Datasets:
Download selection/choose_fire_set.py from AmiriHayes/sae_token_programs: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 4.4 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/AmiriHayes/sae_token_programs/resolve/main/selection/choose_fire_set.py
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/AmiriHayes/sae_token_programs/selection/choose_fire_set.py
-
curl -L -o choose_fire_set.py https://huggingface.co/datasets/AmiriHayes/sae_token_programs/resolve/main/selection/choose_fire_set.py
4.4 kB
| """How each program's fire set is chosen. No LLM, no gradients, no search. | |
| Every program in this dataset has the same shape: | |
| fire = {' George', 'George', ' Osama', 'ORGE'} | |
| return 1 if input_tokens[-1] in fire else 0 | |
| so building one comes down to a single question: WHICH tokens go in the set? | |
| `choose_fire_set` below is the step that answers it. | |
| Start from an empty set. Repeatedly try adding every token that is not in the | |
| set yet, and keep whichever one raises the F1 of the WHOLE SET the most. Stop | |
| as soon as no single token improves it, or once the set is full. | |
| For the George feature this runs: | |
| add ' George' -> F1 0.877 | |
| add 'George' -> F1 0.927 | |
| add ' Osama' -> F1 0.954 | |
| add 'ORGE' -> F1 0.958 | |
| nothing else helps, so stop with four tokens. | |
| This is NOT the same as taking the most frequent tokens in order. At each step | |
| every remaining candidate is re-scored, and the winner is usually not the next | |
| most frequent one -- across layer-6 features it differs 98.7% of the time. A | |
| token that fires 531 times out of 2,227 appearances loses to one that fires | |
| 142 times out of 145, because the first drags in 1,696 false positives. | |
| Everything here is measured on the TRAINING corpus. The test split is touched | |
| once, at the very end, to score the finished program. | |
| TWO SMALL STEPS COME AFTER THIS ONE, so the set you get from `choose_fire_set` | |
| alone is not always byte-identical to the shipped program: | |
| * other spellings of a chosen word are added where they help | |
| (' George' is chosen, so 'George' and 'GEORGE' are considered too) | |
| * word families contributing under 0.25% of the feature's firings are | |
| dropped, since one or two firings is not evidence of anything | |
| For the George feature that second step is why `choose_fire_set` returns a | |
| fifth token, 'Americ', that the shipped program does not have: it scraped a | |
| hair above zero gain here and was pruned as a tail family afterwards. Both | |
| steps live in `fit_programs.py`. | |
| """ | |
| from typing import List | |
| import numpy as np | |
| def choose_fire_set(token_stats: List[dict], total_firings: int, | |
| max_tokens: int = 50) -> List[str]: | |
| """Pick the tokens that go in one feature's fire set. | |
| token_stats | |
| One dict per token the feature was ever seen firing on: | |
| 'token' the token itself, e.g. ' George' | |
| 'fires' times the feature fired on it (3,249) | |
| 'occurrences' times the token appeared at all (3,249) | |
| `occurrences - fires` is how often the token showed up WITHOUT the | |
| feature firing, i.e. the false positives it would cost us. This is why | |
| we need the corpus occurrence count and not just the firing count. | |
| total_firings | |
| How many times the feature fires anywhere in the corpus. Firings not | |
| covered by the chosen tokens are the false negatives. | |
| max_tokens | |
| Size limit on the set, so the printed program stays readable. 50 is | |
| what this dataset used. | |
| Returns the chosen tokens, in the order they were added. | |
| """ | |
| if not token_stats or total_firings <= 0 or max_tokens <= 0: | |
| return [] | |
| tokens = [t["token"] for t in token_stats] | |
| fires = np.array([t["fires"] for t in token_stats], dtype=np.float64) | |
| occurrences = np.array([t["occurrences"] for t in token_stats], dtype=np.float64) | |
| chosen: List[int] = [] | |
| still_available = np.ones(len(token_stats), dtype=bool) | |
| true_pos = false_pos = 0.0 | |
| best_f1_so_far = 0.0 | |
| for _ in range(min(max_tokens, len(token_stats))): | |
| # if we added each candidate to the set, what would the set score? | |
| new_true_pos = true_pos + fires | |
| new_false_pos = false_pos + (occurrences - fires) | |
| false_neg = total_firings - new_true_pos | |
| f1 = np.where( | |
| new_true_pos > 0, | |
| 2 * new_true_pos / (2 * new_true_pos + new_false_pos + false_neg), | |
| 0.0, | |
| ) | |
| f1[~still_available] = -1.0 # already in the set | |
| best = int(np.argmax(f1)) | |
| if f1[best] <= best_f1_so_far: | |
| break # nothing left that helps | |
| best_f1_so_far = float(f1[best]) | |
| true_pos = float(new_true_pos[best]) | |
| false_pos = float(new_false_pos[best]) | |
| still_available[best] = False | |
| chosen.append(best) | |
| return [tokens[i] for i in chosen] | |