Download README.md from ERISLab/FGIR-ViT: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 11.2 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/ERISLab/FGIR-ViT/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://ERISLab/FGIR-ViT/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/ERISLab/FGIR-ViT/resolve/main/README.md
pipeline_tag: image-classification
library_name: fgir-zoo
tags:
- fine-grained
- ultra-fine-grained
- image-classification
- vision-transformer
- parameter-efficient
- resnet
- adapter
- petl
FGIR-ViT
Vision-transformer checkpoints for ultra-fine-grained image recognition (UFGIR) — telling apart
cultivars within a species (soybean, cotton and other leaf sets) where classes differ by tiny
visual margins and samples per class are scarce. Almost every checkpoint is an ImageNet-21k
ViT-B/16 with the backbone frozen; only a small set of adapter modules is trained, so a model is a
340 MB file of which ~2 M parameters were actually learned. The 96 MB files).ila_saw_resnet_448 group applies
SAW to a frozen timm ResNet-50 instead (
The repository gathers the checkpoints behind two lines of work from the ERIS Lab:
- ILA — the down-sampling inter-layer adapter, and SAW, a semantic-adaptation warmup added on
top of it (the
ila_*groups). ILA was introduced in the ECCV 2024 EFM workshop paper below. - AAA — the attention-aggregation adapter, which replaces ILA's convolutional down-sampler with a
bottleneck attention that fixes the adapter's misplaced attention (the
aaa_*groups).
The full fine-tuning FGIR benchmark (FGIRFT) is now a separate repository, ERISLab/FGIRFT.
847 checkpoints, one seed per configuration, last epoch only. Everything is described in
manifest.csv and loadable by name with the standalone fgir_zoo library (no training repo needed).
Part of the ERISLab FGIR-ViT collection.
Training recipe
Backbone vit_b16 (ImageNet-21k), frozen. The trainable part is the adapter family named in the
filename (a plain PETL adapter, ILA's down-sampling adapter, or the AAA attention-aggregation
adapter); the SAW runs add a supervised-contrastive warmup stage before the classifier is trained.
Images are ImageNet-normalized and evaluated at 224, 448 or 672 px. Each embedded config (an
argparse namespace saved in the checkpoint) records the exact settings.
What each folder holds
Files are grouped by experiment line and named <dataset>_<model>_<method>_<serial>[_<variant>].pth;
the trailing number is the run's wandb serial, and the name ends in it because only the last epoch is
kept (so "last" is implied). <variant> is a resolution tag (_is224/448/672) where one serial
spans several resolutions.
| Group | Line / paper | Backbone | What it is |
|---|---|---|---|
ila_main_224 / ila_main_448 |
ILA/SAW | vit_b16 | Main UFGIR comparison of ILA against PETL and FGIR baselines, at 224 / 448 |
ila_ablations |
ILA/SAW | vit_b16 | ILA design ablations |
ila_saw, ila_saw_deit, ila_saw_no_ila |
ILA/SAW | vit_b16 / pedeit | The SAW contrastive-warmup runs |
ila_swin, ila_dinov2, ila_foundation |
ILA/SAW | peswin / pevit | ILA on other backbones and frozen foundation baselines |
ila_equal_compute |
ILA/SAW | vit_b16 | Equal-compute control |
deit_grid_448 |
ILA/SAW | pedeit / pedeit3 | DeiT and DeiT III at 448: frozen, adapter and ILA++ arms on the ten UFGIR sets |
dinov2_adaptformer_224 |
ILA/SAW | pevit (DINOv2 ViT-B/14) | DINOv2 at 224: frozen head (3021), AdaptFormer (3002), AdaptFormer + ILA (3031) |
saw_birds_448 |
ILA/SAW | vit_b16 | NABirds adapter baseline at 448 (3112) |
saw_resnet_warmup |
ILA/SAW | peresnet50 | The two ResNet-50 SAW warmups on the pooled leaves (291 adapter, 294 ILA) |
ila_saw_resnet_448 |
ILA/SAW | peresnet50 | SAW on a frozen ResNet-50 at 448: the SAW arms, their no-SAW and linear-probe baselines, and the two SAW warmups |
aaa_main_224 / aaa_main_448 / aaa_main_672 |
AAA | vit_b16 | The AAA finals (frozen / adapter / ILA++ / AAA arms), by resolution |
aaa_ablations |
AAA | vit_b16 | AAA ablations on SoyGlobal and SoyLocal: insertion blocks (424/428/430, 224 px) and width (411/413/415, 448 px) |
aaa_fungi |
AAA (breadth) | vit_b16 | FungiTastic breadth probe — kept for completeness, not a paper result |
medical_idrid, medical_petl |
AAA (medical) | vit_b16 | Medical-imaging PETL and IDRiD resolution runs |
The ILA/SAW paper evaluates the ila_main, ila_saw and ila_saw_resnet_448 serials; the AAA paper evaluates the
aaa_main_* serials. manifest.csv maps every file to its dataset, method, serial, resolution,
num_classes, top-1 accuracy and sha256.
SAW on ResNet-50 (ila_saw_resnet_448)
The CNN counterpart of the SAW ladder, for the SAW paper in IEEE Transactions on AgriFood
Electronics. The backbone is timm's resnet50, frozen, at 448 px (peresnet50); the adapter is a
1x1 bottleneck ConvAdapter on every ResNet block's output, and the ILA variant adds the
down-sampling adapter before the last stage. The ten datasets are cotton, soyageing,
soyageingr1/r3/r4/r5/r6, soygene, soyglobal and soylocal.
| Serial | Role | method in manifest.csv |
Files |
|---|---|---|---|
| 292 | Method: adapter + SAW | cls_adapter_saw_fz |
10 |
| 295 | Method: adapter + ILA + SAW | ila_dso_cls_adapter_saw_fz |
10 |
| 290 | Baseline: adapter | cls_adapter_fz |
10 |
| 293 | Baseline: adapter + ILA | ila_dso_cls_adapter_fz |
10 |
| 661 | Baseline: FZ, frozen linear probe | fz |
10 |
| 291 | SAW stage-1 warmup for 292 | cls_adapter_supcon_fz |
1 |
| 294 | SAW stage-1 warmup for 295 | ila_dso_cls_adapter_supcon_fz |
1 |
- 292 trains the adapter and classifier on each dataset, starting from the 291 warmup.
- 295 does the same with the ILA down-sampler, starting from the 294 warmup.
- 290 trains the same adapter from a fresh initialisation, without SAW.
- 293 trains adapter + ILA from a fresh initialisation, without SAW.
- 661 (FZ) keeps the whole backbone frozen and trains only a linear head. All ten datasets
are released; wandb
nycu_pcs/AAAholds all 30 runs. - 291 and 294 are the supervised-contrastive warmups on the leaves set (100 epochs). Their
head is a projection, so the forward returns a 2048-d embedding and the stored
accuracy(0.03 and 0.00) is not a classification score.
The filenames of SAW and no-SAW runs differ only in the serial (_292 against _290), so the
manifest's method marks SAW with _saw_, read from the run's warmup ckpt_path. Each file's
accuracy is its own single seed (seed 3 for the fine-tunes, seed 2 for soygene 661, seed 1 for
the warmups). The papers' three-seed means
are in ILA_SAW_Analysis/results_all/acc/resnet_ladder.csv; over the ten datasets they average
56.05 (290), 64.64 (292), 54.30 (293) and 65.01 (295), and 30.73 for FZ.
A real forward on one SoyLocal test image with the 295 checkpoint:
import torch, torchvision.transforms as T
from PIL import Image
import fgir_zoo
model = fgir_zoo.load('fgirvit/ila_saw_resnet_448/soylocal_peresnet50_ila_dso_cls_adapter_fz_295')
tf = T.Compose([T.Resize(600), T.CenterCrop(448), T.ToTensor(), # config.test_resize_size = 600
T.Normalize([0.485, 0.456, 0.406], [0.229, 0.224, 0.225])])
x = tf(Image.open('soylocal/soybean200_square/2_6_test.png').convert('RGB')).unsqueeze(0)
with torch.no_grad():
probs = model(x).softmax(-1) # -> (1, 200)
pred = probs.argmax(-1).item()
# pred = 1, confidence 0.905 — the true class is 1, so this sample is correct.
On the first 12 SoyLocal test images this checkpoint is right 3 times; its stored test accuracy on the full split is 49.8%.
