|
Download docs/strict_baseline_paper_notes.md from Anonymous1611/Lattice_Spike: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 2.71 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/Anonymous1611/Lattice_Spike/resolve/main/docs/strict_baseline_paper_notes.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://Anonymous1611/Lattice_Spike/docs/strict_baseline_paper_notes.md
-
curl -L -o strict_baseline_paper_notes.md https://huggingface.co/Anonymous1611/Lattice_Spike/resolve/main/docs/strict_baseline_paper_notes.md
2.71 kB
| # Strict Baseline Paper Notes | |
| These notes summarize the detector designs used by the strict LLaMA baseline | |
| branch. | |
| ## Sources | |
| - EPR: "Learned Hallucination Detection in Black-Box LLMs using Token-level | |
| Entropy Production Rate" (`arXiv:2509.04492`), plus the Artefactual public | |
| implementation: https://github.com/artefactory/artefactual | |
| - Lookback Lens: "Lookback Lens: Detecting and Mitigating Contextual | |
| Hallucinations in Large Language Models Using Only Attention Maps" | |
| (`arXiv:2407.07071`), plus the public implementation: | |
| https://github.com/voidism/Lookback-Lens | |
| - Multi-View Attention: "Hallucinated Span Detection with Multi-View Attention | |
| Features" (`arXiv:2504.04335`, ACL Anthology `2025.starsem-1.31`), plus the | |
| public implementation: https://github.com/Ogamon958/mva_hal_det | |
| ## Strict Mapping | |
| | Method | Paper/reference approach | Our implementation | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | | |
| | EPR | Computes top-k per-token entropy contribution `-p log2(p)` and sums rank contributions into a token score. | Teacher-forces the saved generated token IDs, extracts top-15 next-token log-probabilities, and computes the same `-exp(logp) * log2(exp(logp))` contribution in `float32`. | | |
| | Lookback Lens | Computes each layer/head's `context_attention / (context_attention + generated_attention)`, then averages complete trailing windows before logistic regression. | Computes the same ratio from Hugging Face attention tensors, uses full trailing windows of size 8 for the strict run, max-pools hallucination-positive labels, and trains logistic regression with `max_iter=1000`. | | |
| | Multi-View Attention | Uses three feature families per token: average incoming attention, incoming attention entropy, and outgoing attention entropy; feeds standardized features into a Transformer encoder with CRF decoding and selects hyperparameters by validation F1 search. | Extracts `key_avg`, `key_entropy`, and `query_entropy` by default; `key_avg` and `key_entropy` use the paper's adjusted incoming attention; standardizes the train split; runs a 200-trial Optuna search over the paper/public hyperparameter ranges; trains a Transformer-CRF with AdamW, ReduceLROnPlateau validation-loss scheduling, validation F1 early stopping, batch size 64, and up to 150 epochs. | | |
| ## Scope | |
| The strict run evaluates these detector methods on our LLaMA 3.2 | |
| token-labelled dataset. It does not claim to reproduce the papers' benchmark | |
| numbers, because those depend on the original datasets, model sizes, prompt | |
| collections, and train/validation/test partitions. | |
| The safe claim is: We implemented and evaluated strict detector-method paths | |
| for EPR, Lookback Lens, and Multi-View Attention on our LLaMA 3.2 | |
| token-labelled dataset. | |