Unbelievable performance improvements on v2.6! (Overthinking issue fixed)

#5
by aidinmc - opened

Just wanted to share a quick feedback thread in case it saves someone some time.
I spent a lot of time struggling to manage reasoning/overthinking behavior on v2.5, but couldn't get consistent results:

  • Uncapped thinking budget: It would spend nearly 20 minutes reasoning.
  • Strict budget cap: The output quality degraded significantly.

However, v2.6 seems to have completely resolved this issue! It honestly punches way above its weight class—performing on par with +100B models.
I haven't stress-tested it with extremely heavy workflows yet, but it executed all my prompt tasks almost flawlessly without any serious hiccups.

Huge thanks to the maintainers/devs for this release! Fantastic work. 🚀

It definitely punches above its weight class but idk about 100B+ claim

I don't know about that, in my setup, after it spends reasoning budget, it just starts thinking the same way but in plain output stream. This model looooves to yap. Still impressive for its size

Let me clarify one thing:

As I said, I didn't give the model any super heavy tasks; but it's genuinely impressive that a small model is aware — for example, catching the cases of an enum that was defined elsewhere under a different name, and instead of just creating a brand-new enum, it uses the question tool to ask for my opinion. That's really cool.

Basically, what I meant was that its behavior felt like a +100B model, not necessarily its problem-solving ability.

The second thing is that the code it writes is almost always complete and free of syntax errors. Same-weight models tend to have a common flaw — they deliver code with syntax mistakes or incomplete — which this model didn't seem to have.

Sign up or log in to comment