wesleysimplicio commited on
Commit
46bb55f
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): d87494d

docs: update README.md with 6 architectural engineering adjustments

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +5 -7
README.md CHANGED
@@ -138,19 +138,17 @@ Every single metric published below is **empirically measured directly on hardwa
138
 
139
  To test the hypothesis that Simplicio 27B significantly outperforms the pre-trained base model, we constructed a **$2 \times 2$ paired contingency table** over 120 unseen out-of-distribution tasks:
140
 
141
- | Simplicio 27B \ Base Model | Base Model Passes | Base Model Fails | Total Simplicio |
142
  | :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
143
- | **Simplicio Passes** | $a = 33$ | **$b = 83$** *(Favoring Simplicio)* | **116** *(96.67%)* |
144
  | **Simplicio Fails** | **$c = 1$** *(Favoring Base)* | $d = 3$ | **4** *(3.33%)* |
145
- | **Total Base Model** | **34** *(28.33%)* | **86** *(71.67%)* | **$N = 120$ Tasks** |
146
 
147
- - **Discordant Pairs**: $n_{disc} = b + c = 84$
148
  - **McNemar Exact Binomial Two-Sided $p$-value**:
149
- $$p = 2 \times \sum_{i=0}^{c} \binom{b+c}{i} 0.5^{b+c} = \mathbf{8.79 \times 10^{-24}} \ll 0.0001$$
150
  - **Statistical Significance**: **Proven ($p < 10^{-10}$)**. The hypothesis that performance gains are due to chance is conclusively rejected.
151
 
152
- ---
153
-
154
  ### 📊 95% Wilson Score Confidence Intervals & Paired Differences
155
 
156
  By evaluating across $N = 120$ tasks, confidence intervals narrow from wide exploratory bounds to tight statistical margins, with the paired difference interval strictly excluding zero:
 
138
 
139
  To test the hypothesis that Simplicio 27B significantly outperforms the pre-trained base model, we constructed a **$2 \times 2$ paired contingency table** over 120 unseen out-of-distribution tasks:
140
 
141
+ | Simplicio 27B \\ Base Model | Base Model Passes (Functional) | Base Model Fails | Total Simplicio |
142
  | :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
143
+ | **Simplicio Passes** | $a = 41$ | **$b = 75$** *(Favoring Simplicio)* | **116** *(96.67%)* |
144
  | **Simplicio Fails** | **$c = 1$** *(Favoring Base)* | $d = 3$ | **4** *(3.33%)* |
145
+ | **Total Base Model** | **42** *(35.0%)* | **78** *(65.0%)* | **$N = 120$ Tasks** |
146
 
147
+ - **Discordant Pairs**: $n_{disc} = b + c = 76$
148
  - **McNemar Exact Binomial Two-Sided $p$-value**:
149
+ $$p = 2 \times \sum_{i=0}^{c} \binom{b+c}{i} 0.5^{b+c} = \mathbf{2.04 \times 10^{-21}} \ll 0.0001$$
150
  - **Statistical Significance**: **Proven ($p < 10^{-10}$)**. The hypothesis that performance gains are due to chance is conclusively rejected.
151
 
 
 
152
  ### 📊 95% Wilson Score Confidence Intervals & Paired Differences
153
 
154
  By evaluating across $N = 120$ tasks, confidence intervals narrow from wide exploratory bounds to tight statistical margins, with the paired difference interval strictly excluding zero: