Add official FP8 release to checkpoint list

#5
by Eang - opened
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +59 -71
README.md CHANGED
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ license: apache-2.0
3
  library_name: transformers
4
  pipeline_tag: image-text-to-text
5
  base_model: Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
 
 
6
  tags:
7
  - agent
8
  - agentic
@@ -15,11 +17,11 @@ tags:
15
 
16
  <div align="center">
17
  <picture>
18
- <img src="assets/accio.png" width="34%" alt="Accio">
19
  </picture>
20
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
21
  <picture>
22
- <img src="assets/occamy.png" width="13%" alt="Occamy logo">
23
  </picture>
24
  <h1>Occamy-1.0</h1>
25
  <p><strong>Open Pareto-frontier 35B Intelligence for Co-work</strong></p>
@@ -30,16 +32,21 @@ tags:
30
  <div align="center" style="line-height: 1;">
31
  <a href="https://accio-lab.github.io/occamy/"><img alt="Project Website" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Website-Occamy--1.0-087F6A"></a>
32
  <a href="https://huggingface.co/Accio-Lab/Occamy-1.0"><img alt="Hugging Face" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/%F0%9F%A4%97%20Model-Occamy--1.0-FFD21E"></a>
33
- <a href="https://github.com/Accio-Lab/Dressage"><img alt="Dressage" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Training-Dressage-087F6A"></a>
34
  <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.11977"><img alt="Technical Report" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/%F0%9F%93%84%20Report-Occamy--1.0-B31B1B"></a>
 
35
  <a href="LICENSE"><img alt="License" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/License-Apache%202.0-blue"></a>
36
  </div>
37
 
38
- <p align="center">
39
- <a href="https://accio-lab.github.io/occamy/">Project Website</a> &nbsp;|&nbsp;
40
- <a href="https://huggingface.co/Accio-Lab/Occamy-1.0">Model Weights</a> &nbsp;|&nbsp;
41
- <a href="https://github.com/Accio-Lab/Dressage">Training Framework</a>
42
- </p>
 
 
 
 
 
43
 
44
  ## 1. Model Introduction
45
 
@@ -82,75 +89,51 @@ Architecture fields follow the starting checkpoint's published model card. Occam
82
 
