BluScriptCP / logs /cont64k /eval_65512.log
unparallelled's picture
Upload folder using huggingface_hub
7b11354 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
1.82 kB
[18:22:46] longeval: T=65536 prompt_len=65512 max_new=24 n=100 greedy=1 gpus=3
[18:22:46] haystack: /root/Adhi/BluTrain/dist/Context_Parallelism/Data_Loader/Data/b2_8192_16384/val_shard_00000.bin
[18:22:46] prompt signature changed -- regenerating prompts and clearing state
[18:22:46] generating prompts: niah_single
[18:22:51] fan-out: 1 GPU(s), NP=1 -> 1 concurrent job(s)
[18:22:51] 1 job(s) to run
[18:22:51] [gpu 3] cont64k / niah_single
[19:07:25] scoring cont64k / niah_single
=== niah_single (prompt_len=65512, n=100) ===
accuracy: 1/100 = 1.0%
depth acc (needle position in context)
0.00 0/20 0.0%
0.25 0/20 0.0%
0.50 0/20 0.0%
0.75 0/20 0.0%
1.00 1/20 5.0%
--- 2 sample generations ---
[MISS] expect=8056020
got= the number yof. Let’ credentials jacking wheel. IB Text Is to answer, as does
[MISS] expect=5343902
got= not just what the output. Why do it better Insaid had two options and just the questions of what happens, when
wrote cont64k_len_65512/scores/cont64k_niah_single.csv
[19:07:25] building summary
=== per-task accuracy % (secondary/descriptive: ~10 per depth cell) ===
task cont64k
niah_single 1.0
degenerate (<=1% for every model): ['niah_single']
ALL tasks degenerate -> FLOOR EFFECT. Pooling everything anyway;
differences between models are untestable at this setting (no power).
=== PRIMARY: accuracy % pooled by depth across tasks (+-95% Wilson) ===
depth cont64k
0.00 0.0+- 8.1
0.25 0.0+- 8.1
0.50 0.0+- 8.1
0.75 0.0+- 8.1
1.00 5.0+-11.4
wrote cont64k_len_65512/summary.csv and cont64k_len_65512/depth_summary.csv
[19:07:25] DONE -> cont64k_len_65512/summary.csv