File size: 6,691 Bytes
8985516
 
 
 
 
f4f2ba4
 
 
 
 
 
 
8985516
 
 
 
f4f2ba4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8985516
f4f2ba4
8985516
f4f2ba4
8985516
f4f2ba4
8985516
f4f2ba4
8985516
f4f2ba4
8985516
f4f2ba4
 
 
 
 
 
8985516
75c4407
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f4f2ba4
8985516
f4f2ba4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8985516
f4f2ba4
8985516
f4f2ba4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
---
license: apache-2.0
library_name: transformers
base_model: convaiinnovations/laya
tags:
  - laya
  - system-1
  - action-ranking
  - decision-model
  - enterprise-ai
  - research
  - experimental
---

# Enterprise Reflux Laya V2.1

> [!CAUTION]
> ## Research Prototype β€” DO NOT USE IN PRODUCTION
>
> **This model is an experimental research prototype and is not production-ready.**
>
> It MUST NOT be used as an authorization, policy, security, approval, or autonomous execution engine.
>
> Evaluation has identified **incorrect high-confidence decisions and unsafe System-1 routing cases**. A high confidence score or ACT probability must **not** be interpreted as permission to execute an action.
>
> Any real deployment would require external deterministic authorization, policy enforcement, precondition validation, risk controls, human approval, and additional safety evaluation.

## Overview

**Enterprise Reflux Laya V2.1** is an experimental System-1 decision model for ranking dynamically supplied enterprise actions.

Given a request, current state/context, and a set of candidate actions, the model attempts to select the most appropriate action or return `NO_ACTION`.

The project explores whether a relatively small specialized decision model can handle fast action selection while escalating uncertain or unsafe decisions to a larger System-2 model or human workflow.

V2.1 is based on **Laya (`convaiinnovations/laya`)** and adds targeted training for:

- Counterfactual state changes
- Hard `NO_ACTION` decisions
- Policy and precondition constraints
- Sibling-action discrimination
- Cross-domain collisions
- ACT / ESCALATE supervision


## Quick Start

Install Laya and load the fine-tuned model with the normal `laya.Agent` runtime.

```bash
pip install laya==0.3.20
```

```python
import laya

MODEL_ID = "yasserrmd/enterprise-reflux-laya-v21"

agent = laya.Agent(
    MODEL_ID,
    device="cuda",   # use "cpu" if CUDA is unavailable
)

state = {
    "request": "Release the approved supplier payment.",
    "domain": "Finance",
    "state": {
        "payment_approved": True,
        "fraud_clear": True,
    },
}

questions = {
    "action": {
        "type": "choice",
        "instructions": (
            "Select the single best action for the request and current state. "
            "Choose NO_ACTION when no candidate action is valid."
        ),
        "criteria": {
            "finance.release_payment": (
                "Release a supplier payment only after all required "
                "approvals and validations."
            ),
            "finance.hold_payment": (
                "Place the supplier payment on hold."
            ),
            "NO_ACTION": (
                "Take no action when the request is not currently eligible "
                "for any supplied action."
            ),
        },
    }
}

result = agent.predict(state, questions)
answer = result["answers"]["action"]

print("Decision:", answer["decision"])
print("Confidence:", answer["confidence"])
print("ACT probability:", answer["act_probability"])
print("Ranking:", answer["ranked"])
```

Candidate actions are supplied dynamically at inference time, so the action set can change from request to request.

> **Important:** `decision`, `confidence`, and `act_probability` are model outputs, not authorization signals. Do not execute a real operation solely because the model selected an action or returned a high ACT probability. Apply deterministic permissions, policy, preconditions, risk controls, and required approvals outside the model before any execution.

## Intended Architecture

```text
Request + State + Candidate Actions
                 β”‚
                 β–Ό
       Deterministic Controls
   Authorization / Policy / Risk
                 β”‚
                 β–Ό
       Enterprise Reflux Laya
                 β”‚
          Action Ranking
                 β”‚
          β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
          β”‚             β”‚
         ACT        ESCALATE
          β”‚             β”‚
          β–Ό             β–Ό
     Controlled      System-2 /
      Execution        Human
```

The neural model should therefore be treated as a **decision/ranking component**, not as the final authority to execute an operation.

## Evaluation

Three frozen benchmark suites were used without training or threshold tuning on those benchmark cases.

| Benchmark | Top-1 | Top-2 | Top-3 |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| Extreme-200 | **71.0%** | 84.5% | 92.0% |
| Hard-400 | **80.75%** | 93.0% | 96.75% |
| Mixed-500 | **79.0%** | 92.4% | 95.6% |

Compared with the previous Enterprise Reflux Laya checkpoint:

| Benchmark | Previous | V2.1 |
|---|---:|---:|
| Extreme-200 Top-1 | 54.0% | **71.0%** |
| Hard-400 Top-1 | 50.0% | **80.75%** |
| Mixed-500 Top-1 | 60.4% | **79.0%** |

These results indicate a substantial improvement in action ranking, particularly on policy, multi-constraint, and hard decision cases.

They **do not demonstrate production safety**.

## Known Limitations

The most important remaining weakness is autonomous execution routing.

Observed System-1 results include:

| Benchmark | Coverage | Accuracy | Unsafe Decisions |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| Extreme-200 | 20.0% | 77.5% | 9 |
| Hard-400 | 19.75% | 84.81% | 12 |
| Mixed-500 | 37.2% | 90.32% | 18 |

State-sensitive reasoning also remains significantly weaker than several other categories.

The model can additionally produce **high-confidence incorrect predictions**, meaning confidence alone is not a reliable execution-safety mechanism.

## Recommended Use

Appropriate uses include:

- Research
- Benchmarking
- Action-ranking experiments
- System-1 / System-2 architecture research
- Abstention and escalation research
- Decision-model experimentation

**Not appropriate for production autonomous execution.**

Any experiment involving real actions should place deterministic eligibility, permissions, policy, security, and approval controls outside the model.

## Status

**Research Prototype V2.1**

The ranking improvements are promising, but the current work should be considered an experimental checkpoint rather than a deployable enterprise model.

Current research focus:

**better state-sensitive discrimination and safer separation between action ranking and execution authority.**

## Base Model

Built on:

**Laya β€” `convaiinnovations/laya`**

Credit to the Laya authors for the underlying architecture and decision-model approach.

## Author

**Mohamed Yasser**

Research project exploring lightweight System-1 models, action ranking, decision routing, and specialized alternatives to using large language models for every enterprise decision.