Spaces:
Running
Running
| # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- | |
| """Qualitative evidence preparation for SmartPaper's ASQ-oriented track.""" | |
| from __future__ import annotations | |
| import hashlib | |
| import json | |
| import logging | |
| import re | |
| from config import APP_CONFIG | |
| from core.study_design_contract import ( | |
| STUDY_DESIGN_CONTRACT_VERSION, | |
| build_qualitative_contract, | |
| build_user_research_intent, | |
| ) | |
| class QualitativeEngine: | |
| QUALITATIVE_APPENDIX_MANIFEST_VERSION = "qualitative-appendix-manifest-v1" | |
| TARGET_APPENDIX_BINDING_VERSION = "target-qualitative-appendix-binding-v2" | |
| SEMANTIC_CLAIM_FRAME_VERSION = "smartpaper-core-semantic-claim-frame-v1" | |
| STUDY_DESIGN_CONTRACT_VERSION = STUDY_DESIGN_CONTRACT_VERSION | |
| APPENDIX_FIELDS = ("theme", "concept", "stage", "case_label", "evidence_role") | |
| APPENDIX_CANONICAL_LABEL_FIELDS = ("theme", "concept") | |
| APPENDIX_HEADERS = ( | |
| "Higher-order Theme", "Empirical Concept", "Process Stage", | |
| "Case/Actor", "Evidence Role", "Representative Quote", | |
| ) | |
| _TARGET_APPENDIX_LOCALIZATION = { | |
| "en": { | |
| "heading": "Appendix: Data Structure and Evidence", | |
| "headers": APPENDIX_HEADERS, | |
| }, | |
| "zh": { | |
| "heading": "附录：数据结构与证据", | |
| "headers": ("高阶主题", "经验概念", "过程阶段", "案例/参与者", "证据角色", "代表性引文"), | |
| }, | |
| "ru": { | |
| "heading": "Приложение: Структура данных и доказательства", | |
| "headers": ("Тема высшего порядка", "Эмпирическое понятие", "Этап процесса", "Случай/участник", "Роль доказательства", "Репрезентативная цитата"), | |
| }, | |
| "kk": { | |
| "heading": "Қосымша: Деректер құрылымы және дәлелдер", | |
| "headers": ("Жоғары деңгейлі тақырып", "Эмпирикалық ұғым", "Процесс кезеңі", "Кейс/қатысушы", "Дәлел рөлі", "Репрезентативті дәйексөз"), | |
| }, | |
| } | |
| ALLOWED_ANALYTIC_DESIGNS = { | |
| "Process analysis", | |
| "Comparative case analysis", | |
| "Grounded theory", | |
| "Gioia-style inductive coding", | |
| "Longitudinal qualitative analysis", | |
| "Iterative thematic/process analysis", | |
| } | |
| def __init__(self, agent): | |
| self.agent = agent | |
| def _clean_cell(value, default="Not specified"): | |
| cleaned = str(value or default).replace("\n", " ").strip() | |
| return cleaned or default | |
| def _normalize_analytic_design(cls, value): | |
| cleaned = re.sub(r"\s+", " ", str(value or "")).strip() | |
| if not cleaned: | |
| return "Iterative thematic/process analysis" | |
| lookup = {item.lower(): item for item in cls.ALLOWED_ANALYTIC_DESIGNS} | |
| return lookup.get(cleaned.lower(), "Iterative thematic/process analysis") | |
| def _normalize_string_list(cls, values): | |
| if values is None: | |
| return [] | |
| if not isinstance(values, list): | |
| values = [values] | |
| out = [] | |
| for value in values: | |
| cleaned = cls._clean_cell(value, "") | |
| if cleaned and cleaned.casefold() != "not specified" and cleaned not in out: | |
| out.append(cleaned) | |
| return out | |
| def _normalize_data_source_roles(cls, values): | |
| rows = [] | |
| for item in values or []: | |
| if not isinstance(item, dict): | |
| continue | |
| actor_role = cls._clean_cell(item.get("actor_role"), "") | |
| data_source = cls._clean_cell(item.get("data_source"), "") | |
| count = item.get("count") | |
| if not actor_role or not data_source: | |
| continue | |
| if count is not None and (not isinstance(count, int) or count <= 0): | |
| continue | |
| row = {"actor_role": actor_role, "data_source": data_source, "count": count} | |
| if row not in rows: | |
| rows.append(row) | |
| return rows | |
| def build_qualitative_semantic_claim_frame(cls, metadata): | |
| """Freeze actor/source, process-evidence, and quote identities in one frame. | |
| The frame is server-side authority. It contains no model-inferred prose | |
| meaning and no verbatim quotation payload, only typed identities/hashes. | |
| """ | |
| meta = dict(metadata or {}) | |
| facts = dict(meta.get("study_facts") or {}) | |
| relations = [] | |
| for row in cls._normalize_data_source_roles(facts.get("data_source_roles") or []): | |
| actor = cls._clean_cell(row.get("actor_role"), "") | |
| source = cls._clean_cell(row.get("data_source"), "") | |
| folded = source.casefold() | |
| if "interview" in folded: | |
| family = "interview" | |
| elif "focus" in folded and "group" in folded: | |
| family = "focus_group" | |
| elif "observ" in folded: | |
| family = "observation" | |
| elif "log" in folded: | |
| family = "log" | |
| elif "document" in folded or "archiv" in folded or "record" in folded: | |
| family = "document" | |
| else: | |
| family = "other" | |
| relation = { | |
| "actor_role": actor, | |
| "data_source": source, | |
| "source_family": family, | |
| "count": row.get("count"), | |
| "relation": "EVIDENCED_BY", | |
| } | |
| relation_id_payload = json.dumps(relation, ensure_ascii=False, sort_keys=True, separators=(",", ":")) | |
| relation["relation_id"] = hashlib.sha256(relation_id_payload.encode("utf-8")).hexdigest()[:16] | |
| relations.append(relation) | |
| quotes = [] | |
| for item in meta.get("evidence") or []: | |
| if not isinstance(item, dict): | |
| continue | |
| quote_id = str(item.get("tag") or "").strip() | |
| if not re.fullmatch(r"QUOTE-\d+", quote_id): | |
| continue | |
| quote_hash = str(item.get("quote_hash") or "").strip() | |
| if not quote_hash and str(item.get("quote") or "").strip(): | |
| normalized = re.sub(r"\s+", " ", str(item.get("quote") or "")).strip() | |
| quote_hash = hashlib.sha256(normalized.encode("utf-8")).hexdigest() | |
| quotes.append({ | |
| "quote_id": quote_id, | |
| "quote_hash": quote_hash, | |
| "theme_id": str(item.get("theme_id") or "").strip(), | |
| "stage": cls._clean_cell(item.get("stage")), | |
| "case_label": cls._clean_cell(item.get("case_label")), | |
| "evidence_role": str(item.get("evidence_role") or "typical").strip().lower(), | |
| }) | |
| process_evidence = [] | |
| for theme in meta.get("themes") or []: | |
| if not isinstance(theme, dict): | |
| continue | |
| theme_id = str(theme.get("theme_id") or "").strip() | |
| if not theme_id: | |
| continue | |
| process_evidence.append({ | |
| "theme_id": theme_id, | |
| "stages": [cls._clean_cell(x, "") for x in (theme.get("stages") or []) if cls._clean_cell(x, "")], | |
| "has_deviant_evidence": bool(theme.get("has_deviant_evidence")), | |
| "quote_ids": [ | |
| str(row.get("tag") or "").strip() | |
| for row in (theme.get("evidence") or []) if isinstance(row, dict) and str(row.get("tag") or "").strip() | |
| ], | |
| }) | |
| frame = { | |
| "version": cls.SEMANTIC_CLAIM_FRAME_VERSION, | |
| "mode": "qualitative", | |
| "actor_data_source_relations": sorted(relations, key=lambda row: (row["actor_role"].casefold(), row["data_source"].casefold())), | |
| "process_evidence": sorted(process_evidence, key=lambda row: row["theme_id"]), | |
| "quote_identities": sorted(quotes, key=lambda row: row["quote_id"]), | |
| } | |
| canonical = json.dumps(frame, ensure_ascii=False, sort_keys=True, separators=(",", ":")) | |
| frame["frame_hash"] = hashlib.sha256(canonical.encode("utf-8")).hexdigest() | |
| return frame | |
