Datasets:
|
Download README.md from AmiriHayes/sae_token_programs: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 2.38 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/AmiriHayes/sae_token_programs/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/AmiriHayes/sae_token_programs/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/AmiriHayes/sae_token_programs/resolve/main/README.md
2.38 kB
metadata
license: mit
task_categories:
- feature-extraction
tags:
- interpretability
- sparse-autoencoder
- gpt2
- program-synthesis
Programs for GPT-2 SAE features
A readable Python program for each of 301,090 SAE features of GPT-2 small —
all 13 gpt2-small-res-jb checkpoints (blocks.0-11.hook_resid_pre plus
blocks.11.hook_resid_post), 24,576 features each.
Each program is an ordinary function that takes the tokens seen so far and returns whether that feature fires:
def prog_L06F08045(input_tokens):
"""3 token families, 4 surface forms (train F1 of the uncapped optimum: 0.958)."""
fire = {
' George', 'George', # george (3,592 firings)
' Osama', # osama (214 firings)
'ORGE', # orge (28 firings)
}
return ('george-family', 1) if input_tokens[-1] in fire else ('no match', 0)
Fitted on 289,658 OpenWebText sequences (36,786,566 read positions), scored on a structurally disjoint 10,000-sequence test split. No LLM was used to write these — the token sets are chosen by greedy marginal F1.
Layout
| path | what |
|---|---|
programs/layer{00..12}/ |
the programs, 100 per file, in thousand-blocks |
scores/layer{00..12}.csv |
per-feature test F1, precision, recall, token count |
synthesis_attempt_1/ |
387 LLM-written layer-6 programs — an earlier attempt, kept for comparison |
activation_value_program/ |
one program that predicts the activation value, not just whether it fires |
Results
Median test F1 by layer, and the single best program in each:
| L0 | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | L8 | L9 | L10 | L11 | L12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| median | .98 | .86 | .80 | .73 | .65 | .55 | .41 | .30 | .23 | .19 | .17 | .14 | .13 |
| best | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | .98 | .99 | .97 | .96 | .95 | .95 | .94 | .93 | .90 |
The median falls steeply with depth while the best barely moves. Depth doesn't cap what a token-only rule can reach — it changes how many features are reachable by one.
Caveats
scores/reports test F1; the docstring inside each program reports the train optimum. They are different numbers.- Layers 0–3 have fewer than 24,576 programs because some features fire only at position 0 (attention-sink features) and are excluded from fitting.