Yep, thanks. I'm aware of that. There are 11 gguf files in this repo, so a single "Fetch" operation could be counted as an inflated aggregate.
Even so, it seems problematic that the aggregate count appears so uniform. The upward trend seen in recent aggregates reflects metrics from when we temporarily disabled gated user access; even then, 1.5k aggregates were added over a period of just under a day.
The reason I mentioned “Likes” and “Community” activity is that this model hadn’t experienced any recent events that would generate hype, and its download numbers had always been negligible.
I really hope the cause is identified.