| def build_scoped_evidence_md( | |
| cls, | |
| metadata, | |
| *, | |
| include_themes=True, | |
| theme_titles=None, | |
| assigned_evidence=None, | |
| include_quotes=False, | |
| include_quote_ids=True, | |
| ): | |
| """Render the minimum qualitative evidence needed by one drafting unit. | |
| Study facts/theme summaries are an internal empirical channel. Verbatim | |
| quotations are a separate channel and are exposed only to their owning | |
| Findings unit (or the final appendix when explicitly requested by the | |
| caller). This prevents a quotation visible in one unit from being | |
| opportunistically reused elsewhere and keeps external literature from | |
| becoming evidence for this study's own facts. | |
| """ | |
| metadata = metadata or {} | |
| facts = metadata.get("study_facts") or {} | |
| sources = facts.get("data_sources") or ["Not specified"] | |
| if not isinstance(sources, list): | |
| sources = [sources] | |
| clean_sources = [cls._clean_cell(item) for item in sources] | |
| participants = facts.get("participant_count") | |
| interviews = facts.get("interview_count") | |
| analytic_design = cls._normalize_analytic_design( | |
| facts.get("analytic_design") or facts.get("analysis_method") | |
| ) | |
| analytic_logic = cls._clean_cell( | |
| facts.get("analytic_logic"), | |
| "Iteratively compare empirical observations to refine a process/mechanism explanation.", | |
| ) | |
| temporal_structure = cls._clean_cell(facts.get("temporal_structure")) | |
| case_structure = cls._clean_cell(facts.get("case_structure")) | |
| setting = cls._clean_cell(facts.get("research_setting")) | |
| data_source_roles = cls._normalize_data_source_roles(facts.get("data_source_roles") or []) | |
| trustworthiness = cls._normalize_string_list(facts.get("trustworthiness_procedures")) | |
| ethics = cls._normalize_string_list(facts.get("ethics_procedures")) | |
| reflexivity = cls._normalize_string_list(facts.get("reflexivity_procedures")) | |
| lines = [ | |
| "### Frozen Qualitative Study Facts", | |
| "| Field | Frozen value |", | |
| "| :--- | :--- |", | |
| f"| Research setting | {setting} |", | |
| f"| Data sources | {', '.join(clean_sources)} |", | |
| f"| Participants | {participants if participants is not None else 'Not specified'} |", | |
| f"| Interviews | {interviews if interviews is not None else 'Not specified'} |", | |
| f"| Analytic design | {analytic_design} |", | |
| f"| Analytic logic | {analytic_logic} |", | |
| f"| Temporal structure | {temporal_structure} |", | |
| f"| Case structure | {case_structure} |", | |
| f"| Trustworthiness procedures | {'; '.join(trustworthiness) if trustworthiness else 'Not specified'} |", | |
| f"| Ethics procedures | {'; '.join(ethics) if ethics else 'Not specified'} |", | |
| f"| Reflexivity procedures | {'; '.join(reflexivity) if reflexivity else 'Not specified'} |", | |
| ] | |
| if data_source_roles: | |
| lines.extend([ | |
| "", | |
| "### Frozen Actor / Data-Source Relations", | |
| "| Actor role | Data source | Count |", | |
| "| :--- | :--- | :--- |", | |
| ]) | |
| lines.extend( | |
| f"| {row['actor_role']} | {row['data_source']} | {row['count'] if row['count'] is not None else 'Not specified'} |" | |
| for row in data_source_roles | |
| ) | |
| lines.extend([ | |
| "", | |
| "[QUALITATIVE EVIDENCE CHANNELS]", | |
| "1. STUDY FACTS and THEME SUMMARIES below are this study's internal empirical evidence. Never attach an external [CITE-XX] tag to a sentence merely because it reports or interprets these frozen facts.", | |
| "2. External literature may support only prior-theory, prior-evidence, or methodological-rationale claims. Keep those claims in distinct sentences from this study's setting, sample, data, events, quotations, and findings.", | |
| "3. ASSIGNED QUOTATIONS, when present, are analysis-only verbatim evidence owned by the current stable theme. Do not reproduce the verbatim wording or any internal quotation identifier in generated prose; the Executor renders frozen quotations deterministically after narrative QA.", | |
| "4. Study-owned trustworthiness, ethics, reflexivity, recruitment, consent, observation, or audit procedures may be stated as performed only when explicitly frozen above. Never convert general methodological best practice into a fact about this study.", | |
| ]) | |
| allowed_theme_titles = None | |
| if theme_titles: | |
| allowed_theme_titles = { | |
| re.sub(r"\s+", " ", str(item or "")).strip().casefold() | |
| for item in theme_titles | |
| if str(item or "").strip() | |
| } | |
| if include_themes: | |
| theme_rows = [] | |
| for theme in metadata.get("themes") or []: | |
| if not isinstance(theme, dict): | |
| continue | |
| title = cls._clean_cell(theme.get("title"), "Emergent pattern") | |
| if allowed_theme_titles is not None and title.casefold() not in allowed_theme_titles: | |
| continue | |
| concepts = ", ".join( | |
| cls._clean_cell(item, "") | |
| for item in (theme.get("concepts") or []) | |
| if cls._clean_cell(item, "") | |
| ) or "Not specified" | |
| stages = ", ".join( | |
| cls._clean_cell(item, "") | |
| for item in (theme.get("stages") or []) | |
| if cls._clean_cell(item, "") and cls._clean_cell(item, "") != "Not specified" | |
| ) or "Not specified" | |
| deviant = "yes" if theme.get("has_deviant_evidence") else "no" | |
| theme_rows.append((title, concepts, stages, deviant)) | |
| if theme_rows: | |
| lines.extend([ | |
| "", | |
| "### Frozen Qualitative Theme Summary", | |
| "| Higher-order Theme | Empirical Concepts | Process Stages | Deviant/Boundary Evidence Present |", | |
| "| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |", | |
| ]) | |
| lines.extend( | |
| f"| {title} | {concepts} | {stages} | {deviant} |" | |
| for title, concepts, stages, deviant in theme_rows | |
| ) | |
| if include_quotes: | |
| evidence_items = assigned_evidence | |
| if evidence_items is None: | |
| evidence_items = metadata.get("evidence") or [] | |
| quote_rows = [] | |
| for item in evidence_items or []: | |
| if not isinstance(item, dict): | |
| continue | |
| tag = cls._clean_cell(item.get("tag"), "") | |
| quote = cls._clean_cell(item.get("quote"), "").replace('"', "'") | |
| if not tag or not quote: | |
| continue | |
| stage = cls._clean_cell(item.get("stage")) | |
| case_label = cls._clean_cell(item.get("case_label")) | |
| evidence_role = str(item.get("evidence_role") or "typical").strip().lower() | |
| if evidence_role not in {"typical", "deviant"}: | |
| evidence_role = "typical" | |
| quote_rows.append((tag, stage, case_label, evidence_role, quote)) | |
| if quote_rows: | |
| lines.extend(["", "### Assigned Qualitative Quotations"]) | |
| if include_quote_ids: | |
| lines.extend([ | |
| "| Tag | Process Stage | Case/Actor | Evidence Role | Verbatim Quote |", | |
| "| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |", | |
| ]) | |
| lines.extend( | |
| f'| {tag} | {stage} | {case_label} | {role} | "{quote}" |' | |
| for tag, stage, case_label, role, quote in quote_rows | |
| ) | |
| else: | |
| lines.extend([ | |
| "| Process Stage | Case/Actor | Evidence Role | Verbatim Quote |", | |
| "| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |", | |
| ]) | |
| lines.extend( | |
