renderfy commited on
Commit
db63e8a
·
0 Parent(s):

VoiceHaul: long-horizon evaluation for empathic voice agents

Browse files
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. README.md +69 -0
  2. index.html +0 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ title: VoiceHaul
3
+ emoji: 🎚️
4
+ colorFrom: green
5
+ colorTo: gray
6
+ sdk: static
7
+ app_file: index.html
8
+ pinned: false
9
+ license: apache-2.0
10
+ short_description: Long-horizon evaluation for empathic voice agents
11
+ tags:
12
+ - evaluation
13
+ - benchmark
14
+ - speech
15
+ - conversational-ai
16
+ - reliability
17
+ ---
18
+
19
+ # VoiceHaul
20
+
21
+ **Long-horizon evaluation and failure-onset diagnosis for empathic voice agents.**
22
+
23
+ A turn-level rating tells you whether a response *sounded* right. It cannot tell
24
+ you whether a model still honours what the caller asked for twenty turns ago,
25
+ whether its calibration decays as a session runs long, whether it is regulating
26
+ the caller's affect or mirroring it back, or which turn broke a call that ended
27
+ badly.
28
+
29
+ This measures those four things, then measures how much human-rating budget you
30
+ need before any of them is detectable.
31
+
32
+ ## The result it opens with
33
+
34
+ Five voice policies, scored two ways. A fixed-context turn panel — every policy
35
+ answering the same held-out caller states, each turn rated on its own, the way a
36
+ prompt-set leaderboard works. And the same policies actually holding forty-turn
37
+ conversations.
38
+
39
+ The two rankings are anti-correlated (ρ ≈ −0.90). The turn panel's best model is
40
+ the one that fails every conversation — because a turn panel holds the context
41
+ fixed, and in a real conversation the model creates the context it is later
42
+ scored on.
43
+
44
+ ## What is real and what is simulated
45
+
46
+ **Simulated:** the callers, the policies, and the affect dynamics.
47
+ **Real:** the metrics, the estimators, the statistics, and the failure-onset
48
+ localization algorithm.
49
+
50
+ You cannot validate a measurement instrument without ground truth you control.
51
+ The page is explicit about which claims this can and cannot support, and about
52
+ the four open research questions that follow — each gated on rating data that
53
+ does not exist yet.
54
+
55
+ ## Provenance
56
+
57
+ The measurement design is carried over from two earlier projects and is not new
58
+ work: [LongHaul-Bench](https://github.com/vahit19/LongHaul-Bench), a long-horizon
59
+ agent reliability benchmark over 1,000+ sequential episodes, and
60
+ [Runopsy](https://github.com/vahit19/runopsy), causal failure-onset diagnosis
61
+ with counterfactual replay.
62
+
63
+ Source and the runnable harness (pure standard library, no API key, no network):
64
+ [github.com/vahit19/voicehaul](https://github.com/vahit19/voicehaul)
65
+
66
+ ---
67
+
68
+ Vahit Feryad, PhD — applied AI research engineer, evaluation and reliability.
69
+ Apache-2.0.
index.html ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff