Download benchmarks.json from world-models/world-model-benchmark: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 4.21 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/spaces/world-models/world-model-benchmark/resolve/main/benchmarks.json
- Command line
-
hf download hf://spaces/world-models/world-model-benchmark/benchmarks.json
-
curl -L -o benchmarks.json https://huggingface.co/spaces/world-models/world-model-benchmark/resolve/main/benchmarks.json
4.21 kB
| [ | |
| { | |
| "family": "Latent Dynamics", | |
| "capability": "State prediction", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Latent prediction error", | |
| "Reconstruction quality", | |
| "Rollout stability" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "Compact predictive models and model-based RL", | |
| "questions": "Does the latent state preserve information needed for future prediction?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "family": "Visual Prediction", | |
| "capability": "Future observation prediction", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Perceptual similarity", | |
| "Temporal consistency", | |
| "Object persistence" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "Video and image-based world models", | |
| "questions": "Are generated future observations coherent and useful?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "family": "Interactive Environments", | |
| "capability": "Action-conditioned simulation", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Action fidelity", | |
| "Controllability", | |
| "State consistency" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "Interactive generative environments", | |
| "questions": "Do control inputs produce stable and meaningful changes?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "family": "Model-Based Reinforcement Learning", | |
| "capability": "Planning utility", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Return", | |
| "Sample efficiency", | |
| "Planning success", | |
| "Model error" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "Agents learning through imagined trajectories", | |
| "questions": "Does the learned world model improve decisions and reduce environment interaction?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "family": "Robotics & Manipulation", | |
| "capability": "Physical interaction", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Task success", | |
| "Trajectory error", | |
| "Action success", | |
| "Safety violations" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "Robot control and manipulation", | |
| "questions": "Can the model predict and support physically grounded actions?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "family": "Embodied Navigation", | |
| "capability": "Spatial planning", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Navigation success", | |
| "Path efficiency", | |
| "Localization error", | |
| "Goal completion" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "Embodied agents and mobile robots", | |
| "questions": "Does the model preserve useful spatial structure over time?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "family": "Autonomous Systems", | |
| "capability": "Trajectory forecasting", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Trajectory error", | |
| "Collision rate", | |
| "Calibration", | |
| "Scenario coverage" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "Driving, drones and autonomous machines", | |
| "questions": "Can the system model multiple actors and plausible future trajectories?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "family": "Physical Reasoning", | |
| "capability": "Physics consistency", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Constraint violations", | |
| "Interaction accuracy", | |
| "State transition validity" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "Physical AI and simulation", | |
| "questions": "Do generated dynamics respect useful physical regularities?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "family": "Spatial Intelligence", | |
| "capability": "3D and relational consistency", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Pose error", | |
| "Depth consistency", | |
| "Object relation accuracy", | |
| "Map consistency" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "3D, scene understanding and spatial AI", | |
| "questions": "Does the model maintain geometry and object relationships?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "family": "Agent Planning", | |
| "capability": "Long-horizon decision support", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Goal success", | |
| "Plan validity", | |
| "Recovery rate", | |
| "Action efficiency" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "Digital and embodied agents", | |
| "questions": "Can the model support useful multi-step plans under uncertainty?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "family": "Long-Horizon Simulation", | |
| "capability": "Rollout stability", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Drift", | |
| "Consistency decay", | |
| "Error accumulation", | |
| "State validity" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "Persistent simulations and long rollouts", | |
| "questions": "How quickly do errors compound as the imagined future gets longer?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "family": "Multimodal World Modeling", | |
| "capability": "Cross-modal state understanding", | |
| "metrics": [ | |
| "Cross-modal consistency", | |
| "Alignment", | |
| "Prediction quality", | |
| "Task utility" | |
| ], | |
| "best_for": "Vision-language-sensor world models", | |
| "questions": "Can multiple modalities contribute to one coherent world representation?" | |
| } | |
| ] |