Instructions to use SilverDragon9/Trace.AI with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Scikit-learn
How to use SilverDragon9/Trace.AI with Scikit-learn:
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download import joblib model = joblib.load( hf_hub_download("SilverDragon9/Trace.AI", "sklearn_model.joblib") ) # only load pickle files from sources you trust # read more about it here https://skops.readthedocs.io/en/stable/persistence.html - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
| license: apache-2.0 | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| metrics: | |
| - accuracy | |
| - precision | |
| - f1 | |
| library_name: sklearn | |
| --- | |
| π Use Cases | |
| | Use Case | Description | | |
| |----------------------------------|-------------| | |
| | π Password strength scoring | Quantitative scoring (0β10) for any given password | | |
| | π§ Risk classification | Categorizes passwords as `Weak`, `Fairly Strong`, `Strong` | | |
| | π΅οΈ Threat emulation | Emulates password cracking heuristics to spot vulnerable patterns | | |
| | π§° DevSecOps integration | Plug into CI/CD pipelines for password policy enforcement | | |
| | π¨βπ» User awareness tools | Build frontend UX tools to give users feedback on password creation | | |
| --- | |
| --- | |
| # π Trace.AI - AI-Powered Password Intelligence Engine | |
| **Trace.AI** is an intelligent, ML-driven password checker designed to evaluate the **strength**, **structure**, and **policy compliance** of passwords. | |
| Built for modern security infrastructures, it leverages machine learning to identify weak, predictable, or non-compliant passwords | |
| based on real-world patterns and security datasets. | |
| --- | |
| --- | |
| ## π Core Capabilities | |
| ### β Password Strength Classification | |
| Trace.AI scores passwords as **Weak**, **Fairly Strong**, or **Strong** using a combination of rule-based feature extraction and machine learning. | |
| ### π― Pattern Recognition | |
| Detects predictable and insecure patterns such as: | |
| - Keyboard walks (`qwerty`, `asdf123`) | |
| - Common substitutions (`p@ssw0rd`) | |
| - Repeated sequences (`abcabc`, `123123`) | |
| - Known dictionary or breached password similarities | |
| ### π Policy Compliance | |
| Checks if passwords meet enterprise-grade security policies, including: | |
| - Minimum length and entropy | |
| - Required character types (upper/lowercase, digit, special) | |
| - No whitespace, dictionary words, or reuse | |
| --- | |
| --- | |
| ## π Datasets Used | |
| Trace.AI was trained using curated, high-quality password datasets: | |
| | Dataset | Description | | |
| |--------|-------------| | |
| | **cleanpasswordlist(modified)** | Real-world passwords list, modified and feature engineered for better prediction and scoring | | |
| --- | |
| --- | |
| ## π§ Machine Learning Models | |
| Trace.AI supports and evaluates multiple ML models for robustness: | |
| | Model | Strengths | Use | | |
| |-------|-----------|-----| | |
| | **RandomForest** | Non-linear classification, interpretable, fast | Production baseline | | |
| | **XGBoost** | Handles imbalance, high accuracy, fast inference | Advanced detection | | |
| | **Decision Trees** | Lightweight, interpretable | Edge device / fallback model | | |
| All models are trained using engineered features like: | |
| - Length, character diversity | |
| - Entropy | |
| - Keyboard patterns | |
| - Regex-based leetspeak and substitution scoring | |
| --- | |
| --- | |
| ## Project Goals | |
| Trace.AI is engineered to support the following goals: | |
| | Feature | Description | | |
| |--------|-------------| | |
| | π Password Strength Estimator | Predict if password is Weak, Moderate, or Strong | | |
| | π§ Pattern Analyzer | Identify insecure sequences, leetspeak, keyboard walks | | |
| | π Policy Validator | Check adherence to defined password policies | | |
| | π€ Exportable Reports | Download prediction logs for security audits | | |
| | π Visual Dashboard | UI-based analysis of strength and structure (via Gradio) | | |
| --- |