The dataset viewer is not available because its heuristics could not detect any supported data files. You can try uploading some data files, or configuring the data files location manually.
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
Tibetan FormatEval Benchmark — public 1,418-sample snapshot
This directory contains four aligned JSONL evaluation formats. Each file has
1,418 records in the same order and uses the same id values.
The public records retain dataset, subject, coarse domain, question, options, answer indices, gold answer text, and open-answer aliases. Internal source lineage and sample-split fields are intentionally omitted.
Files:
main.jsonl: combined 4-way and 10-way representation.mcqa_4way.jsonl: four-choice multiple-choice evaluation format.mcqa_10way.jsonl: ten-choice multiple-choice evaluation format.open_short_answer.jsonl: open-answer evaluation format.
Evaluation scripts
The scripts/ directory contains standard-library-only Python 3.10+ tools for
running an OpenAI-compatible model endpoint, scoring one model's predictions,
and summarizing format-validity results across models.
Generate predictions
run_openai_compatible_eval.py accepts either the 4-way or 10-way JSONL file
with --task mcqa, or the open-answer file with --task open:
python scripts/run_openai_compatible_eval.py \
--gold mcqa_4way.jsonl \
--task mcqa \
--model YOUR_MODEL_NAME \
--base-url https://YOUR_ENDPOINT/v1 \
--api-key "$API_KEY" \
--output predictions/YOUR_MODEL_NAME/mcqa_4way.jsonl \
--concurrency 1
The runner writes resumable prediction JSONL records with the schema
{"id": "...", "prediction": "..."} plus model and request metadata. Use
an environment variable or a private --shell-file for credentials; do not
commit keys to the repository.
Score predictions
evaluate_predictions.py supports letter/index MCQA predictions and normalized
open short answers. It writes both a summary JSON and a matching
.per_item.jsonl file:
python scripts/evaluate_predictions.py \
--gold mcqa_4way.jsonl \
--predictions predictions/YOUR_MODEL_NAME/mcqa_4way.jsonl \
--task mcqa4 \
--output results/YOUR_MODEL_NAME/mcqa_4way.json
python scripts/evaluate_predictions.py \
--gold mcqa_10way.jsonl \
--predictions predictions/YOUR_MODEL_NAME/mcqa_10way.jsonl \
--task mcqa10 \
--output results/YOUR_MODEL_NAME/mcqa_10way.json
python scripts/evaluate_predictions.py \
--gold open_short_answer.jsonl \
--predictions predictions/YOUR_MODEL_NAME/open_short_answer.jsonl \
--task open \
--output results/YOUR_MODEL_NAME/open_short_answer.json
Compare multiple models
After each model has the three scored summaries and per-item files under its own result directory, run:
python scripts/analyze_format_validity.py \
--result-root results \
--output results/format_validity_summary.json
- Downloads last month
- 31