| f'| {stage} | {case_label} | {role} | "{quote}" |' | |
| for _tag, stage, case_label, role, quote in quote_rows | |
| ) | |
| return "\n".join(lines).strip() | |
| def _appendix_target_language_code(target_lang): | |
| value = str(target_lang or "").strip().casefold().replace("_", "-") | |
| if value.startswith("zh") or "chinese" in value or "中文" in value or "简体" in value: | |
| return "zh" | |
| if value.startswith("ru") or "russian" in value or "рус" in value: | |
| return "ru" | |
| if value.startswith("kk") or value.startswith("kz") or "kazakh" in value or "қазақ" in value: | |
| return "kk" | |
| return "en" | |
| def build_appendix_manifest(cls, metadata): | |
| """Freeze Appendix row/cell identity before any target-language operation.""" | |
| rows = [] | |
| seen = set() | |
| for index, item in enumerate((metadata or {}).get("evidence") or [], start=1): | |
| if not isinstance(item, dict): | |
| continue | |
| quote = cls._clean_cell(item.get("quote"), "") | |
| if not quote: | |
| continue | |
| quote_id = str(item.get("tag") or "").strip().upper() | |
| if not re.fullmatch(r"QUOTE-\d+", quote_id) or quote_id in seen: | |
| return {} | |
| seen.add(quote_id) | |
| row = { | |
| "row_id": quote_id, | |
| "quote_id": quote_id, | |
| "quote_hash": hashlib.sha256(re.sub(r"\s+", " ", quote).strip().encode("utf-8")).hexdigest(), | |
| "theme": cls._clean_cell(item.get("theme"), "Emergent pattern"), | |
| "concept": cls._clean_cell(item.get("concept"), "Empirical observation"), | |
| "stage": cls._clean_cell(item.get("stage")), | |
| "case_label": cls._clean_cell(item.get("case_label")), | |
| "evidence_role": cls._clean_cell( | |
| str(item.get("evidence_role") or "typical").strip().lower(), "typical" | |
| ), | |
| "quote": quote, | |
| } | |
| rows.append(row) | |
| if not rows: | |
| return {} | |
| manifest = { | |
| "version": cls.QUALITATIVE_APPENDIX_MANIFEST_VERSION, | |
| "columns": list(cls.APPENDIX_HEADERS), | |
| "rows": rows, | |
| } | |
| manifest["manifest_hash"] = cls.appendix_manifest_hash(manifest) | |
| return manifest | |
| def appendix_manifest_hash(cls, manifest): | |
| record = dict(manifest or {}) | |
| record.pop("manifest_hash", None) | |
| payload = json.dumps(record, ensure_ascii=False, sort_keys=True, separators=(",", ":")) | |
| return hashlib.sha256(payload.encode("utf-8")).hexdigest() | |
| def appendix_translation_cells(cls, manifest): | |
| """Return typed non-quote Appendix cells; IDs stay server-side.""" | |
| cells = {} | |
| for row in (manifest or {}).get("rows") or []: | |
| if not isinstance(row, dict): | |
| continue | |
| row_id = str(row.get("row_id") or "").strip() | |
| if not row_id: | |
| continue | |
| for field in cls.APPENDIX_FIELDS: | |
| value = cls._clean_cell(row.get(field), "Not specified") | |
| cells[f"{row_id}:{field}"] = value | |
| return cells | |
| def appendix_translation_plan(cls, manifest, glossary=None): | |
| """Split Appendix cells into server-bound labels and model-owned surfaces. | |
| Theme/concept cells are frozen research labels. When the task-level | |
| canonical glossary already owns their target identity, the translation | |
| model must not rewrite those labels or their internal anchors. Remaining | |
| ordinary cells (stage/case/evidence-role) continue through the typed | |
| translation compiler and are rebound by server-side cell ID. | |
| """ | |
| expected = cls.appendix_translation_cells(manifest) | |
| glossary_value = dict(glossary or {}) | |
| folded_glossary = { | |
| str(key or '').strip().casefold(): str(value or '').strip() | |
| for key, value in glossary_value.items() if str(key or '').strip() and str(value or '').strip() | |
| } | |
| prebound = {} | |
| model_cells = {} | |
| for cell_id, source in expected.items(): | |
| field = str(cell_id or '').rsplit(':', 1)[-1] | |
| canonical_target = str(glossary_value.get(source) or '').strip() | |
| if not canonical_target: | |
| canonical_target = folded_glossary.get(str(source or '').strip().casefold(), '') | |
| if field in cls.APPENDIX_CANONICAL_LABEL_FIELDS and canonical_target: | |
| prebound[cell_id] = canonical_target | |
| else: | |
| model_cells[cell_id] = source | |
| if set(prebound) & set(model_cells) or set(prebound) | set(model_cells) != set(expected): | |
| raise RuntimeError("qualitative_appendix_translation_plan_identity_mismatch") | |
| return prebound, model_cells | |
| def _escape_appendix_markdown_cell(value): | |
| return re.sub(r"\s+", " ", str(value or "").strip()).replace("|", r"\|") | |
| def _validate_appendix_manifest(cls, manifest): | |
| record = dict(manifest or {}) | |
| if record.get("version") != cls.QUALITATIVE_APPENDIX_MANIFEST_VERSION: | |
| return False | |
| if list(record.get("columns") or []) != list(cls.APPENDIX_HEADERS): | |
| return False | |
| rows = [row for row in (record.get("rows") or []) if isinstance(row, dict)] | |
| ids = [str(row.get("row_id") or "") for row in rows] | |
| quote_ids = [str(row.get("quote_id") or "") for row in rows] | |
| if not rows or len(ids) != len(set(ids)) or ids != quote_ids: | |
| return False | |
| if any(not re.fullmatch(r"QUOTE-\d+", item) for item in ids): | |
| return False | |
| expected_hash = str(record.get("manifest_hash") or "") | |
| return bool(expected_hash) and expected_hash == cls.appendix_manifest_hash(record) | |
| def bind_target_language_appendix(cls, manifest, target_lang, cell_translations, quote_translations): | |
| """Render one six-column target Appendix from frozen semantic objects. | |
| Markdown structure, row identity, column identity, and quote identity are | |
| program-owned. The translation model may supply only ordinary cell | |
| surfaces through ``cell_translations``. | |
| """ | |
| if not cls._validate_appendix_manifest(manifest): | |
| raise RuntimeError("target_qualitative_appendix_manifest_invalid") | |
| expected_cells = cls.appendix_translation_cells(manifest) | |
| translations = dict(cell_translations or {}) | |
| if set(translations) != set(expected_cells): | |
| missing = sorted(set(expected_cells) - set(translations)) | |
| extra = sorted(set(translations) - set(expected_cells)) | |
| raise RuntimeError( | |
| f"target_qualitative_appendix_cell_identity_mismatch:missing={missing[:4]} extra={extra[:4]}" | |
| ) | |
| quote_map = dict(quote_translations or {}) | |
| required_quotes = {str(row.get("quote_id") or "") for row in manifest.get("rows") or []} | |
| missing_quotes = sorted(tag for tag in required_quotes if not str(quote_map.get(tag) or "").strip()) | |
| if missing_quotes: | |
| raise RuntimeError(f"target_qualitative_appendix_quote_identity_missing:{missing_quotes[:6]}") | |
| code = cls._appendix_target_language_code(target_lang) | |
| profile = dict(cls._TARGET_APPENDIX_LOCALIZATION.get(code) or cls._TARGET_APPENDIX_LOCALIZATION["en"]) | |
| headers = list(profile.get("headers") or cls.APPENDIX_HEADERS) | |
| heading = str(profile.get("heading") or cls._TARGET_APPENDIX_LOCALIZATION["en"]["heading"]) | |
| lines = [ | |
| "| " + " | ".join(cls._escape_appendix_markdown_cell(item) for item in headers) + " |", | |
| "| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |", | |
| ] | |
| for row in manifest.get("rows") or []: | |
