AI & ML interests
Human-state-aware AI evaluation, interaction-state measurement derived from language (not model inference), longitudinal interaction dynamics, cognitive load measurement, conversational safety, psychological signal extraction, and AI governance infrastructure.
Recent Activity
Receptiviti Labs
Receptiviti Labs is the AI-focused arm of Receptiviti, developing scientifically grounded measurement infrastructure for human-state-aware AI systems.
Our work focuses on making cognitive and psychological interaction dynamics measurable, observable, and usable within AI evaluation, monitoring, and conversational systems.
Current AI systems adapt to users implicitly through language, but the underlying interaction-state signals influencing model behavior remain largely opaque, inconsistent, and unavailable to the systems meant to evaluate or govern them.
We are interested in approaches that make interaction state explicit, measurable, longitudinally trackable, and inspectable.
200+ psychological dimensions · 34,000+ peer-reviewed citations · 30+ years of psycholinguistic research
Website · Research · API Docs
Research Areas
- Human-state-aware AI evaluation
- Longitudinal conversational dynamics
- Cognitive load measurement
- Psychological signal extraction from language
- Interaction-state instrumentation
- AI safety and governance
- Conversational system observability
- State-conditioned evaluation frameworks
- Human-AI interaction measurement
- Longitudinal risk and escalation dynamics
Focus
Our current work explores how explicit interaction-state measurement can support:
- Better AI evaluation frameworks
- Safer conversational systems
- Longitudinal interaction monitoring
- Context-aware AI behavior
- Human-centered AI governance
- State-conditioned response adaptation
Selected Publications
Salecha, Ireland et al., 2024 — Large language models display human-like social desirability biases in personality surveys. PNAS Nexus. LLMs shift responses when they infer they're being evaluated, with effects up to 1.20 human SD across GPT-4, Claude 3, Llama 3, and PaLM-2. Co-authored by Molly Ireland (Receptiviti).
Entwistle, Hoemann, Nightingale & Boyd, 2025 — Psychosocial dynamics of suicidality and nonsuicidal self-injury: a digital linguistic perspective. npj Mental Health Research. Large-scale naturalistic study of language dynamics surrounding suicidality and self-injury across 992 individuals, 66,786 posts. Co-authored by Ryan Boyd (UT Dallas).
Boyd & Markowitz, 2026 — Artificial intelligence and the psychology of human connection. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Introduces the MIRA model — a framework for when and how AI functions as a relational entity in human ecosystems, with language as the primary modality through which that relationship operates.
Vu, Boyd, Eichstaedt et al., 2026 — PsychAdapter: adapting LLMs to reflect traits, personality, and mental health. npj Artificial Intelligence. A lightweight architectural modification generating text that reliably reflects Big Five personality traits (87.3% accuracy) and mental health variables (96.7% accuracy).
Chi, Ganesan, Boyd, Ungar & Guntuku, 2026 (preprint, under review) — When support escalates distress: regulation and escalation in LLM responses to venting and advice-seeking. Across 178,800 Reddit posts, LLM responses to venting simultaneously regulate and escalate distress — escalation invisible to standard safety evaluations.
Full list and ongoing work: Research
Notes
Our measurement approaches draw on validated psycholinguistic and behavioral research methods designed for structured observation of interaction dynamics within AI systems.
We are particularly interested in evaluation and observability approaches that treat interaction state as measurable infrastructure rather than latent implicit inference inside model behavior.