convaiinnovations/laya
Text Classification • 0.4B • Updated • 3.38k
Moonoyee PRO
Noomam
·
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
liked a model about 14 hours ago
convaiinnovations/laya liked a model about 14 hours ago
abenzerps/Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF liked a Space almost 2 years ago
KlingTeam/LivePortraitOrganizations
None yet
liked 2
models about 14 hours ago
liked a
Space almost 2 years ago
reacted to Xenova's post with ❤️ over 2 years ago
Post
Introducing Remove Background Web: In-browser background removal, powered by @briaai 's new RMBG-v1.4 model and 🤗 Transformers.js!
Everything runs 100% locally, meaning none of your images are uploaded to a server! 🤯 At only ~45MB, the 8-bit quantized version of the model is perfect for in-browser usage (it even works on mobile).
Check it out! 👇
Demo: Xenova/remove-background-web
Model: briaai/RMBG-1.4
Everything runs 100% locally, meaning none of your images are uploaded to a server! 🤯 At only ~45MB, the 8-bit quantized version of the model is perfect for in-browser usage (it even works on mobile).
Check it out! 👇
Demo: Xenova/remove-background-web
Model: briaai/RMBG-1.4
- 9 replies
reacted to Sentdex's post with 🤗 over 2 years ago
Post
Hi, welcome to my first post here!
I am slowly wrangling about 5 years of reddit comments (2015-2020). It's a total of billions samples that can be filtered as comment-reply pairs, chains of discussion, filtered by subreddit, up/down votes, controversy, sentiment, and more.
Any requests or ideas for curated datasets from here? I'll also tinker with uploading the entire dataset potentially in chunks or something, but it's quite a few terabytes in total, so I'll need to break it up still. I have some ideas for datasets I personally want too, but curious if anyone has something they'd really like to see that sounds interesting too.
I am slowly wrangling about 5 years of reddit comments (2015-2020). It's a total of billions samples that can be filtered as comment-reply pairs, chains of discussion, filtered by subreddit, up/down votes, controversy, sentiment, and more.
Any requests or ideas for curated datasets from here? I'll also tinker with uploading the entire dataset potentially in chunks or something, but it's quite a few terabytes in total, so I'll need to break it up still. I have some ideas for datasets I personally want too, but curious if anyone has something they'd really like to see that sounds interesting too.
- 7 replies
reacted to Sentdex's post with 👍 over 2 years ago
Post
Working through the Reddit dataset, one thing that occurs to me is we pretty much always train LLMs to be a conversation between 2 parties like Bot/Human or Instruction/Response.
It seems far more common with internet data that we have multi-speaker/group discussions with a dynamic number of speakers. This also seems to be more realistic to the real world too and requires a bit more understanding to model.
Is there some research into this? I have some ideas of how I'd like to implement it, but I wonder if some work has already been done here?
It seems far more common with internet data that we have multi-speaker/group discussions with a dynamic number of speakers. This also seems to be more realistic to the real world too and requires a bit more understanding to model.
Is there some research into this? I have some ideas of how I'd like to implement it, but I wonder if some work has already been done here?
- 6 replies
reacted to Xenova's post with ❤️ over 2 years ago
Post
Real-time object detection w/ 🤗 Transformers.js, running YOLOv9 locally in your browser! 🤯
Try it out yourself: Xenova/video-object-detection
(Model used + example code: Xenova/gelan-c_all)
This demo shows why on-device ML is so important:
1. Privacy - local inference means no user data is sent to the cloud
2. No server latency - empowers developers to build real-time applications
3. Lower costs - no need to pay for bandwidth and processing of streamed video
I can't wait to see what you build with it! 🔥
Try it out yourself: Xenova/video-object-detection
(Model used + example code: Xenova/gelan-c_all)
This demo shows why on-device ML is so important:
1. Privacy - local inference means no user data is sent to the cloud
2. No server latency - empowers developers to build real-time applications
3. Lower costs - no need to pay for bandwidth and processing of streamed video
I can't wait to see what you build with it! 🔥
- 3 replies
reacted to Xenova's post with ❤️ over 2 years ago
Post
Introducing the 🤗 Transformers.js WebGPU Embedding Benchmark! ⚡️
👉 Xenova/webgpu-embedding-benchmark 👈
On my device, I was able to achieve a 64.04x speedup over WASM! 🤯 How much does WebGPU speed up ML models running locally in your browser? Try it out and share your results! 🚀
👉 Xenova/webgpu-embedding-benchmark 👈
On my device, I was able to achieve a 64.04x speedup over WASM! 🤯 How much does WebGPU speed up ML models running locally in your browser? Try it out and share your results! 🚀
- 3 replies
reacted to Xenova's post with 🔥 over 2 years ago
Post
13408
Introducing MusicGen Web: AI-powered music generation directly in your browser, built with 🤗 Transformers.js! 🎵
Everything runs 100% locally, meaning there are no calls to an API! 🤯 Since it's served as a static HF space, it costs $0 to host and run! 🔥
We also added the ability to share your generated music to the discussion tab, so give it a try! 👇
Xenova/musicgen-web
Everything runs 100% locally, meaning there are no calls to an API! 🤯 Since it's served as a static HF space, it costs $0 to host and run! 🔥
We also added the ability to share your generated music to the discussion tab, so give it a try! 👇
Xenova/musicgen-web
- 2 replies
reacted to Sentdex's post with 👍 over 2 years ago
Post
8131
Benchmarks!