| row_id = str(row.get("row_id") or "") | |
| values = [translations[f"{row_id}:{field}"] for field in cls.APPENDIX_FIELDS] | |
| values.append(quote_map[str(row.get("quote_id") or "")]) | |
| lines.append( | |
| "| " + " | ".join(cls._escape_appendix_markdown_cell(value) for value in values) + " |" | |
| ) | |
| rendered = f"# {heading}\n\n" + "\n".join(lines) | |
| cls.validate_bound_target_appendix(rendered, manifest, target_lang) | |
| return rendered.strip() | |
| def validate_bound_target_appendix(cls, text, manifest, target_lang): | |
| """Fail before DOCX packaging if semantic Appendix identity drifted.""" | |
| if not cls._validate_appendix_manifest(manifest): | |
| raise RuntimeError("target_qualitative_appendix_manifest_invalid") | |
| code = cls._appendix_target_language_code(target_lang) | |
| profile = dict(cls._TARGET_APPENDIX_LOCALIZATION.get(code) or cls._TARGET_APPENDIX_LOCALIZATION["en"]) | |
| heading = str(profile.get("heading") or "") | |
| headers = list(profile.get("headers") or cls.APPENDIX_HEADERS) | |
| value = str(text or "") | |
| heading_pattern = re.compile(rf"(?m)^#\s+{re.escape(heading)}\s*$") | |
| matches = list(heading_pattern.finditer(value)) | |
| if len(matches) != 1: | |
| raise RuntimeError("target_qualitative_appendix_heading_identity_missing_or_ambiguous") | |
| tail = value[matches[0].end():] | |
| table_blocks = re.findall(r"(?m)(?:^[ \t]*\|[^\n]+\|[ \t]*$\n?)+", tail) | |
| valid_blocks = [] | |
| for block in table_blocks: | |
| lines = [line.strip() for line in block.splitlines() if line.strip().startswith("|")] | |
| if not lines: | |
| continue | |
| if all(len(re.findall(r"(?<!\\)\|", line)) == 7 for line in lines): | |
| valid_blocks.append(lines) | |
| if len(valid_blocks) != 1: | |
| raise RuntimeError("target_qualitative_appendix_semantic_table_identity_missing_or_ambiguous") | |
| lines = valid_blocks[0] | |
| expected_rows = len(manifest.get("rows") or []) + 2 | |
| if len(lines) != expected_rows: | |
| raise RuntimeError( | |
| f"target_qualitative_appendix_row_identity_mismatch:expected={expected_rows} got={len(lines)}" | |
| ) | |
| expected_header = "| " + " | ".join(cls._escape_appendix_markdown_cell(item) for item in headers) + " |" | |
| if lines[0] != expected_header or not re.fullmatch( | |
| r"\|\s*:---\s*\|\s*:---\s*\|\s*:---\s*\|\s*:---\s*\|\s*:---\s*\|\s*:---\s*\|", | |
| lines[1], | |
| ): | |
| raise RuntimeError("target_qualitative_appendix_column_identity_mismatch") | |
| if re.search(r"\bQUOTE-\d+\b", "\n".join(lines), flags=re.I): | |
| raise RuntimeError("target_qualitative_appendix_internal_quote_id_leak") | |
| return True | |
| def build_appendix_evidence_md(cls, metadata): | |
| """Render the reader-facing English Appendix from the same frozen manifest.""" | |
| manifest = cls.build_appendix_manifest(metadata) | |
| if not cls._validate_appendix_manifest(manifest): | |
| raise RuntimeError("qualitative_appendix_manifest_invalid") | |
| lines = [ | |
| "| " + " | ".join(cls.APPENDIX_HEADERS) + " |", | |
| "| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |", | |
| ] | |
| for row in manifest.get("rows") or []: | |
| values = [row.get(field) for field in cls.APPENDIX_FIELDS] + [f'"{row.get("quote")}"'] | |
| lines.append( | |
| "| " + " | ".join(cls._escape_appendix_markdown_cell(value) for value in values) + " |" | |
| ) | |
| return "\n".join(lines).strip() | |
| def _intent_data_source_family(value): | |
| folded = re.sub(r"\s+", " ", str(value or "")).strip().casefold() | |
| if re.search(r"interview|访谈|интервью|сұхбат", folded): | |
| return "interview" | |
| if re.search(r"focus.{0,4}(?:group|групп|топ)|焦点小组", folded): | |
| return "focus_group" | |
| if re.search(r"observ|观察|наблюден|бақылау", folded): | |
| return "observation" | |
| if re.search(r"archiv|document|档案|文档|文件|архив|документ|мұрағат|құжат", folded): | |
| return "document" | |
| if re.search(r"field.{0,4}note|田野笔记|полев.{0,6}замет|далалық.{0,6}жазб", folded): | |
| return "field_note" | |
| if re.search(r"digital.{0,4}trace|数字痕迹|цифров.{0,6}след|цифрлық.{0,6}із", folded): | |
| return "digital_trace" | |
| if re.search(r"\blog(?:s)?\b|日志|\bлог\b", folded): | |
| return "log" | |
| return "other" | |
| def _build_request(self, topic, keywords, raw_interviews): | |
| user_intent = build_user_research_intent(topic, keywords, mode="qualitative") | |
| intent_block = json.dumps(user_intent, ensure_ascii=False) | |
| schema = """Return ONLY one valid JSON object with this schema: | |
| { | |
| "study_facts": { | |
| "research_setting": "string or Not specified", | |
| "data_sources": ["string"], | |
| "data_source_roles": [{"actor_role":"string", "data_source":"string", "count":integer or null}], | |
| "participant_count": integer or null, | |
| "interview_count": integer or null, | |
| "trustworthiness_procedures": ["explicitly supported/frozen procedure"], | |
| "ethics_procedures": ["explicitly supported/frozen procedure"], | |
| "reflexivity_procedures": ["explicitly supported/frozen procedure"], | |
| "analytic_design": "one allowed design", | |
| "analytic_logic": "one concise sentence", | |
| "temporal_structure": "string or Not specified", | |
| "case_structure": "string or Not specified" | |
| }, | |
| "evidence": [ | |
| { | |
| "theme": "higher-order pattern/theme", | |
| "concept": "empirical concept", | |
| "quote": "verbatim quotation", | |
| "stage": "temporal/process stage or Not specified", | |
| "case_label": "generic case/actor label or Not specified", | |
| "evidence_role": "typical or deviant" | |
| } | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| Allowed analytic designs: Process analysis; Comparative case analysis; Grounded theory; Gioia-style inductive coding; Longitudinal qualitative analysis; Iterative thematic/process analysis. | |
| """ | |
| if raw_interviews and len(raw_interviews) > 100: | |
| return f"""Topic: {topic} | |
| Keywords: {keywords} | |
| <USER_RESEARCH_INTENT>{intent_block}</USER_RESEARCH_INTENT> | |
| Analyze the supplied interview or field material for an ASQ-oriented qualitative manuscript. | |
| Rules: | |
| 0. USER RESEARCH INTENT AUTHORITY: Preserve the user's research phenomenon, explicitly requested qualitative design, data-source family, temporal scope, actor/population, and context when the supplied material supports them. Never silently substitute a different method or phenomenon merely because literature or a generic template is easier. If the supplied material genuinely conflicts with the requested design, preserve evidence truth rather than inventing support; the deterministic validator will surface the conflict. | |
| 1. Treat the supplied material as the only source of study facts. Use null, empty arrays, or "Not specified" for any setting, sample, count, date, case, actor/data-source relation, trustworthiness procedure, ethics procedure, reflexivity procedure, or data source not explicitly supported by the material. | |
| 2. Extract 8-15 representative quotations VERBATIM. Never repair, paraphrase, translate, combine, or invent a quotation. | |
| 3. Choose the analytic design that best fits the actual material. Do NOT default to Gioia. Use Gioia-style coding only if the evidence structure genuinely warrants it. | |