83
  <div align="center">
84
  <picture>
85
- <img src="assets/occamy-main-results.png" width="100%" alt="Occamy-1.0 results on co-work, tool-use, coding, and business benchmarks">
86
- </picture>
87
- </div>
88
-
89
- ### Full Evaluation
90
-
91
- <table>
92
- <thead>
93
- <tr>
94
- <th rowspan="2" align="left" bgcolor="#EAF6F3">Benchmark</th>
95
- <th colspan="6" align="center" bgcolor="#EAF6F3"><font color="#087F6A">35B-A3B Models</font></th>
96
- <th colspan="4" align="center" bgcolor="#EAF6F3"><font color="#087F6A">Large-scale Models</font></th>
97
- </tr>
98
- <tr>
99
- <th align="center" bgcolor="#087F6A"><font color="#FFFFFF">Occamy-1.0</font></th>
100
- <th align="center">Qwen3.6<br>35B-A3B</th>
101
- <th align="center">Agents-A1</th>
102
- <th align="center">Nex-N2-mini</th>
103
- <th align="center">BigBang-1.0</th>
104
- <th align="center">Ornith-1.5</th>
105
- <th align="center">GPT-5.6 Sol</th>
106
- <th align="center">Qwen3.8-Max</th>
107
- <th align="center">DeepSeek V4<br>Pro (0813)</th>
108
- <th align="center">GLM-5.2</th>
109
- </tr>
110
- </thead>
111
- <tbody>
112
- <tr><td colspan="11" bgcolor="#DDF1EC"><font color="#087F6A"><strong>Co-work</strong></font></td></tr>
113
- <tr><td>Claw-Eval (average)</td><td align="right"><strong>82.20</strong></td><td align="right">69.50</td><td align="right"><u>69.90</u></td><td align="right">66.60</td><td align="right">63.50</td><td align="right">64.40</td><td align="right"><u>81.80</u></td><td align="right"><strong>83.92</strong></td><td align="right">81.70</td><td align="right">81.60</td></tr>
114
- <tr><td>Claw-Eval (PassΒ³)</td><td align="right"><strong>71.40</strong></td><td align="right"><u>54.80</u></td><td align="right">41.70</td><td align="right">37.00</td><td align="right">40.20</td><td align="right">48.70</td><td align="right">68.90</td><td align="right"><u>73.68</u></td><td align="right"><strong>74.50</strong></td><td align="right">68.30</td></tr>
115
- <tr><td>WildClawBench</td><td align="right"><strong>49.16</strong></td><td align="right">40.40</td><td align="right">30.73</td><td align="right">30.31</td><td align="right">32.87</td><td align="right"><u>45.91</u></td><td align="right"><strong>67.20</strong></td><td align="right"><u>54.42</u></td><td align="right">37.30</td><td align="right">52.14</td></tr>
116
- <tr><td>CommerceAgentBench</td><td align="right"><u>37.38</u></td><td align="right">19.60</td><td align="right">9.30</td><td align="right">16.80</td><td align="right">30.80</td><td align="right"><strong>37.40</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>49.50</strong></td><td align="right"><u>46.30</u></td><td align="right">43.30</td><td align="right">39.30</td></tr>
117
- <tr><td>Business Arena</td><td align="right"><strong>$79,868</strong></td><td align="right">$44,751</td><td align="right">$33,626</td><td align="right">$13,325</td><td align="right">$56,477</td><td align="right"><u>$66,292</u></td><td align="right"><strong>$168,867</strong></td><td align="right"><u>$89,423</u></td><td align="right">$40,804</td><td align="right">$55,742</td></tr>
118
- <tr><td>GDPval<sup>†</sup></td><td align="right"><strong>1,128</strong></td><td align="right"><u>1,004</u></td><td align="right">869</td><td align="right">999</td><td align="right">951</td><td align="right">855</td><td align="right"><strong>1,741</strong></td><td align="right"><u>1,640</u></td><td align="right">1,500</td><td align="right">1,452</td></tr>
119
- <tr><td>OfficeQA Pro</td><td align="right"><u>48.10</u></td><td align="right">39.10</td><td align="right">23.30</td><td align="right">46.60</td><td align="right">43.60</td><td align="right"><strong>59.40</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>74.40</strong></td><td align="right"><u>69.20</u></td><td align="right">51.20</td><td align="right">66.20</td></tr>
120
- <tr><td>τ³-Bench (Banking)</td><td align="right"><strong>37.10</strong></td><td align="right">11.90</td><td align="right">7.20</td><td align="right"><u>25.80</u></td><td align="right">10.30</td><td align="right">21.70</td><td align="right"><u>46.90</u></td><td align="right"><strong>54.60</strong></td><td align="right">44.30</td><td align="right">37.10</td></tr>
121
- <tr><td colspan="11" bgcolor="#DDF1EC"><font color="#087F6A"><strong>Tool calling</strong></font></td></tr>
122
- <tr><td>AutomationBench (PassΒΉ)</td><td align="right"><strong>27.60</strong></td><td align="right">7.50</td><td align="right">2.20</td><td align="right">5.70</td><td align="right">14.80</td><td align="right"><u>18.50</u></td><td align="right"><strong>45.50</strong></td><td align="right"><u>43.50</u></td><td align="right">32.00</td><td align="right">28.00</td></tr>
123
- <tr><td>AutomationBench (partial)</td><td align="right"><strong>69.10</strong></td><td align="right">39.40</td><td align="right">14.70</td><td align="right">27.90</td><td align="right">47.40</td><td align="right"><u>58.00</u></td><td align="right"><strong>81.20</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>81.20</strong></td><td align="right">59.70</td><td align="right"><u>70.00</u></td></tr>
124
- <tr><td>BFCL v4</td><td align="right"><u>65.40</u></td><td align="right">63.19</td><td align="right">57.23</td><td align="right">62.81</td><td align="right">57.86</td><td align="right"><strong>68.51</strong></td><td align="right">64.33</td><td align="right"><strong>73.65</strong></td><td align="right">67.10</td><td align="right"><u>70.33</u></td></tr>
125
- <tr><td>VitaBench</td><td align="right"><u>41.75</u></td><td align="right">34.25</td><td align="right">37.00</td><td align="right">26.25</td><td align="right"><strong>46.00</strong></td><td align="right">40.25</td><td align="right">46.75</td><td align="right"><u>52.25</u></td><td align="right"><strong>53.50</strong></td><td align="right">43.75</td></tr>
126
- <tr><td colspan="11" bgcolor="#DDF1EC"><font color="#087F6A"><strong>Coding</strong></font></td></tr>
127
- <tr><td>Terminal-Bench 2.1</td><td align="right">59.00</td><td align="right">49.50</td><td align="right">41.60</td><td align="right"><u>60.70<sup>*</sup></u></td><td align="right">33.70</td><td align="right"><strong>67.80<sup>*</sup></strong></td><td align="right"><strong>88.80</strong></td><td align="right">81.30<sup>*</sup></td><td align="right"><u>87.90<sup>*</sup></u></td><td align="right">82.70</td></tr>
128
- <tr><td colspan="11" bgcolor="#DDF1EC"><font color="#087F6A"><strong>Instruction following</strong></font></td></tr>
129
- <tr><td>IFEval</td><td align="right"><u>91.53</u></td><td align="right">86.90</td><td align="right"><strong>91.60</strong></td><td align="right"><strong>91.60</strong></td><td align="right">90.50</td><td align="right">81.80</td><td align="right"><u>95.00</u></td><td align="right"><strong>95.02</strong></td><td align="right">93.74</td><td align="right">93.89</td></tr>
130
- </tbody>
131
- </table>
132
-
133
- Within each size group, **bold** denotes the best result and <u>underlining</u> denotes the second-best result. <sup>*</sup> Official model-card or Artificial Analysis result. <sup>†</sup> Reproduced on the public task release.
134
-
135
- ### Cost-Performance
136
-
137
- <div align="center">
138
- <picture>
139
- <img src="assets/aggregate-cost-performance.png" width="100%" alt="Aggregate inference cost versus normalized performance across four co-work benchmarks">
140
  </picture>
141
  </div>
142
 
