Spaces:
Paused
Paused
File size: 15,360 Bytes
e1c927b | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 | """Per-violation causal-layer attribution.
THE invariant of this module: a downstream failure NEVER auto-implies an
upstream cause. Every causal layer gets an INDEPENDENT evidence test that
returns SUPPORTED, RULED_OUT, or UNKNOWN; a layer is implicated only by its
own positive evidence, never by another layer's silence. Missing evidence
is UNKNOWN — an honest triage outcome, not a defect.
The planning test is the keystone of perception/planning separation: the
plan is re-judged by the SAME rule engine, but against the stack's OWN
world view (mapped context, detections it actually made, intents it
actually predicted, in its believed localization frame). A compliant plan
rules planning out; a non-compliant plan given the stack's own information
implicates planning regardless of what perception did.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from typing import Dict, List, Optional
from sensorflow.rotr import SOFTWARE_VERSION
from sensorflow.rotr.models import (
CAUSAL_LAYERS, Actor, FailureAttribution, LayerEvidence, Provenance,
ROTRScenario, ROTRViolation,
)
from sensorflow.rotr.rules import plan_violations
ATTRIBUTION_VERSION = "rotr-attr-1.0.0"
# ILLUSTRATIVE evidence thresholds (synthetic substrate).
DETECTION_RATE_RULED_OUT = 0.8
DETECTION_RATE_SUPPORTED = 0.5
POSITION_ERROR_SUPPORTED_M = 1.0
LOCALIZATION_ERROR_SUPPORTED_M = 1.0
CONTROL_POS_DEV_SUPPORTED_M = 1.5
CONTROL_SPEED_DEV_SUPPORTED_MPS = 2.0
def _material_actors(scenario: ROTRScenario,
violation: ROTRViolation) -> List[Actor]:
ids = set(violation.actor_ids)
return [a for a in scenario.actors if a.actor_id in ids]
# ------------------------------------------------------------ layer tests
def _test_perception(scenario: ROTRScenario,
violation: ROTRViolation) -> LayerEvidence:
actors = _material_actors(scenario, violation)
if not actors:
return LayerEvidence(
layer="perception", status="RULED_OUT", confidence=0.7,
evidence="rule trigger is ego/map-geometric; no actor whose "
"perception could have caused it")
# Judge detection quality in the window that mattered: from the actor
# becoming relevant (within 60 m) up to the violation instant.
worst: Optional[LayerEvidence] = None
for actor in actors:
n_frames = n_detected = n_absent = 0
pos_err_sum = 0.0
for i, s in enumerate(actor.states):
e = scenario.ego[min(i, len(scenario.ego) - 1)]
if s.t > violation.t_end + 0.5:
break
if abs(s.x - e.x) > 60 or abs(s.y - e.y) > 30:
continue
n_frames += 1
if s.observation is None:
n_absent += 1
elif s.observation.detected:
n_detected += 1
if s.observation.x is not None:
pos_err_sum += abs(s.observation.x - s.x) + \
abs((s.observation.y or s.y) - s.y)
if n_frames == 0:
continue
if n_absent / n_frames > 0.5:
cand = LayerEvidence(
layer="perception", status="UNKNOWN", confidence=0.0,
evidence=f"{actor.actor_id}: perception telemetry missing for "
f"{n_absent}/{n_frames} relevant frames")
else:
assessable = n_frames - n_absent
rate = n_detected / assessable if assessable else 0.0
mean_err = pos_err_sum / n_detected if n_detected else 0.0
if rate < DETECTION_RATE_SUPPORTED:
cand = LayerEvidence(
layer="perception", status="SUPPORTED", confidence=0.9,
evidence=f"{actor.actor_id}: missed detection — GT visible "
f"{assessable} frames, detected {n_detected} "
f"(rate {rate:.2f})")
elif mean_err > POSITION_ERROR_SUPPORTED_M:
cand = LayerEvidence(
layer="perception", status="SUPPORTED", confidence=0.75,
evidence=f"{actor.actor_id}: detected but mislocalized "
f"(mean |err| {mean_err:.2f} m)")
elif rate >= DETECTION_RATE_RULED_OUT:
cand = LayerEvidence(
layer="perception", status="RULED_OUT", confidence=0.9,
evidence=f"{actor.actor_id}: detected {n_detected}/"
f"{assessable} relevant frames (rate {rate:.2f}, "
f"mean |err| {mean_err:.2f} m) — GT-vs-detected "
f"diff is clean")
else:
cand = LayerEvidence(
layer="perception", status="SUPPORTED", confidence=0.6,
evidence=f"{actor.actor_id}: degraded detection "
f"(rate {rate:.2f})")
worst = _worse(worst, cand)
return worst or LayerEvidence(layer="perception", status="UNKNOWN",
evidence="no relevant frames to assess")
def _worse(a: Optional[LayerEvidence], b: LayerEvidence) -> LayerEvidence:
"""Prefer SUPPORTED > UNKNOWN > RULED_OUT when merging actor evidence."""
