rTaste: Do Research Agents Have Taste? Evaluating Early Stage Research Judgment Paper • 2610.40488 • Published 10 days ago • 3
rTaste: Do Research Agents Have Taste? Evaluating Early Stage Research Judgment Paper • 2610.40488 • Published 10 days ago • 3
rTaste: Do Research Agents Have Taste? Evaluating Early Stage Research Judgment Paper • 2610.40488 • Published 10 days ago • 3
Into the Unknown: Benchmarking AI agents on open scientific research problems Paper • 2610.19159 • Published 27 days ago • 56
AutoSciBench: Autonomous Benchmark Generation for Evaluating Scientific Agents Paper • 2610.05140 • Published Oct 4 • 33
The Tasteful Agent: Measuring and Improving Taste in Long-Horizon Tasks Paper • 2609.25804 • Published Sep 22 • 33
Reinforcing Agentic Creativity in Scientific Ideation with Night Science Paper • 2609.35706 • Published Sep 28 • 5
SciGen-Verifier: A Multimodal Reasoner for Explainable Verification in Scientific Image Generation Paper • 2609.33399 • Published Sep 27 • 15
AutoDataBench: Can Agents Write the Data That Feeds the Self-Improvement Loop? Paper • 2609.35025 • Published Sep 28 • 7
MILO: Automated Harness Discovery via Orchestrated Multi-Agent Evolution Paper • 2609.38349 • Published Sep 29 • 21
OSWorld-Science: A Benchmark of Computer Use Agents for Learning and Using Scientific Software Paper • 2609.39903 • Published Sep 30 • 28
ScholarCatalyst: A Benchmark for Retrieving Papers That Inspire New Research Paper • 2610.02202 • Published Oct 1 • 12
A Missing Piece for Trustworthy AI Reviewers: From Benchmarking Rhetorical Robustness to SciCore Review Paper • 2609.39027 • Published Sep 30 • 20