
-
- time to first token
|
| 273 |
-
- timeout rate
|
| 274 |
-
|
| 275 |
-
### Reliability
|
| 276 |
-
- errors
|
| 277 |
-
- retries
|
| 278 |
-
- fallback usage
|
| 279 |
-
- failed tool calls
|
| 280 |
-
|
| 281 |
-
### Cost
|
| 282 |
-
- tokens
|
| 283 |
-
- request cost
|
| 284 |
-
- workflow cost
|
| 285 |
-
- cost per successful task
|
| 286 |
-
|
| 287 |
-
### Safety
|
| 288 |
-
- policy events
|
| 289 |
-
- injection attempts
|
| 290 |
-
- unsafe outputs
|
| 291 |
-
- sensitive information exposure
|
| 292 |
-
|
| 293 |
-
### User Experience
|
| 294 |
-
- ratings
|
| 295 |
-
- corrections
|
| 296 |
-
- retries
|
| 297 |
-
- abandonment
|
| 298 |
-
- feedback
|
| 299 |
-
|
| 300 |
-
---
|
| 301 |
-
|
| 302 |
-
## AI Evaluation Philosophy
|
| 303 |
-
|
| 304 |
-
A single score rarely tells the whole story.
|
| 305 |
-
|
| 306 |
-
Good evaluation should combine multiple signals:
|
| 307 |
-
|
| 308 |
-
**automated metrics + model-based evaluation + deterministic checks + human review**
|
| 309 |
-
|
| 310 |
-
Different tasks require different evaluation methods.
|
| 311 |
-
|
| 312 |
-
For example:
|
| 313 |
-
|
| 314 |
-
- JSON output → schema validation
|
| 315 |
-
- retrieval → relevance evaluation
|
| 316 |
-
- summarization → completeness and factuality
|
| 317 |
-
- agents → task completion and action quality
|
| 318 |
-
- classification → precision and recall
|
| 319 |
-
- customer support → resolution quality and user feedback
|
| 320 |
-
|
| 321 |
-
---
|
| 322 |
-
|
| 323 |
-
## OpenTelemetry & Open Standards
|
| 324 |
-
|
| 325 |
-
Where useful, projects may explore interoperability with open standards and common telemetry formats.
|
| 326 |
-
|
| 327 |
-
Potential areas include:
|
| 328 |
-
|
| 329 |
-
- traces
|
| 330 |
-
- spans
|
| 331 |
-
- metrics
|
| 332 |
-
- logs
|
| 333 |
-
- OpenTelemetry
|
| 334 |
-
- distributed tracing
|
| 335 |
-
- structured events
|
| 336 |
-
- trace context
|
| 337 |
-
- model metadata
|
| 338 |
-
|
| 339 |
-
The goal is to make AI observability easier to integrate into existing engineering workflows.
|
| 340 |
-
|
| 341 |
-
---
|
| 342 |
-
|
| 343 |
-
## Technology
|
| 344 |
-
|
| 345 |
-
Projects may use:
|
| 346 |
-
|
| 347 |
-
- Hugging Face Transformers
|
| 348 |
-
- Hugging Face Datasets
|
| 349 |
-
- Hugging Face Spaces
|
| 350 |
-
- open-weight models
|
| 351 |
-
- OpenTelemetry
|
| 352 |
-
- tracing systems
|
| 353 |
-
- vector databases
|
| 354 |
-
- evaluation frameworks
|
| 355 |
-
- structured logging
|
| 356 |
-
- Python
|
| 357 |
-
- JavaScript
|
| 358 |
-
- browser-based visualization
|
| 359 |
-
- SQL / analytics pipelines
|
| 360 |
-
- dashboards
|
| 361 |
-
- custom metrics
|
| 362 |
-
|
| 363 |
-
Not every observability problem requires AI.
|
| 364 |
-
|
| 365 |
-
Where deterministic checks or conventional telemetry are more reliable, they should be preferred.
|
| 366 |
-
|
| 367 |
-
---
|
| 368 |
-
|
| 369 |
-
## Principles
|
| 370 |
-
|
| 371 |
-
### 👁️ Make Behavior Visible
|
| 372 |
-
AI systems should not operate as unexplained black boxes.