I have lately been diving deep into the main benchmarks we all use to evaluate and compare models.
If you've never actually looked under the hood for how benchmarks work, check out the LM eval harness from EleutherAI: https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness
+ check out the benchmark datasets, you can find the ones for the LLM leaderboard on the about tab here: https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard, then click the dataset and actually peak at the data that comprises these benchmarks.
It feels to me like benchmarks only represent a tiny portion of what we actually use and want LLMs for, and I doubt I'm alone in that sentiment.
Beyond this, the actual evaluations of responses from models are extremely strict and often use even rudimentary NLP techniques when, at this point, we have LLMs themselves that are more than capable at evaluating and scoring responses.
It feels like we've made great strides in the quality of LLMs themselves, but almost no change in the quality of how we benchmark.
If you have any ideas for how benchmarks could be a better assessment of an LLM, or know of good research papers that tackle this challenge, please share!
I have lately been diving deep into the main benchmarks we all use to evaluate and compare models.
If you've never actually looked under the hood for how benchmarks work, check out the LM eval harness from EleutherAI: https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness
+ check out the benchmark datasets, you can find the ones for the LLM leaderboard on the about tab here: https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard, then click the dataset and actually peak at the data that comprises these benchmarks.
It feels to me like benchmarks only represent a tiny portion of what we actually use and want LLMs for, and I doubt I'm alone in that sentiment.
Beyond this, the actual evaluations of responses from models are extremely strict and often use even rudimentary NLP techniques when, at this point, we have LLMs themselves that are more than capable at evaluating and scoring responses.
It feels like we've made great strides in the quality of LLMs themselves, but almost no change in the quality of how we benchmark.
If you have any ideas for how benchmarks could be a better assessment of an LLM, or know of good research papers that tackle this challenge, please share!
- 3 replies
reacted to Sentdex's post with 👍🤗 over 2 years ago
Post
10893
Okay, first pass over KAN: Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks, it looks very interesting!
Interpretability of KAN model:
May be considered mostly as a safety issue these days, but it can also be used as a form of interaction between the user and a model, as this paper argues and I think they make a valid point here. With MLP, we only interact with the outputs, but KAN is an entirely different paradigm and I find it compelling.
Scalability:
KAN shows better parameter efficiency than MLP. This likely translates also to needing less data. We're already at the point with the frontier LLMs where all the data available from the internet is used + more is made synthetically...so we kind of need something better.
Continual learning:
KAN can handle new input information w/o catastrophic forgetting, which helps to keep a model up to date without relying on some database or retraining.
Sequential data:
This is probably what most people are curious about right now, and KANs are not shown to work with sequential data yet and it's unclear what the best approach might be to make it work well both in training and regarding the interpretability aspect. That said, there's a rich long history of achieving sequential data in variety of ways, so I don't think getting the ball rolling here would be too challenging.
Mostly, I just love a new paradigm and I want to see more!
KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (2404.19756)
Interpretability of KAN model:
May be considered mostly as a safety issue these days, but it can also be used as a form of interaction between the user and a model, as this paper argues and I think they make a valid point here. With MLP, we only interact with the outputs, but KAN is an entirely different paradigm and I find it compelling.
Scalability:
KAN shows better parameter efficiency than MLP. This likely translates also to needing less data. We're already at the point with the frontier LLMs where all the data available from the internet is used + more is made synthetically...so we kind of need something better.
Continual learning:
KAN can handle new input information w/o catastrophic forgetting, which helps to keep a model up to date without relying on some database or retraining.
Sequential data:
This is probably what most people are curious about right now, and KANs are not shown to work with sequential data yet and it's unclear what the best approach might be to make it work well both in training and regarding the interpretability aspect. That said, there's a rich long history of achieving sequential data in variety of ways, so I don't think getting the ball rolling here would be too challenging.
Mostly, I just love a new paradigm and I want to see more!
KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (2404.19756)
- 5 replies
reacted to phenixrhyder's post with 👍 over 2 years ago
Post
2697
Ai splash coffee