| 4. Organize evidence around a central organizational puzzle and, when the material supports it, preserve temporal stages, actor/case contrasts, process transitions, and at least one deviant or boundary observation. | |
| 5. Do not manufacture a longitudinal sequence when the material is cross-sectional, and do not manufacture multiple cases when only one is present. | |
| 6. Freeze actor-to-data-source relations explicitly in data_source_roles whenever the material supports them (for example extension officers -> interviews; farmers -> focus groups). Never infer that an actor participated in a data source not supported by the material. The study_facts object and quotations will become the frozen single source of truth for the entire manuscript. | |
| {schema} | |
| <QUALITATIVE_MATERIAL> | |
| {raw_interviews[:30000]} | |
| </QUALITATIVE_MATERIAL> | |
| """ | |
| return f"""Topic: {topic} | |
| Keywords: {keywords} | |
| <USER_RESEARCH_INTENT>{intent_block}</USER_RESEARCH_INTENT> | |
| Construct one internally coherent qualitative evidence packet for a complete ASQ-oriented manuscript because no interview material was supplied. | |
| Rules: | |
| 0. USER RESEARCH INTENT AUTHORITY: The topic/keywords define what the study is asked to investigate. If they explicitly request an analytic design (for example grounded theory, thematic analysis, comparative case, process, longitudinal, or Gioia) or a data-source family (for example interviews, focus groups, observation, documents), preserve that request in the generated evidence packet. Sparse literature is not a reason to substitute another method. | |
| 1. Choose one generic organizational research setting directly relevant to the topic and keep it fixed. Do not name a real organization, institution, or identifiable person. | |
| 2. Freeze one participant count, interview count, data-source set, actor-to-data-source relation map, analytic design, temporal/case structure, and analytic logic. Keep them internally consistent. Every actor/data-source relationship later stated in the paper must be represented in data_source_roles. | |
| 3. Produce exactly 12 natural representative quotations distributed across at least three higher-order themes. Quotations must sound like distinct participants rather than repeated template variants. | |
| 4. Choose the analytic design that best fits the constructed evidence; do NOT default to Gioia. Use process, comparative-case, grounded-theory, longitudinal, or Gioia-style logic only when the packet supports it. | |
| 5. Include at least one clearly labelled deviant/boundary observation so the eventual theory is not built only from confirming examples. | |
| 6. The evidence should support a process/mechanism explanation, not merely descriptive topic categories. | |
| 7. Freeze concise, internally coherent trustworthiness, ethics, and reflexivity procedures in their typed arrays so later Methods prose has an explicit study-owned source. Do not name a real ethics board, institution, vendor, approval number, or identifiable organization. | |
| 8. The study_facts object and evidence packet will become the frozen single source of truth for the entire manuscript. | |
| 9. Avoid decorative language, generic AI phrasing, and repetitive quotation patterns. | |
| 10. Keep the JSON compact: each representative quotation should be one concise complete sentence; keep labels short, analytic_logic to one sentence, and each procedure array to at most three concise items. Do not add explanatory prose outside the required fields. | |
| {schema} | |
| """ | |
| def _quote_has_substantive_content(value): | |
| """Language-aware minimum-content gate for participant quotations. | |
| The previous whitespace-token rule rejected ordinary Chinese sentences | |
| because an entire CJK sentence can contain zero spaces. Article Agent | |
| supports Chinese/English/Russian/Kazakh, so accept either four or more | |
| whitespace-delimited tokens or a substantive CJK character sequence. | |
| """ | |
| quote = re.sub(r"\s+", " ", str(value or "")).strip() | |
| if not quote: | |
| return False | |
| if len(quote.split()) >= 4: | |
| return True | |
| cjk_chars = re.findall(r"[\u3400-\u4dbf\u4e00-\u9fff]", quote) | |
| return len(cjk_chars) >= 8 | |
| def _study_facts_validation_error(self, facts, *, has_user_data, user_intent=None): | |
| """Validate frozen qualitative study facts without repairing model output.""" | |
| if not isinstance(facts, dict): | |
| return "invalid_study_facts_schema" | |
| for key in ("participant_count", "interview_count"): | |
| value = facts.get(key) | |
| if value is not None and (not isinstance(value, int) or value <= 0): | |
| return f"invalid_{key}" | |
| raw_relations = facts.get("data_source_roles") or [] | |
| if raw_relations and not isinstance(raw_relations, list): | |
| return "invalid_data_source_roles" | |
| declared_sources = [ | |
| re.sub(r"\s+", " ", str(item or "")).strip().casefold() | |
| for item in (facts.get("data_sources") or []) | |
| if str(item or "").strip() | |
| ] | |
| for item in raw_relations: | |
| if not isinstance(item, dict) or not str(item.get("actor_role") or "").strip() or not str(item.get("data_source") or "").strip(): | |
| return "invalid_data_source_role_item" | |
| count = item.get("count") | |
| if count is not None and (not isinstance(count, int) or count <= 0): | |
| return "invalid_data_source_role_count" | |
| relation_source = re.sub(r"\s+", " ", str(item.get("data_source") or "")).strip().casefold() | |
| if declared_sources and not any( | |
| relation_source == source or relation_source in source or source in relation_source | |
| for source in declared_sources | |
| ): | |
| return "data_source_role_not_in_declared_sources" | |
| for key in ("trustworthiness_procedures", "ethics_procedures", "reflexivity_procedures"): | |
| value = facts.get(key) or [] | |
| if not isinstance(value, list): | |
| return f"invalid_{key}" | |
| if any(not str(item or "").strip() for item in value): | |
| return f"invalid_{key}" | |
| if not has_user_data: | |
| if not raw_relations: | |
| return "generated_packet_missing_data_source_roles" | |
| for key in ("trustworthiness_procedures", "ethics_procedures", "reflexivity_procedures"): | |
| if not (facts.get(key) or []): | |
| return f"generated_packet_missing_{key}" | |
| intent = dict(user_intent or {}) | |
| requested_design = str(intent.get("qualitative_design") or "").strip() | |
| if requested_design: | |
| observed_design = self._normalize_analytic_design(facts.get("analytic_design") or facts.get("analysis_method")) | |
| if observed_design.casefold() != requested_design.casefold(): | |
| return f"user_intent_analytic_design_mismatch:{observed_design}->{requested_design}" | |
| requested_sources = set(intent.get("qualitative_data_source_families") or []) | |
| if requested_sources: | |
| observed_sources = {self._intent_data_source_family(item) for item in (facts.get("data_sources") or [])} | |
| missing_sources = sorted(requested_sources - observed_sources) | |
| if missing_sources: | |
| return "user_intent_data_source_mismatch:" + ",".join(missing_sources) | |
| return "" | |