|
| 373 |
-
|
| 374 |
-
### 📏 Measure What Matters
|
| 375 |
-
Collect metrics that reflect real application quality, not just infrastructure health.
|
| 376 |
-
|
| 377 |
-
### 🔗 Preserve Context
|
| 378 |
-
Traces should connect prompts, retrieval, tools, models, and outputs.
|
| 379 |
-
|
| 380 |
-
### 🧪 Evaluate Continuously
|
| 381 |
-
Evaluation should happen before deployment and continue in production.
|
| 382 |
-
|
| 383 |
-
### 💰 Track Cost Alongside Quality
|
| 384 |
-
A more expensive model is not automatically a better production choice.
|
| 385 |
-
|
| 386 |
-
### 🔐 Protect Sensitive Data
|
| 387 |
-
Observability data can contain prompts, user input, business data, or personal information.
|
| 388 |
-
|
| 389 |
-
Data collection should be minimized, protected, and documented.
|
| 390 |
-
|
| 391 |
-
### 🔎 Prefer Evidence Over Guessing
|
| 392 |
-
Debugging should be based on traces, metrics, evaluations, and reproducible examples.
|
| 393 |
-
|
| 394 |
-
---
|
| 395 |
-
|
| 396 |
-
## Who Is Observability For?
|
| 397 |
-
|
| 398 |
-
This organization may be useful for:
|
| 399 |
-
|
| 400 |
-
- AI engineers
|
| 401 |
-
- ML engineers
|
| 402 |
-
- LLM application developers
|
| 403 |
-
- agent developers
|
| 404 |
-
- MLOps teams
|
| 405 |
-
- platform engineers
|
| 406 |
-
- reliability engineers
|
| 407 |
-
- evaluation teams
|
| 408 |
-
- AI safety teams
|
| 409 |
-
- data scientists
|
| 410 |
-
- startups
|
| 411 |
-
- enterprise AI teams
|
| 412 |
-
- researchers
|
| 413 |
-
- developers building AI infrastructure
|
| 414 |
-
|
| 415 |
-
---
|
| 416 |
-
|
| 417 |
-
## Responsible Use
|
| 418 |
-
|
| 419 |
-
Observability systems may capture sensitive information.
|
| 420 |
-
|
| 421 |
-
Projects should consider:
|
| 422 |
-
|
| 423 |
-
- data minimization
|
| 424 |
-
- access control
|
| 425 |
-
- retention
|
| 426 |
-
- redaction
|
| 427 |
-
- encryption
|
| 428 |
-
- prompt privacy
|
| 429 |
-
- user consent
|
| 430 |
-
- regulatory requirements
|
| 431 |
-
- model-provider policies
|
| 432 |
-
|
| 433 |
-
Monitoring should improve reliability without creating unnecessary privacy risk.
|
| 434 |
-
|
| 435 |
-
---
|
| 436 |
-
|
| 437 |
-
## Important Notice
|
| 438 |
-
|
| 439 |
-
Tools, models, and datasets published here are provided for **research, development, testing, monitoring, and technical experimentation**.
|
| 440 |
-
|
| 441 |
-
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, they do not guarantee:
|
| 442 |
-
|
| 443 |
-
- model correctness
|
| 444 |
-
- production reliability
|
| 445 |
-
- security
|
| 446 |
-
- regulatory compliance
|
| 447 |
-
- privacy compliance
|
| 448 |
-
- complete detection of failures
|
| 449 |
-
- complete detection of hallucinations
|
| 450 |
-
- complete detection of unsafe behavior
|
| 451 |
-
|
| 452 |
-
AI observability should support qualified engineering and operational review.
|
| 453 |
-
|
| 454 |
-
---
|
| 455 |
-
|
| 456 |
-
## Independent Organization
|
| 457 |
-
|
| 458 |
-
**Observability is an independent Hugging Face community organization.**
|
| 459 |
-
|
| 460 |
-
It is not an official Hugging Face organization, standards body, monitoring vendor, or certification authority.
|
| 461 |
-
|
| 462 |
-
The name **Observability** describes the thematic focus of the organization and its projects.
|
| 463 |
-
|
| 464 |
-
---
|
| 465 |
-
|
| 466 |
-
# Observability
|
| 467 |
-
|
| 468 |
-
**Trace behavior. Measure quality. Improve AI systems.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|