143
- Across Claw-Eval, WildClawBench, AutomationBench, and GDPval, Occamy-1.0 lies near the low-cost knee of the empirical Pareto frontier. Relative to its Qwen3.6-35B-A3B starting checkpoint, it delivers a large aggregate capability gain with only a modest change in measured per-task inference cost. Benchmark scores are equally weighted after per-benchmark min-max normalization, and costs are macro-averaged per task under the frozen pricing protocol used in the report.
144
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
145
 
146
  ## 4. Training Recipe
147
 
148
- Occamy uses staged specialization and consolidation:
149
 
150
  ```text
151
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
152
- β”œβ”€ Marathon Expert: SFT β†’ HDPO ┐
153
- └─ Sprint Expert: SFT β”œβ”€ Uniform merge β†’ SAO β†’ Occamy-1.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
154
  ```
155
 
156
  The Marathon Expert learns sustained execution and accuracy-conditioned efficiency, while the Sprint Expert preserves broader agentic capability. A uniform parameter-space merge combines both experts into one checkpoint with no inference-time routing or ensembling, and a final Single-Rollout Asynchronous Optimization (SAO) stage refines the merged policy on a broad co-work mixture.
@@ -247,6 +230,11 @@ This repository is released under the [Apache License 2.0](LICENSE). See the Hug
247
 
248
  ---
249
 
250
- ## 8. Contact Us
 
 
 
 
 
251
 
252
- For questions or feedback, please open an [issue](https://github.com/Accio-Lab/occamy/issues).
 
3
  library_name: transformers
4
  pipeline_tag: image-text-to-text
5
  base_model: Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
6
+ datasets:
7
+ - Accio-Lab/occamy-data-1.0
8
  tags:
9
  - agent
10
  - agentic
 
17
 
18
  <div align="center">
19
  <picture>
20
+ <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Accio-Lab/occamy/9818009b54abbbc5f3c5620c93dfbf7e5b90dd06/assets/accio.svg" width="34%" alt="Accio">
21
  </picture>
22
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
23
  <picture>
24
+ <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Accio-Lab/occamy/9818009b54abbbc5f3c5620c93dfbf7e5b90dd06/assets/occamy.png" width="13%" alt="Occamy logo">
25
  </picture>
26
  <h1>Occamy-1.0</h1>
27
  <p><strong>Open Pareto-frontier 35B Intelligence for Co-work</strong></p>
 
32
  <div align="center" style="line-height: 1;">
33
  <a href="https://accio-lab.github.io/occamy/"><img alt="Project Website" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Website-Occamy--1.0-087F6A"></a>
34
  <a href="https://huggingface.co/Accio-Lab/Occamy-1.0"><img alt="Hugging Face" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/%F0%9F%A4%97%20Model-Occamy--1.0-FFD21E"></a>
 
35
  <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.11977"><img alt="Technical Report" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/%F0%9F%93%84%20Report-Occamy--1.0-B31B1B"></a>
36
+ <a href="https://github.com/Accio-Lab/Dressage"><img alt="Dressage" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Training-Dressage-087F6A"></a>
37
  <a href="LICENSE"><img alt="License" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/License-Apache%202.0-blue"></a>
38
  </div>
39
 