if a is None:
return b
order = {"SUPPORTED": 2, "UNKNOWN": 1, "RULED_OUT": 0}
if order[b.status] > order[a.status]:
return b
if order[b.status] == order[a.status] and b.confidence > a.confidence:
return b
return a
def _test_prediction(scenario: ROTRScenario,
violation: ROTRViolation) -> LayerEvidence:
actors = _material_actors(scenario, violation)
if not actors:
return LayerEvidence(layer="prediction", status="RULED_OUT",
confidence=0.7,
evidence="no actor whose intent needed predicting")
worst: Optional[LayerEvidence] = None
for actor in actors:
if actor.predicted_intent is None:
cand = LayerEvidence(layer="prediction", status="UNKNOWN",
evidence=f"{actor.actor_id}: no recorded "
"intent prediction")
elif actor.predicted_intent != actor.intent:
cand = LayerEvidence(
layer="prediction", status="SUPPORTED", confidence=0.85,
evidence=f"{actor.actor_id}: GT intent {actor.intent} but "
f"stack predicted {actor.predicted_intent}")
else:
cand = LayerEvidence(
layer="prediction", status="RULED_OUT", confidence=0.85,
evidence=f"{actor.actor_id}: predicted intent matches GT "
f"({actor.intent})")
worst = _worse(worst, cand)
return worst
def _test_planning(scenario: ROTRScenario,
violation: ROTRViolation) -> LayerEvidence:
if not scenario.planned:
return LayerEvidence(layer="planning", status="UNKNOWN",
evidence="no planned trajectory recorded")
hits = plan_violations(scenario)
same_rule = [h for h in hits if h["rule_id"] == violation.rule_id]
if same_rule:
return LayerEvidence(
layer="planning", status="SUPPORTED", confidence=0.85,
evidence=f"plan violates {violation.rule_id} given the stack's "
f"OWN world view (detections + predicted intents + "
f"believed frame): {same_rule[0]['evidence']}")
if hits:
return LayerEvidence(
layer="planning", status="SUPPORTED", confidence=0.6,
evidence="plan violates a different rule given the stack's own "
f"view: {hits[0]['rule_id']}")
return LayerEvidence(
layer="planning", status="RULED_OUT", confidence=0.85,
evidence="plan is rule-compliant given the stack's own world view — "
"the plan was reasonable for what the stack knew")
def _test_localization(scenario: ROTRScenario,
violation: ROTRViolation) -> LayerEvidence:
errs = []
for e in scenario.ego:
if e.believed_x is None or e.believed_y is None:
return LayerEvidence(layer="localization", status="UNKNOWN",
evidence="no believed-pose telemetry")
errs.append(abs(e.believed_x - e.x) + abs(e.believed_y - e.y))
max_err = max(errs) if errs else 0.0
lane_mismatch = any(e.believed_lane_id != e.lane_id for e in scenario.ego
if e.lane_id and e.believed_lane_id)
if max_err > LOCALIZATION_ERROR_SUPPORTED_M or lane_mismatch:
return LayerEvidence(
layer="localization", status="SUPPORTED", confidence=0.9,
evidence=f"believed-vs-true pose error up to {max_err:.2f} m"
+ ("; believed lane differs from true lane"
if lane_mismatch else ""))
return LayerEvidence(layer="localization", status="RULED_OUT",
confidence=0.9,
evidence=f"pose error <= {max_err:.2f} m; lane "
"association consistent")
def _test_map(scenario: ROTRScenario,
violation: ROTRViolation) -> LayerEvidence:
m, a = scenario.map_context, scenario.actual_context
diffs = []
if m.control != a.control:
diffs.append(f"control mapped={m.control!r} actual={a.control!r}")
if m.signal_state_for_ego != a.signal_state_for_ego:
diffs.append(f"signal mapped={m.signal_state_for_ego!r} "
f"actual={a.signal_state_for_ego!r}")
a_lanes = {l.lane_id: l for l in a.lanes}
for lane in m.lanes:
al = a_lanes.get(lane.lane_id)
if al is None:
diffs.append(f"lane {lane.lane_id} not in actual geometry")
continue
if lane.restricted_to != al.restricted_to:
diffs.append(f"lane {lane.lane_id} restriction mapped="
f"{lane.restricted_to!r} actual={al.restricted_to!r}")
if set(lane.permitted_maneuvers) != set(al.permitted_maneuvers):
diffs.append(f"lane {lane.lane_id} permitted maneuvers differ")
if diffs:
return LayerEvidence(layer="map", status="SUPPORTED", confidence=0.9,