| def _qualitative_packet_validation_error(self, data, *, has_user_data, user_intent=None): | |
| """Return a bounded local validation reason, or an empty string when safe. | |
| The validator never repairs JSON, invents quotations, or mutates model | |
| output. A completed but unsafe response is discarded and, when | |
| appropriate, regenerated through smaller structured stages. | |
| """ | |
| if not isinstance(data, dict): | |
| return "packet_not_json_object" | |
| facts = data.get("study_facts") or {} | |
| evidence = data.get("evidence") or data.get("quotes") or [] | |
| if not isinstance(facts, dict) or not isinstance(evidence, list): | |
| return "invalid_packet_schema" | |
| facts_reason = self._study_facts_validation_error( | |
| facts, | |
| has_user_data=has_user_data, | |
| user_intent=user_intent, | |
| ) | |
| if facts_reason: | |
| return facts_reason | |
| seen_quotes = set() | |
| theme_keys = set() | |
| retained = 0 | |
| has_deviant = False | |
| for item in evidence[:15]: | |
| if not isinstance(item, dict): | |
| continue | |
| quote = self._clean_cell(item.get("quote"), "").replace('"', "'") | |
| normalized_quote = re.sub(r"\s+", " ", quote).strip().casefold() | |
| if not self._quote_has_substantive_content(quote) or normalized_quote in seen_quotes: | |
| continue | |
| seen_quotes.add(normalized_quote) | |
| retained += 1 | |
| theme = self._clean_cell(item.get("theme"), "Emergent pattern") | |
| theme_keys.add(re.sub(r"\s+", " ", theme).strip().casefold()) | |
| if str(item.get("evidence_role") or "typical").strip().lower() == "deviant": | |
| has_deviant = True | |
| validation = APP_CONFIG.get("manuscript_validation", {}) | |
| minimum_themes = int(validation.get("minimum_qualitative_themes", 3)) | |
| minimum_quotes = int(validation.get("minimum_qualitative_quotes", 8)) | |
| if len(theme_keys) < minimum_themes or retained < minimum_quotes: | |
| return f"incomplete_packet_themes_{len(theme_keys)}_quotes_{retained}" | |
| if not has_user_data and not has_deviant: | |
| return "generated_packet_missing_deviant_evidence" | |
| return "" | |
| def _theme_plan_validation_error(value): | |
| if not isinstance(value, list): | |
| return "invalid_theme_plan" | |
| cleaned = [re.sub(r"\s+", " ", str(item or "")).strip() for item in value] | |
| cleaned = [item for item in cleaned if item] | |
| unique = {item.casefold() for item in cleaned} | |
| if len(unique) < 3: | |
| return "incomplete_theme_plan" | |
| return "" | |
| def _call_qualitative_json(self, system_prompt, prompt, *, max_tokens): | |
| """Make one bounded structured call and parse it strictly; never repair JSON.""" | |
| response = self.agent.call_deepseek( | |
| system_prompt, | |
| prompt, | |
| max_tokens=max_tokens, | |
| temp=0.0, | |
| model_role="reasoning", | |
| thinking=False, | |
| allow_fallback=False, | |
| response_format={"type": "json_object"}, | |
| logical_node="structured_json", | |
| ) | |
| response = re.sub( | |
| r"<think>.*?</think>", | |
| "", | |
| str(response or ""), | |
| flags=re.DOTALL, | |
| ).strip() | |
| return self.agent._extract_json_from_text(response) | |
| def _build_study_facts_stage_request(self, topic, keywords, raw_interviews, user_intent): | |
| intent_block = json.dumps(user_intent, ensure_ascii=False) | |
| facts_schema = """Return ONLY one valid JSON object with this schema: | |
| { | |
| "study_facts": { | |
| "research_setting": "string or Not specified", | |
| "data_sources": ["string"], | |
| "data_source_roles": [{"actor_role":"string", "data_source":"string", "count":integer or null}], | |
| "participant_count": integer or null, | |
| "interview_count": integer or null, | |
| "trustworthiness_procedures": ["concise procedure"], | |
| "ethics_procedures": ["concise procedure"], | |
| "reflexivity_procedures": ["concise procedure"], | |
| "analytic_design": "one allowed design", | |
| "analytic_logic": "one concise sentence", | |
| "temporal_structure": "string or Not specified", | |
| "case_structure": "string or Not specified" | |
| }, | |
| "theme_plan": ["concise theme 1", "concise theme 2", "concise theme 3"] | |
| } | |
| Allowed analytic designs: Process analysis; Comparative case analysis; Grounded theory; Gioia-style inductive coding; Longitudinal qualitative analysis; Iterative thematic/process analysis. | |
| """ | |
| if raw_interviews and len(raw_interviews) > 100: | |
| material_block = f"""Use ONLY the supplied qualitative material as the source of study facts. Use null, empty arrays, or \"Not specified\" when the material does not support a fact. Preserve the user's requested design/data-source family only when evidence truth permits it. Do not invent actors, counts, procedures, cases, dates, or settings. The theme_plan must contain at least three concise evidence-grounded higher-order themes and must not contain quotations. | |
| <QUALITATIVE_MATERIAL> | |
| {raw_interviews[:30000]} | |
| </QUALITATIVE_MATERIAL>""" | |
| else: | |
| material_block = """No interview material was supplied. Construct one generic, internally coherent organizational qualitative study directly relevant to the topic. Do not name a real organization or identifiable person. Freeze one coherent setting, sample/data-source structure, analytic design, procedures, temporal/case structure, and at least three concise higher-order themes. Keep every field compact.""" | |
| return f"""Topic: {topic} | |
| Keywords: {keywords} | |
| <USER_RESEARCH_INTENT>{intent_block}</USER_RESEARCH_INTENT> | |
| This is FALLBACK STAGE A. Produce STUDY FACTS and a compact THEME PLAN only. Do not produce quotations or an evidence array. | |
| {material_block} | |
| {facts_schema} | |
| """ | |
| def _build_evidence_stage_request( | |
| self, | |
| topic, | |
| keywords, | |
| raw_interviews, | |
| user_intent, | |
| *, | |
| facts, | |
| theme_plan, | |
| prior_reason="", | |
| ): | |
| intent_block = json.dumps(user_intent, ensure_ascii=False) | |
| facts_block = json.dumps(facts, ensure_ascii=False, separators=(",", ":")) | |
| themes_block = json.dumps(theme_plan, ensure_ascii=False) | |
| retry_note = ( | |
| f"\nThe previous completed Stage B response failed deterministic validation with reason={prior_reason}. " | |
| "Generate a fresh evidence object from the same frozen facts and original inputs; do not repair or continue the previous response." | |
| if prior_reason | |
| else "" | |
| ) | |
| if raw_interviews and len(raw_interviews) > 100: | |
| evidence_rules = f"""Use ONLY the supplied qualitative material. Return 8-12 representative quotations VERBATIM; never repair, paraphrase, translate, combine, or invent a quotation. Use at least three themes from the frozen theme plan when supported. Preserve stage/case labels only when supported by the material. | |
| <QUALITATIVE_MATERIAL> | |
| {raw_interviews[:30000]} | |
| </QUALITATIVE_MATERIAL>""" | |
| else: | |
| evidence_rules = """Generate exactly 12 concise natural representative quotations distributed across at least three themes from the frozen theme plan. Quotations must sound like distinct participants, each should be one concise complete sentence, and at least one evidence item must be clearly labelled deviant. Do not change or contradict any frozen study fact.""" | |
