Datasets:
address string | code string | labels list | binary_label int64 | n_positive_categories int64 | label_vector list |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0x50987e6be405ebac691f8988304562e5efc3b2ea | // File: zeppelin-solidity/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20Basic.sol
pragma solidity ^0.4.21;
/**
* @title ERC20Basic
* @dev Simpler version of ERC20 interface
* @dev see https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/179
*/
contract ERC20Basic {
function totalSupply() public view returns (uint256);
function balanceOf(a... | [
"arithmetic"
] | 1 | 1 | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
0xaf31604f0a88f7fcebc7d4cf4dd14653f4a6773c | pragma solidity ^0.4.13;
contract Token {
uint256 public totalSupply;
function balanceOf(address _owner) constant returns (uint256 balance);
function transfer(address _to, uint256 _value) returns (bool success);
function transferFrom(address _from, address _to, uint256 _value) returns (bool success);
... | [
"arithmetic",
"reentrancy"
] | 1 | 2 | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0
] |
0xb81292a2e046e44121dfbfba398b19f5910faf60 | pragma solidity ^0.4.25;
contract Token {
/* This is a slight change to the ERC20 base standard.
function totalSupply() constant returns (uint256 supply);
is replaced with:
uint256 public totalSupply;
This automatically creates a getter function for the totalSupply.
This is moved to the base co... | [
"arithmetic"
] | 1 | 1 | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
0xf4a3679eb0a3d9e8af9824a29bd32dd98d1e7127 | pragma solidity ^0.4.25;
contract IStdToken {
function balanceOf(address _owner) public view returns (uint256);
function transfer(address _to, uint256 _value) public returns (bool);
function transferFrom(address _from, address _to, uint256 _value) public returns(bool);
}
contract EtheramaCommon {
... | [
"arithmetic"
] | 1 | 1 | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
0xa4cc3648dba1396a2a455486b408ef4402c3a966 | pragma solidity ^0.4.15;
// ================= Ownable Contract start =============================
/*
* Ownable
*
* Base contract with an owner.
* Provides onlyOwner modifier, which prevents function from running if it is called by anyone other than the owner.
*/
contract Ownable {
address public owner;
func... | [
"arithmetic"
] | 1 | 1 | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
0x7114e6abb99b00f3255767f4a409e5f5be3b8b83 | pragma solidity ^0.4.21;
library BWUtility {
// -------- UTILITY FUNCTIONS ----------
// Return next higher even _multiple for _amount parameter (e.g used to round up to even finneys).
function ceil(uint _amount, uint _multiple) pure public returns (uint) {
return ((_amount + _multiple - 1) ... | [
"Other",
"arithmetic",
"denial_service"
] | 1 | 3 | [
1,
0,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
0x18a27a0e42d02d88ea2800ffe3bf094fb2de3e53 | pragma solidity 0.4.21;
// File: contracts/ExchangeHandler.sol
/// @title Interface for all exchange handler contracts
interface ExchangeHandler {
/// @dev Get the available amount left to fill for an order
/// @param orderAddresses Array of address values needed for this DEX order
/// @param orderValues... | [] | 0 | 0 | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
0xe65702283f5773e7e0f6bdd3594f502241676f1a | pragma solidity ^0.4.13;
library SafeMath {
/**
* @dev Multiplies two numbers, throws on overflow.
