Instructions to use AlexWortega/tinyvla with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- LeRobot
How to use AlexWortega/tinyvla with LeRobot:
# No code snippets available yet for this library. # To use this model, check the repository files and the library's documentation. # Want to help? PRs adding snippets are welcome at: # https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface.js
- Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
Upload tinyvla2/RESULTS.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files- tinyvla2/RESULTS.md +32 -0
tinyvla2/RESULTS.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -219,3 +219,35 @@ learning needs exemplars in the attention stream where query tokens can attend t
|
|
| 219 |
them selectively (RoboCat-style separate demo cross-attention, or explicit
|
| 220 |
retrieval), not "placed alongside" where the network marginalizes them as constant
|
| 221 |
noise. BEST CHECKPOINT OF THE SERIES REMAINS v2 (261mm on LeKiwi zero-shot).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 219 |
them selectively (RoboCat-style separate demo cross-attention, or explicit
|
| 220 |
retrieval), not "placed alongside" where the network marginalizes them as constant
|
| 221 |
noise. BEST CHECKPOINT OF THE SERIES REMAINS v2 (261mm on LeKiwi zero-shot).
|
| 222 |
+
|
| 223 |
+
## DEMO-ONLY β all identity channels removed (5th and final in-context attempt)
|
| 224 |
+
Removed embodiment-ID, morphology descriptor AND robot text; the K=4 demo exemplars
|
| 225 |
+
in the LM attention stream were the ONLY cue for which robot this is (per-source
|
| 226 |
+
action normalization creates the pressure: correct prediction requires knowing the
|
| 227 |
+
robot's action scale, available only from demos). Held-out LeKiwi:
|
| 228 |
+
|
| 229 |
+
| condition | step 5k | step 10k |
|
| 230 |
+
|---|---|---|
|
| 231 |
+
| REAL LeKiwi demos | 376.1 mm | 323.6 mm |
|
| 232 |
+
| GARBAGE/noise demos | 393.4 mm | 322.1 mm |
|
| 233 |
+
| OTHER-ROBOT (jaco) demos | 330.3 mm | 294.8 mm |
|
| 234 |
+
|
| 235 |
+
At 5k a spread finally appeared (63mm β the first time any demo variant showed
|
| 236 |
+
content-sensitivity) but by 10k it COLLAPSED back: real (323.6) β garbage (322.1).
|
| 237 |
+
Other-robot demos "win" only because they regress toward the training distribution,
|
| 238 |
+
not because demos are read. Training stopped at 10k (no point burning 7 more hours).
|
| 239 |
+
|
| 240 |
+
### In-context demo conditioning: FINAL VERDICT after 5 architectures
|
| 241 |
+
1. MLP encoder, same-task exemplars β dead (real β garbage)
|
| 242 |
+
2. MLP encoder, cross-task exemplars β dead (but +regularization: 295β261mm)
|
| 243 |
+
3. High-capacity encoder (24x params, spatial groups) β dead
|
| 244 |
+
4. Demos inside the LM attention stream (rich-slow, dual-rate preserved) β dead
|
| 245 |
+
5. Demos as the ONLY identity channel β brief flicker at 5k, dead by 10k
|
| 246 |
+
Neither sampling, capacity, architectural placement, nor removing all alternatives
|
| 247 |
+
makes this model read demonstration content. Plausible remaining explanation: the
|
| 248 |
+
flow head predicts from the CURRENT observation, and nothing in the training
|
| 249 |
+
objective ever *requires* comparing the current scene to an exemplar β the robot is
|
| 250 |
+
visually identifiable in-frame (an identity leak we cannot remove), so the model
|
| 251 |
+
always has a cheaper route than reading demos.
|
| 252 |
+
**Working mechanism remains the numeric morphology descriptor (C-diverse: 150mm on
|
| 253 |
+
held-out jaco). Best LeKiwi zero-shot: C-incontext-v2 at 261mm.**
|