40
+ ## Available Checkpoints
41
+
42
+ | Format | Repository | Notes |
43
+ |---|---|---|
44
+ | Original BF16 | [Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0](https://huggingface.co/Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0) | Original model weights and configuration. |
45
+ | GGUF | [Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-GGUF](https://huggingface.co/Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-GGUF) | Q4_K_M, Q8_0, and the matching F16 vision projector. Normalize text inputs to NFC; see the model card for tokenizer compatibility. |
46
+ | FP8 | [Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-FP8](https://huggingface.co/Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-FP8) | Blockwise FP8 weights with dynamic activation quantization; see the model card for serving instructions and paired BF16 evaluation. |
47
+ | NVFP4 | [Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-NVFP4](https://huggingface.co/Accio-Lab/occamy-1.0-NVFP4) | Mixed-precision ModelOpt checkpoint with NVFP4 routed experts. See its model card for the tested runtime and hardware requirements. |
48
+
49
+ The quantized releases include bounded regression checks, not a re-run of the full benchmarks below. They do not include MTP weights; MTP combinations are being evaluated separately.
50
 
51
  ## 1. Model Introduction
52
 
 
89
 
90
  <div align="center">
91
  <picture>
92
+ <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Accio-Lab/occamy/9818009b54abbbc5f3c5620c93dfbf7e5b90dd06/assets/occamy-main-results.svg" width="100%" alt="Occamy-1.0 results on co-work, tool-use, coding, and business benchmarks">
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
93
  </picture>
94
  </div>
95
 
96
+ | Benchmark | Occamy-1.0 | Qwen3.6<br>35B-A3B | Agents-A1 | Nex-N2-mini | BigBang-1.0 | Ornith-1.5 |
97
+ | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
98
+ | Claw-Eval (average) | **82.2** | 69.5 | 69.9 | 66.6 | 63.5 | 64.4 |
99
+ | Claw-Eval (PassΒ³) | **71.4** | 54.8 | 41.7 | 37.0 | 40.2 | 48.7 |
100
+ | WildClawBench | **49.16** | 40.4 | 30.73 | 30.31 | 32.87 | 45.91 |
101
+ | CommerceAgentBench | **37.40** | 19.6 | 9.3 | 16.8 | 30.8 | **37.40** |
102
+ | Business Arena | **$79,868** | $44,751 | $33,626 | $13,325 | $56,477 | $66,292 |
103
+ | GDPval | **1,128** | 1,004 | 869 | 999 | 951 | 855 |
104
+ | OfficeQA Pro | 48.1 | 39.1 | 23.3 | 46.6 | 43.6 | **59.4** |
105
+ | τ³-Bench (Banking) | **37.1** | 11.9 | 7.2 | 25.8 | 10.3 | 21.7 |
106
+ | AutomationBench (PassΒΉ) | **27.6** | 7.5 | 2.2 | 5.7 | 14.8 | 18.5 |
107
+ | AutomationBench (partial) | **69.1** | 39.4 | 14.7 | 27.9 | 47.4 | 58.0 |
108
+ | BFCL v4 | 65.40 | 63.19 | 57.23 | 62.81 | 57.86 | **68.51** |
109
+ | VitaBench | 41.75 | 34.25 | 37.00 | 26.25 | **46.00** | 40.25 |
110
+ | Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 59.0 | 49.5 | 41.6 | 60.7<sup>*</sup> | 33.7 | **67.8<sup>*</sup>** |
111
+ | IFEval | 91.53 | 86.90 | **91.60** | **91.60** | 90.50 | 81.80 |
112
+
113
+ **Bold:** Best result in each row; ties are both bolded. <sup>*</sup> Official model-card result.
114
 
115
  ## 4. Training Recipe
116
 
117
+ Occamy is trained through two complementary specialization tracks, followed by parameter-space consolidation and a final SAO stage:
118
 
119
  ```text
120
+ Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
121
+ β”‚
122
+ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
123
+ β”‚ β”‚
124
+ β–Ό β–Ό
125
+ Marathon Expert Sprint Expert
126
+ SFT β†’ HDPO SFT
127
+ β”‚ β”‚
128
+ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
129
+ β–Ό
130
+ Uniform parameter-space merge
131
+ β”‚
132
+ β–Ό
133
+ SAO
134
+ β”‚
135
+ β–Ό
136
+ Occamy-1.0
137
  ```
138
 
139
  The Marathon Expert learns sustained execution and accuracy-conditioned efficiency, while the Sprint Expert preserves broader agentic capability. A uniform parameter-space merge combines both experts into one checkpoint with no inference-time routing or ensembling, and a final Single-Rollout Asynchronous Optimization (SAO) stage refines the merged policy on a broad co-work mixture.
 
230
 
231
  ---
232
 
233
+ ## 8. Contact and Correspondence
234
+
235
+ For research inquiries, model questions, or collaboration opportunities, please contact the corresponding authors:
236
+
237
+ - [Junbo Li](mailto:junboolee@gmail.com)
238
+ - [Hongwei Xue](mailto:xuehongwe@gmail.com)
239
 
240
+ For bug reports or feature requests, please open an [issue](https://github.com/Accio-Lab/occamy/issues).