Load a checkpoint
Standalone, no fgir_vit install — the model code is vendored inside fgir_zoo:
pip install git+https://github.com/arkel23/fgir-zoo.git
import fgir_zoo
model = fgir_zoo.load('fgirvit/aaa_main_448/soylocal_vit_b16_aaa_dso_cls_adapter_fz_403')
model.eval()
# fgir_zoo.list_models(family='fgirvit') lists every name; model.config holds the run's settings.
Or fetch the file directly and load it yourself:
import torch, torchvision.transforms as T
from PIL import Image
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
path = hf_hub_download('ERISLab/FGIR-ViT',
'aaa_main_448/soylocal_vit_b16_aaa_dso_cls_adapter_fz_403.pth')
ckpt = torch.load(path, map_location='cpu', weights_only=False) # dict: config, model, accuracy, epoch
A real forward on one SoyLocal test image, with the model loaded above (ImageNet-normalized, 448 px):
tf = T.Compose([T.Resize(600), T.CenterCrop(448), T.ToTensor(), # config.test_resize_size = 600
T.Normalize([0.485, 0.456, 0.406], [0.229, 0.224, 0.225])])
x = tf(Image.open('soylocal/soybean200_square/1_2_test.png').convert('RGB')).unsqueeze(0)
logits = model(x) # -> (1, 200)
pred = logits.softmax(-1).argmax(-1).item()
# pred = 0, confidence 0.318 — the true class is 0, so this sample is correct.
On the first 12 SoyLocal test images this checkpoint is right 6 times, matching its 55.5% test accuracy on the full split.
Results (each file's own score, not the paper's aggregate)
SoyLocal (200 cultivars) top-1, the released single-seed checkpoints, by arm and resolution:
| Arm | 224 | 448 | 672 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frozen | 28.0 | 45.3 | 27.5 |
| Adapter | 33.0 | 55.7 | 36.3 |
| ILA++ | 54.7 | 55.2 | 54.0 |
| AAA | 45.7 | 55.5 | 56.7 |
These are individual checkpoints on one dataset and one seed; they are noisier than the papers'
means over ten datasets and three seeds. The papers report the aggregate (ILA with SAW averages
73.5% at 448 across the ten UFGIR sets). Every per-file score is the accuracy column of
manifest.csv.
Superseded and non-paper runs
Kept for completeness but not printed in any paper: aaa_fungi (on FungiTastic the plain adapter
beats AAA, so it does not carry the method) and the medical breadth runs. Learning-rate searches,
extra seeds, best-epoch copies and exploratory ablations were removed during consolidation and are
not in this repository.
Requirements
torch>=2.5,timm==0.9.12(the checkpoints were trained on it and the vendored model code forks that version — newer timm changes the ViT internals),huggingface_hub,safetensors,einops,ml_collections.peresnet50needsfgir_zoowith the FGIR-ViT model code at commitaabb221or later.- The 15
ila_sawSAW contrastive-head checkpoints carry an older projection-head layout; their manifestloadsisFalseandfgir_zoorefuses them rather than loading loosely.
Citation
The published ILA method:
@inproceedings{rios2024ila,
title = {Down-Sampling Inter-Layer Adapter for Parameter and Computation Efficient
Ultra-Fine-Grained Image Recognition},
author = {Rios, Edwin Arkel and Oyerinde, Femiloye and Hu, Min-Chun and Lai, Bo-Cheng},
booktitle = {Efficient Deep Learning for Foundation Models (EFM) Workshop at the European
Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},
year = {2024}
}
The SAW extension and the AAA (attention-aggregation adapter) paper are under submission; this card will be updated with their citations when they are available.