| return f"""Topic: {topic} | |
| Keywords: {keywords} | |
| <USER_RESEARCH_INTENT>{intent_block}</USER_RESEARCH_INTENT> | |
| This is FALLBACK STAGE B. The study facts below are frozen authority and MUST NOT be changed. | |
| <FROZEN_STUDY_FACTS>{facts_block}</FROZEN_STUDY_FACTS> | |
| <FROZEN_THEME_PLAN>{themes_block}</FROZEN_THEME_PLAN> | |
| {evidence_rules} | |
| {retry_note} | |
| Return ONLY one valid JSON object with this schema: | |
| {{ | |
| "evidence": [ | |
| {{ | |
| "theme": "one frozen theme", | |
| "concept": "concise empirical concept", | |
| "quote": "representative quotation", | |
| "stage": "temporal/process stage or Not specified", | |
| "case_label": "generic case/actor label or Not specified", | |
| "evidence_role": "typical or deviant" | |
| }} | |
| ] | |
| }} | |
| No Markdown and no explanatory prose. | |
| """ | |
| def _generate_staged_qualitative_packet( | |
| self, | |
| topic, | |
| keywords, | |
| raw_interviews, | |
| *, | |
| has_user_data, | |
| user_intent, | |
| trigger_reason, | |
| ): | |
| """Bounded small-JSON fallback after a completed unsafe full packet.""" | |
| system_prompt = ( | |
| "You are a rigorous qualitative research analyst. " | |
| "Evidence fidelity has priority over narrative completeness." | |
| ) | |
| facts_data = None | |
| facts = None | |
| theme_plan = None | |
| facts_reason = "packet_not_json_object" | |
| facts_prompt = self._build_study_facts_stage_request( | |
| topic, keywords, raw_interviews, user_intent | |
| ) | |
| for attempt in range(2): | |
| prompt = facts_prompt | |
| if attempt: | |
| prompt += ( | |
| "\n\nLOCAL STAGE-A RETRY: The previous completed response failed deterministic " | |
| f"validation with reason={facts_reason}. Generate a fresh complete Stage A JSON object " | |
| "from the ORIGINAL inputs. Do not repair or continue the previous response." | |
| ) | |
| facts_data = self._call_qualitative_json( | |
| system_prompt, | |
| prompt, | |
| max_tokens=2600, | |
| ) | |
| if not isinstance(facts_data, dict): | |
| facts_reason = "packet_not_json_object" | |
| continue | |
| facts = facts_data.get("study_facts") | |
| theme_plan = facts_data.get("theme_plan") | |
| facts_reason = self._study_facts_validation_error( | |
| facts, | |
| has_user_data=has_user_data, | |
| user_intent=user_intent, | |
| ) or self._theme_plan_validation_error(theme_plan) | |
| if not facts_reason: | |
| break | |
| logging.warning( | |
| "Qualitative staged fallback facts retry | attempt=%s/2 | trigger=%s | reason=%s", | |
| attempt + 1, | |
| trigger_reason, | |
| facts_reason, | |
| ) | |
| if facts_reason: | |
| raise RuntimeError( | |
| "Qualitative evidence facts fallback failed deterministic validation: " | |
| f"{facts_reason}." | |
| ) | |
| evidence_reason = "packet_not_json_object" | |
| for attempt in range(2): | |
| evidence_prompt = self._build_evidence_stage_request( | |
| topic, | |
| keywords, | |
| raw_interviews, | |
| user_intent, | |
| facts=facts, | |
| theme_plan=theme_plan, | |
| prior_reason=evidence_reason if attempt else "", | |
| ) | |
| evidence_data = self._call_qualitative_json( | |
| system_prompt, | |
| evidence_prompt, | |
| max_tokens=4600, | |
| ) | |
| evidence = evidence_data.get("evidence") if isinstance(evidence_data, dict) else None | |
| merged = {"study_facts": facts, "evidence": evidence} | |
| evidence_reason = self._qualitative_packet_validation_error( | |
| merged, | |
| has_user_data=has_user_data, | |
| user_intent=user_intent, | |
| ) | |
| if not evidence_reason: | |
| return merged | |
| logging.warning( | |
| "Qualitative staged fallback evidence retry | attempt=%s/2 | trigger=%s | reason=%s", | |
| attempt + 1, | |
| trigger_reason, | |
| evidence_reason, | |
| ) | |
| raise RuntimeError( | |
| "Qualitative evidence fallback failed deterministic validation after bounded regeneration: " | |
| f"{evidence_reason}." | |
| ) | |
| def _generate_qualitative_packet(self, topic, keywords, raw_interviews, *, has_user_data): | |
| """Generate one compact packet, then fall back to bounded smaller JSON stages.""" | |
| system_prompt = ( | |
| "You are a rigorous qualitative research analyst. " | |
| "Evidence fidelity has priority over narrative completeness." | |
| ) | |
| user_intent = build_user_research_intent(topic, keywords, mode="qualitative") | |
| base_prompt = self._build_request(topic, keywords, raw_interviews) | |
| data = self._call_qualitative_json( | |
| system_prompt + "\n\nDIRECT OUTPUT MODE: Produce the complete compact evidence packet directly without extended hidden reasoning.", | |
| base_prompt, | |
| max_tokens=8000, | |
| ) | |
| reason = self._qualitative_packet_validation_error( | |
| data, | |
| has_user_data=has_user_data, | |
| user_intent=user_intent, | |
| ) | |
| if not reason: | |
| return data | |
| logging.warning( | |
| "Qualitative evidence full packet unsafe; entering staged fallback | reason=%s", | |
| reason, | |
| ) | |
| return self._generate_staged_qualitative_packet( | |
| topic, | |
| keywords, | |
| raw_interviews, | |
| has_user_data=has_user_data, | |
| user_intent=user_intent, | |
| trigger_reason=reason, | |
| ) | |
| def resolve_qualitative_data(self, topic, keywords, raw_interviews=""): | |
| has_user_data = bool(raw_interviews and len(raw_interviews) > 100) | |
| # R3-Free engine code is headless. Streamlit rendering belongs to app.py; | |
| # this method only produces frozen evidence + metadata. | |
| data = self._generate_qualitative_packet( | |
| topic, keywords, raw_interviews, has_user_data=has_user_data | |
| ) | |
| facts = data.get("study_facts") or {} | |
| evidence = data.get("evidence") or data.get("quotes") or [] | |
| data_sources = facts.get("data_sources") or ["Not specified"] | |
| if not isinstance(data_sources, list): | |
| data_sources = [data_sources] | |
| setting = self._clean_cell(facts.get("research_setting")) | |
| clean_sources = [self._clean_cell(item) for item in data_sources] | |
| sources = ", ".join(clean_sources) | |
| data_source_roles = self._normalize_data_source_roles(facts.get("data_source_roles") or []) | |
| trustworthiness = self._normalize_string_list(facts.get("trustworthiness_procedures")) | |
| ethics = self._normalize_string_list(facts.get("ethics_procedures")) | |
| reflexivity = self._normalize_string_list(facts.get("reflexivity_procedures")) | |
| participants = facts.get("participant_count") | |
| interviews = facts.get("interview_count") | |
| analytic_design = self._normalize_analytic_design( | |
| facts.get("analytic_design") or facts.get("analysis_method") | |
| ) | |
| analytic_logic = self._clean_cell( | |
| facts.get("analytic_logic"), | |
| "Iteratively compare empirical observations to refine a process/mechanism explanation.", | |
| ) | |
| temporal_structure = self._clean_cell(facts.get("temporal_structure")) | |
| case_structure = self._clean_cell(facts.get("case_structure")) | |
| for value, label in ((participants, "participant_count"), (interviews, "interview_count")): | |
| if value is not None and (not isinstance(value, int) or value <= 0): | |
| raise RuntimeError(f"Qualitative evidence packet has invalid {label}.") | |
| md = ( | |
