AlexWortega commited on
Commit
b38cd5f
Β·
verified Β·
1 Parent(s): 59eb9ad

Upload tinyvla2/RESULTS.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. tinyvla2/RESULTS.md +32 -0
tinyvla2/RESULTS.md CHANGED
@@ -219,3 +219,35 @@ learning needs exemplars in the attention stream where query tokens can attend t
219
  them selectively (RoboCat-style separate demo cross-attention, or explicit
220
  retrieval), not "placed alongside" where the network marginalizes them as constant
221
  noise. BEST CHECKPOINT OF THE SERIES REMAINS v2 (261mm on LeKiwi zero-shot).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
219
  them selectively (RoboCat-style separate demo cross-attention, or explicit
220
  retrieval), not "placed alongside" where the network marginalizes them as constant
221
  noise. BEST CHECKPOINT OF THE SERIES REMAINS v2 (261mm on LeKiwi zero-shot).
222
+
223
+ ## DEMO-ONLY β€” all identity channels removed (5th and final in-context attempt)
224
+ Removed embodiment-ID, morphology descriptor AND robot text; the K=4 demo exemplars
225
+ in the LM attention stream were the ONLY cue for which robot this is (per-source
226
+ action normalization creates the pressure: correct prediction requires knowing the
227
+ robot's action scale, available only from demos). Held-out LeKiwi:
228
+
229
+ | condition | step 5k | step 10k |
230
+ |---|---|---|
231
+ | REAL LeKiwi demos | 376.1 mm | 323.6 mm |
232
+ | GARBAGE/noise demos | 393.4 mm | 322.1 mm |
233
+ | OTHER-ROBOT (jaco) demos | 330.3 mm | 294.8 mm |
234
+
235
+ At 5k a spread finally appeared (63mm β€” the first time any demo variant showed
236
+ content-sensitivity) but by 10k it COLLAPSED back: real (323.6) β‰ˆ garbage (322.1).
237
+ Other-robot demos "win" only because they regress toward the training distribution,
238
+ not because demos are read. Training stopped at 10k (no point burning 7 more hours).
239
+
240
+ ### In-context demo conditioning: FINAL VERDICT after 5 architectures
241
+ 1. MLP encoder, same-task exemplars β€” dead (real β‰ˆ garbage)
242
+ 2. MLP encoder, cross-task exemplars β€” dead (but +regularization: 295β†’261mm)
243
+ 3. High-capacity encoder (24x params, spatial groups) β€” dead
244
+ 4. Demos inside the LM attention stream (rich-slow, dual-rate preserved) β€” dead
245
+ 5. Demos as the ONLY identity channel β€” brief flicker at 5k, dead by 10k
246
+ Neither sampling, capacity, architectural placement, nor removing all alternatives
247
+ makes this model read demonstration content. Plausible remaining explanation: the
248
+ flow head predicts from the CURRENT observation, and nothing in the training
249
+ objective ever *requires* comparing the current scene to an exemplar β€” the robot is
250
+ visually identifiable in-frame (an identity leak we cannot remove), so the model
251
+ always has a cheaper route than reading demos.
252
+ **Working mechanism remains the numeric morphology descriptor (C-diverse: 150mm on
253
+ held-out jaco). Best LeKiwi zero-shot: C-incontext-v2 at 261mm.**