*/
function mul(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256 c) {
if (a == 0) {
return 0;
}
c = a * b;
assert(c / a == b);
return c;
}
/**
* @dev Integer division of two ... | [
"arithmetic",
"time_manipulation"
] | 1 | 2 | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0
] |
0xff531d7874cab51b2661d6599d5f552edae3481e | pragma solidity ^0.4.23;
contract CoinCj // @eachvar
{
// ======== 初始化代币相关逻辑 ==============
// 地址信息
address public admin_address = 0x587b13913F4c708A4F033318056E4b6BA956A6F5; // @eachvar
address public account_address = 0xf988dC2F225C64CcdeA064Dad60DD4A95776f483; // @eachvar 初始化后转入代币的地址
// 定义账... | [
"arithmetic"
] | 1 | 1 | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
0x1d9bfbc9f1616dbdf5946ae95d075ce7f87d24d3 | pragma solidity >=0.4.22 <0.6.0;
interface tokenRecipient {
function receiveApproval(address _from, uint256 _value, address _token, bytes _extraData) external;
}
contract MUTOToken {
// Public variables of the token
string public name;
string public symbol;
uint8 public decimals = 18;
// 18 ... | [
"arithmetic"
] | 1 | 1 | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
0xdc7f41f9e8ba6de05ed5cefa74fb57e82cfb038e | pragma solidity ^0.4.18;
contract ERC20Basic {
uint256 public totalSupply;
function balanceOf(address who) public constant returns (uint256);
function transfer(address to, uint256 value) public returns (bool);
event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);
}
contract ERC20 is ERC20Ba... | [
"arithmetic",
"reentrancy",
"unchecked_low_calls"
] | 1 | 3 | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
1,
0,
1
] |
Vultrix SmartBugs processed
44,589 real Ethereum smart contracts (Solidity source code), each labelled with up to 8 vulnerability types. It was used to train Arshit1616/vultrix-multilabel-v2.
Project code (including the training script): github.com/Arshit-Verma/Vultrix
This is a processed version of the public SmartBugs dataset. The contracts come from SmartBugs Wild, and the labels from SmartBugs results: what 9 automated analysis tools reported for each contract.
How the labels were made
The 9 tools are Slither, Mythril, Oyente, Osiris, SmartCheck, Securify, HoneyBadger, Maian and Manticore. Their findings are grouped into categories.
A contract gets a label when at least 2 different tools report that category.
metadata.json records this as "min_tool_consensus": 2.
Example: if Slither and SmartCheck both report reentrancy, the contract is labelled reentrancy. If only Oyente reports arithmetic, it isn't labelled arithmetic.
So the labels mean "at least two automated tools would flag this". They aren't the result of a human audit.
Splits and labels
| Label | Train | Validation | Test |
|---|---|---|---|
Other |
5,381 | 675 | 628 |
access_control |
512 | 56 | 72 |
arithmetic |
21,423 | 2,687 | 2,680 |
denial_service |
2,166 | 281 | 282 |
front_running |
845 | 109 | 117 |
reentrancy |
4,306 | 529 | 545 |
time_manipulation |
716 | 85 | 100 |
unchecked_low_calls |
956 | 102 | 116 |
| no label (clean) | 9,654 | 1,207 | 1,207 |
| contracts | 35,671 | 4,459 | 4,459 |
About 73% of contracts have at least one label. The labels are very unbalanced: arithmetic is on about 60% of contracts, access_control on 1.4%.
Fields
One JSON object per line:
| Field | Type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
address |
string | Ethereum contract address |
code |
string | Full Solidity source (Unix line endings) |
labels |
list of strings | Label names, e.g. ["Other", "arithmetic"] |
binary_label |
int | 1 if the contract has any label |
n_positive_categories |
int | Number of labels |
label_vector |
list of 8 ints | 0/1 per label, in the order of the table above (and metadata.json) |
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("Arshit1616/vultrix-smartbugs-processed")
print(ds["test"][0]["labels"])
Things to know
- Old Solidity: the contracts are from 2019 and mostly Solidity 0.4.x.
- Not every SmartBugs contract is here. SmartBugs Wild has 47,398 contracts and this set has 44,589. 67 had no tool results; why the other ≈ 2,740 were left out isn't recorded.
- The split can't be recreated. It was random, and its seed isn't recorded.
- Duplicates: a small number of training contracts (138) share their code with validation or test contracts when comments and whitespace are ignored. The Vultrix model's training removed them.
Credits and licence
- Licence: Apache-2.0, the same as the source data. Each contract's source code keeps its original licence, as published on Etherscan.
- Source: SmartBugs Wild and SmartBugs results, Apache-2.0.
- Paper: Durieux, Ferreira, Abreu, Cruz, Empirical Review of Automated Analysis Tools on 47,587 Ethereum Smart Contracts, ICSE 2020.
- Changes from the original: contracts and tool results were combined into one file per split, labels were derived with the 2-tools rule above, and the data was split 80 / 10 / 10.
- Downloads last month
- 64