Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
regulation
stringclasses
3 values
category
stringlengths
7
26
entity_or_product_type
stringlengths
5
258
scope_note
stringclasses
10 values
legal_basis
stringclasses
10 values
supervisory_authority_note
stringclasses
10 values
NIS2
essential_entity_sector
Energy (electricity, district heating/cooling, oil, gas, hydrogen)
Annex I sector. Generally an 'essential entity' if large (250+ staff or >50M EUR turnover/43M EUR balance sheet); some sub-types (qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers) are in scope regardless of size.
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex I
Luxembourg: ILR is the national competent/supervisory authority (per Devseis's understanding of the national transposition -- verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
essential_entity_sector
Transport (air, rail, water, road)
Annex I sector. Generally an 'essential entity' if large (250+ staff or >50M EUR turnover/43M EUR balance sheet); some sub-types (qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers) are in scope regardless of size.
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex I
Luxembourg: ILR is the national competent/supervisory authority (per Devseis's understanding of the national transposition -- verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
essential_entity_sector
Banking
Annex I sector. Generally an 'essential entity' if large (250+ staff or >50M EUR turnover/43M EUR balance sheet); some sub-types (qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers) are in scope regardless of size.
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex I
Luxembourg: ILR is the national competent/supervisory authority (per Devseis's understanding of the national transposition -- verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
essential_entity_sector
Financial market infrastructures
Annex I sector. Generally an 'essential entity' if large (250+ staff or >50M EUR turnover/43M EUR balance sheet); some sub-types (qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers) are in scope regardless of size.
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex I
Luxembourg: ILR is the national competent/supervisory authority (per Devseis's understanding of the national transposition -- verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
essential_entity_sector
Health (care providers, EU reference labs, pharma R&D/manufacture)
Annex I sector. Generally an 'essential entity' if large (250+ staff or >50M EUR turnover/43M EUR balance sheet); some sub-types (qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers) are in scope regardless of size.
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex I
Luxembourg: ILR is the national competent/supervisory authority (per Devseis's understanding of the national transposition -- verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
essential_entity_sector
Drinking water
Annex I sector. Generally an 'essential entity' if large (250+ staff or >50M EUR turnover/43M EUR balance sheet); some sub-types (qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers) are in scope regardless of size.
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex I
Luxembourg: ILR is the national competent/supervisory authority (per Devseis's understanding of the national transposition -- verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
essential_entity_sector
Waste water
Annex I sector. Generally an 'essential entity' if large (250+ staff or >50M EUR turnover/43M EUR balance sheet); some sub-types (qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers) are in scope regardless of size.
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex I
Luxembourg: ILR is the national competent/supervisory authority (per Devseis's understanding of the national transposition -- verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
essential_entity_sector
Digital infrastructure (IXPs, DNS/TLD, cloud, data centres, CDNs, trust services, public e-comms)
Annex I sector. Generally an 'essential entity' if large (250+ staff or >50M EUR turnover/43M EUR balance sheet); some sub-types (qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers) are in scope regardless of size.
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex I
Luxembourg: ILR is the national competent/supervisory authority (per Devseis's understanding of the national transposition -- verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
essential_entity_sector
ICT service management (managed service & managed security service providers)
Annex I sector. Generally an 'essential entity' if large (250+ staff or >50M EUR turnover/43M EUR balance sheet); some sub-types (qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers) are in scope regardless of size.
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex I
Luxembourg: ILR is the national competent/supervisory authority (per Devseis's understanding of the national transposition -- verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
essential_entity_sector
Public administration (central government; regional at Member State discretion)
Annex I sector. Generally an 'essential entity' if large (250+ staff or >50M EUR turnover/43M EUR balance sheet); some sub-types (qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers) are in scope regardless of size.
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex I
Luxembourg: ILR is the national competent/supervisory authority (per Devseis's understanding of the national transposition -- verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
essential_entity_sector
Space
Annex I sector. Generally an 'essential entity' if large (250+ staff or >50M EUR turnover/43M EUR balance sheet); some sub-types (qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers) are in scope regardless of size.
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex I
Luxembourg: ILR is the national competent/supervisory authority (per Devseis's understanding of the national transposition -- verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
important_entity_sector
Postal and courier services
Annex II sector. Generally an 'important entity' if at least medium-sized (50+ staff or >10M EUR turnover/balance sheet).
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex II
Luxembourg: ILR (verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
important_entity_sector
Waste management
Annex II sector. Generally an 'important entity' if at least medium-sized (50+ staff or >10M EUR turnover/balance sheet).
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex II
Luxembourg: ILR (verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
important_entity_sector
Manufacture, production and distribution of chemicals
Annex II sector. Generally an 'important entity' if at least medium-sized (50+ staff or >10M EUR turnover/balance sheet).