evidence="map-vs-actual mismatch: " + "; ".join(diffs))
return LayerEvidence(layer="map", status="RULED_OUT", confidence=0.9,
evidence="mapped context matches as-built geometry")
def _test_control(scenario: ROTRScenario,
violation: ROTRViolation) -> LayerEvidence:
if not scenario.planned:
return LayerEvidence(layer="control", status="UNKNOWN",
evidence="no planned trajectory to compare "
"execution against")
n = min(len(scenario.planned), len(scenario.ego))
max_pos = max_spd = 0.0
for k in range(n):
p, e = scenario.planned[k], scenario.ego[k]
max_pos = max(max_pos, abs(p.x - e.x) + abs(p.y - e.y))
max_spd = max(max_spd, abs(p.v - e.speed))
if max_pos > CONTROL_POS_DEV_SUPPORTED_M or \
max_spd > CONTROL_SPEED_DEV_SUPPORTED_MPS:
return LayerEvidence(
layer="control", status="SUPPORTED", confidence=0.85,
evidence=f"executed trajectory deviates from plan: max position "
f"dev {max_pos:.2f} m, max speed dev {max_spd:.2f} m/s")
return LayerEvidence(
layer="control", status="RULED_OUT", confidence=0.85,
evidence=f"execution tracks the plan (max pos dev {max_pos:.2f} m, "
f"max speed dev {max_spd:.2f} m/s)")
def _test_data_label(scenario: ROTRScenario,
violation: ROTRViolation) -> LayerEvidence:
problems = []
ts = [e.t for e in scenario.ego]
if any(t2 <= t1 for t1, t2 in zip(ts, ts[1:])):
problems.append("ego timestamps not strictly increasing")
for a in scenario.actors:
if len(a.states) != len(scenario.ego):
problems.append(f"{a.actor_id}: state array length mismatch")
if problems:
return LayerEvidence(layer="data_label", status="SUPPORTED",
confidence=0.95,
evidence="record integrity failed: "
+ "; ".join(problems))
return LayerEvidence(layer="data_label", status="RULED_OUT",
confidence=0.9,
evidence="record integrity checks pass "
"(monotone timestamps, consistent arrays)")
def _test_policy_rule(others: Dict[str, LayerEvidence]) -> LayerEvidence:
statuses = {le.status for le in others.values()}
if statuses == {"RULED_OUT"}:
return LayerEvidence(
layer="policy_rule", status="SUPPORTED", confidence=0.4,
evidence="every stack layer independently RULED_OUT — the rule "
"itself needs HITL review (possible rule misfire)")
if "SUPPORTED" in statuses:
return LayerEvidence(layer="policy_rule", status="RULED_OUT",
confidence=0.7,
evidence="a stack layer has positive evidence; "
"no indication the rule misfired")
return LayerEvidence(layer="policy_rule", status="UNKNOWN",
evidence="stack evidence incomplete; rule quality "
"cannot be judged")
# ------------------------------------------------------------ entry point
def attribute(scenario: ROTRScenario,
violation: ROTRViolation) -> FailureAttribution:
layers: Dict[str, LayerEvidence] = {
"perception": _test_perception(scenario, violation),
"prediction": _test_prediction(scenario, violation),
"planning": _test_planning(scenario, violation),
"localization": _test_localization(scenario, violation),
"map": _test_map(scenario, violation),
"control": _test_control(scenario, violation),
"data_label": _test_data_label(scenario, violation),
}
layers["policy_rule"] = _test_policy_rule(layers)
supported = [(name, le) for name, le in layers.items()
if le.status == "SUPPORTED"]
primary = None
if supported:
supported.sort(key=lambda kv: (-kv[1].confidence,
CAUSAL_LAYERS.index(kv[0])))
primary = supported[0][0]
note = ("no layer has positive evidence — triaged to HITL, NOT "
"defaulted to perception" if primary is None else
f"primary={primary} by highest-confidence positive evidence; "
f"{len(supported)} layer(s) SUPPORTED")
return FailureAttribution(
violation_id=violation.violation_id,
scenario_id=scenario.scenario_id,
layers=layers, primary_layer=primary, note=note,
provenance=Provenance(
scenario_id=scenario.scenario_id,
dataset_version=scenario.provenance.dataset_version,
model_version=scenario.provenance.model_version,
software_version=f"{SOFTWARE_VERSION}/{ATTRIBUTION_VERSION}",
source=scenario.provenance.source))
|