kaldan's picture
Upload 2 files
e1a99c3 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
2.15 kB

Bo Metadata Benchmark

This benchmark evaluates how well large language models extract bibliographic metadata from Tibetan texts when given only a segment of the work (Text Head and Text Last), not the full text.

The model is expected to recover fields such as titles, authors, translators, revisors, scribes, revealers, publisher, date, and place from those windows.

The published file is benchmark_dataset.csv (699 rows).

Collections

Collection Texts Share
Tengyur (Derge) 500 71.5%
Terzod (Rinchen Terzod) 100 14.3%
Shangpa 99 14.2%
Total 699 100%

Metadata coverage

Counts are records with a non-empty value. Unique counts treat the full field string as one value (comma-separated names are not split).

Field Records Unique values Tengyur Terzod Shangpa
Tibetan title 698 (99.9%) 698 499 100 99
Sanskrit title 421 (60.2%) 420 379 20 22
Alternative titles 406 (58.1%) 406 284 73 49
Authors 453 (64.8%) 417 340 52 61
Translator / pandita 246 (35.2%) 203 231 6 9
Translators 313 (44.8%) 222 287 7 19
Revisor 56 (8.0%) 51 32 9 15
Scribe 70 (10.0%) 63 20 39 11
Revealers 52 (7.4%) 44 0 51 1
Publisher 3 (0.4%) 3 0 1 2
Date 65 (9.3%) 65 24 22 19
Place 176 (25.2%) 174 90 49 37

Every row has collection, File name, Text Head, and Text Last. One Tengyur row has no Tibetan title.

Dataset origin

  • Tengyur (Derge). Manually annotated as part of the ATII project.
  • Shangpa. Post-correction of Gemini zero-shot inference. The texts are mainly from the Kagyu lineage.
  • Terzod. Also post-corrected Gemini output. The texts are from the Rinchen Terzod.

Credits

This dataset was developed by Dharmaduta from specifications provided by the Buddhist Digital Resource Center (BDRC) for the BDRC Etext Corpus, with funding from the Khyentse Foundation.