| "### Frozen Qualitative Study Design\n" | |
| "| Field | Frozen value |\n" | |
| "| :--- | :--- |\n" | |
| f"| Research setting | {setting} |\n" | |
| f"| Data sources | {sources} |\n" | |
| f"| Participants | {participants if participants is not None else 'Not specified'} |\n" | |
| f"| Interviews | {interviews if interviews is not None else 'Not specified'} |\n" | |
| f"| Analytic design | {analytic_design} |\n" | |
| f"| Analytic logic | {analytic_logic} |\n" | |
| f"| Temporal structure | {temporal_structure} |\n" | |
| f"| Case structure | {case_structure} |\n" | |
| f"| Trustworthiness procedures | {'; '.join(trustworthiness) if trustworthiness else 'Not specified'} |\n" | |
| f"| Ethics procedures | {'; '.join(ethics) if ethics else 'Not specified'} |\n" | |
| f"| Reflexivity procedures | {'; '.join(reflexivity) if reflexivity else 'Not specified'} |\n\n" | |
| "[QUALITATIVE EVIDENCE CONTRACT]\n" | |
| "Use the frozen design summary and tagged evidence below as the only source of this study's empirical facts. " | |
| "Do not change the setting, sample, interview count, data sources, actor/data-source relations, analytic design, temporal structure, cases, procedures, or quotations. " | |
| "Do not infer an event sequence, actor comparison, trustworthiness/ethics/reflexivity procedure, negative case, or quotation that is absent from this packet.\n\n" | |
| "### Table: Qualitative Evidence Structure\n" | |
| "| Higher-order Theme | Empirical Concept | Process Stage | Case/Actor | Evidence Role | Representative Quote |\n" | |
| "| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |\n" | |
| ) | |
| if data_source_roles: | |
| md += ( | |
| "### Frozen Actor / Data-Source Relations\n" | |
| "| Actor role | Data source | Count |\n" | |
| "| :--- | :--- | :--- |\n" | |
| ) | |
| for row in data_source_roles: | |
| md += f"| {row['actor_role']} | {row['data_source']} | {row['count'] if row['count'] is not None else 'Not specified'} |\n" | |
| md += "\n" | |
| clean_evidence = [] | |
| seen_quotes = set() | |
| for item in evidence[:15]: | |
| if not isinstance(item, dict): | |
| continue | |
| quote = self._clean_cell(item.get("quote"), "").replace('"', "'") | |
| concept = self._clean_cell(item.get("concept"), "Empirical observation") | |
| theme = self._clean_cell(item.get("theme"), "Emergent pattern") | |
| stage = self._clean_cell(item.get("stage")) | |
| case_label = self._clean_cell(item.get("case_label")) | |
| evidence_role = str(item.get("evidence_role") or "typical").strip().lower() | |
| if evidence_role not in {"typical", "deviant"}: | |
| evidence_role = "typical" | |
| normalized_quote = re.sub(r"\s+", " ", quote).strip().lower() | |
| if not self._quote_has_substantive_content(quote) or normalized_quote in seen_quotes: | |
| continue | |
| seen_quotes.add(normalized_quote) | |
| tag = f"QUOTE-{len(clean_evidence) + 1:02d}" | |
| md += ( | |
| f'| {theme} | {concept} | {stage} | {case_label} | {evidence_role} | ' | |
| f'"{quote}" [{tag}] |\n' | |
| ) | |
| clean_evidence.append( | |
| { | |
| "theme": theme, | |
| "concept": concept, | |
| "quote": quote, | |
| "quote_hash": hashlib.sha256(re.sub(r"\s+", " ", quote).strip().encode("utf-8")).hexdigest(), | |
| "tag": tag, | |
| "stage": stage, | |
| "case_label": case_label, | |
| "evidence_role": evidence_role, | |
| } | |
| ) | |
| theme_map = {} | |
| theme_ids = {} | |
| for item in clean_evidence: | |
| theme_key = re.sub(r"\s+", " ", item["theme"]).strip().casefold() | |
| theme_id = theme_ids.setdefault(theme_key, f"THEME-{len(theme_ids) + 1:02d}") | |
| item["theme_id"] = theme_id | |
| theme_entry = theme_map.setdefault( | |
| item["theme"], | |
| { | |
| "theme_id": theme_id, | |
| "title": item["theme"], | |
| "concepts": [], | |
| "evidence": [], | |
| "stages": [], | |
| "has_deviant_evidence": False, | |
| }, | |
| ) | |
| if item["concept"] not in theme_entry["concepts"]: | |
| theme_entry["concepts"].append(item["concept"]) | |
| if item["stage"] != "Not specified" and item["stage"] not in theme_entry["stages"]: | |
| theme_entry["stages"].append(item["stage"]) | |
| if item["evidence_role"] == "deviant": | |
| theme_entry["has_deviant_evidence"] = True | |
| theme_entry["evidence"].append( | |
| { | |
| "theme_id": item["theme_id"], | |
| "tag": item["tag"], | |
| "quote": item["quote"], | |
| "quote_hash": item["quote_hash"], | |
| "stage": item["stage"], | |
| "case_label": item["case_label"], | |
| "evidence_role": item["evidence_role"], | |
| } | |
| ) | |
| themes = list(theme_map.values()) | |
| validation = APP_CONFIG.get("manuscript_validation", {}) | |
| minimum_themes = int(validation.get("minimum_qualitative_themes", 3)) | |
| minimum_quotes = int(validation.get("minimum_qualitative_quotes", 8)) | |
| if len(themes) < minimum_themes or len(clean_evidence) < minimum_quotes: | |
| raise RuntimeError( | |
| "Qualitative evidence packet is incomplete: " | |
| f"themes={len(themes)}, quotes={len(clean_evidence)}; " | |
| f"required themes>={minimum_themes}, quotes>={minimum_quotes}." | |
| ) | |
| if not has_user_data and not any(item["evidence_role"] == "deviant" for item in clean_evidence): | |
| raise RuntimeError("Generated qualitative evidence packet lacks a deviant/boundary observation.") | |
| metadata = { | |
| "mode": "qualitative", | |
| "source_type": ( | |
| "user_provided" if has_user_data else "system_generated" | |
| ), | |
| "disclosure_required": not has_user_data, | |
| "study_facts": { | |
| "research_setting": setting, | |
| "data_sources": clean_sources, | |
| "data_source_roles": data_source_roles, | |
| "participant_count": participants, | |
| "interview_count": interviews, | |
| "trustworthiness_procedures": trustworthiness, | |
| "ethics_procedures": ethics, | |
| "reflexivity_procedures": reflexivity, | |
| "analytic_design": analytic_design, | |
| "analysis_method": analytic_design, | |
| "analytic_logic": analytic_logic, | |
| "temporal_structure": temporal_structure, | |
| "case_structure": case_structure, | |
| }, | |
| "evidence_count": len(clean_evidence), | |
| "generation_parameters": { | |
| "analytic_design": analytic_design, | |
| "requested_quote_count_when_generated": 12, | |
| "maximum_retained_quotes": 15, | |
| "minimum_themes": minimum_themes, | |
| "minimum_quotes": minimum_quotes, | |
| "requires_generated_deviant_evidence": not has_user_data, | |
| "consistency_constraints": [ | |
| "one frozen research setting", | |
| "one frozen participant count", | |
| "one frozen interview count", | |
| "one frozen data-source set", | |
| "one frozen analytic design", | |
| "no unsupported temporal or case structure", | |
| "quotation tags must remain unique", | |
| ], | |
| }, | |
| "evidence": clean_evidence, | |
| "themes": themes, | |
| "user_research_intent": build_user_research_intent(topic, keywords, mode="qualitative"), | |
| } | |
| metadata["study_design_contract"] = build_qualitative_contract(topic, keywords, metadata) | |
| metadata["semantic_claim_frame"] = self.build_qualitative_semantic_claim_frame(metadata) | |
| status_message = "✅ 定性研究事实、分析设计与证据结构已冻结。" | |
| return md, status_message, metadata | |
| def get_qualitative_engine(agent): | |
| return QualitativeEngine(agent) | |