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex II
Luxembourg: ILR (verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
important_entity_sector
Production, processing and distribution of food
Annex II sector. Generally an 'important entity' if at least medium-sized (50+ staff or >10M EUR turnover/balance sheet).
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex II
Luxembourg: ILR (verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
important_entity_sector
Manufacturing (medical devices, electronics, electrical equipment, machinery, motor vehicles, other transport equipment)
Annex II sector. Generally an 'important entity' if at least medium-sized (50+ staff or >10M EUR turnover/balance sheet).
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex II
Luxembourg: ILR (verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
important_entity_sector
Digital providers (online marketplaces, online search engines, social networking platforms)
Annex II sector. Generally an 'important entity' if at least medium-sized (50+ staff or >10M EUR turnover/balance sheet).
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex II
Luxembourg: ILR (verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
important_entity_sector
Research organisations
Annex II sector. Generally an 'important entity' if at least medium-sized (50+ staff or >10M EUR turnover/balance sheet).
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Annex II
Luxembourg: ILR (verify current text, see note below).
NIS2
size_threshold_rule
General size-cap rule (both Annexes)
Micro and small enterprises (<50 staff AND <=10M EUR turnover/balance sheet) are generally OUT of scope, subject to named size-independent exceptions.
Art. 2
Applies EU-wide; Member States can extend scope nationally.
NIS2
size_independent_exception
Sole provider of a service in a Member State; entity whose disruption could have significant public-safety/health impact; entity identified as critical by a Member State; public administration; qualified trust service providers, TLD registries, DNS providers
In scope REGARDLESS of size.
Art. 2(2)-(4)
Case-by-case; check Member State's own critical-entity designations.
DORA
financial_entity
Credit institutions
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Payment institutions (incl. exempt under PSD2 Art. 32)
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Electronic money institutions
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Investment firms
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Crypto-asset service providers & issuers of asset-referenced tokens
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Central securities depositories
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Central counterparties
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Trading venues
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Trade repositories
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Managers of alternative investment funds
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Management companies (UCITS)
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Data reporting service providers
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Insurance and reinsurance undertakings
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Insurance intermediaries, reinsurance intermediaries, ancillary insurance intermediaries
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Institutions for occupational retirement provision
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Credit rating agencies
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Administrators of critical benchmarks
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Crowdfunding service providers
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
financial_entity
Securitisation repositories
In scope as a 'financial entity' under DORA's ICT risk-management, incident-reporting, resilience-testing and third-party-risk rules. A simplified regime exists for some small/non-interconnected entities.
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Art. 2
Luxembourg: CSSF supervises financial entities; CSSF also directly oversees 'critical' ICT third-party providers designated at EU level.
DORA
ict_third_party_provider
ICT third-party service provider to a financial entity (e.g. cloud, SaaS, hosting, data analytics)
In scope indirectly: financial-entity clients must risk-manage the relationship (contracts, exit strategy, concentration risk). If designated 'critical' by the European Supervisory Authorities, the provider is directly overseen.
Art. 28-44
Critical ICT third-party providers: direct EU-level oversight (Lead Overseer); in Luxembourg, CSSF is the relevant national authority for coordination.
CRA
default
Any product with digital elements with a direct or indirect data/network connection to a device or network (most consumer & general-purpose hardware/software)
Manufacturers must meet essential cybersecurity requirements (Annex I), provide security updates for the support period, and (for important/critical) may need third-party conformity assessment rather than self-assessment.
Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, Art. 6-8 & Annexes
CE marking required; national market surveillance authority enforces.
CRA
important_class_i
Products such as identity/access management software, browsers, password managers, network management software, SIEM systems, boot managers, VPNs (lower-risk 'important' tier)
Manufacturers must meet essential cybersecurity requirements (Annex I), provide security updates for the support period, and (for important/critical) may need third-party conformity assessment rather than self-assessment.
Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, Art. 6-8 & Annexes
CE marking required; national market surveillance authority enforces.
CRA
important_class_ii
Products such as firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems, tamper-resistant microprocessors, smart-card readers (higher-risk 'important' tier)
Manufacturers must meet essential cybersecurity requirements (Annex I), provide security updates for the support period, and (for important/critical) may need third-party conformity assessment rather than self-assessment.
Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, Art. 6-8 & Annexes
CE marking required; national market surveillance authority enforces.
CRA
critical
Products such as hardware security modules, smart meter gateways, smartcards/secure elements used for critical infrastructure (subject to third-party conformity assessment)
Manufacturers must meet essential cybersecurity requirements (Annex I), provide security updates for the support period, and (for important/critical) may need third-party conformity assessment rather than self-assessment.
Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, Art. 6-8 & Annexes
CE marking required; national market surveillance authority enforces.
CRA
exclusion
SaaS (unless it is a remote data-processing solution that is part of a product's essential digital functions)
Generally OUT of scope of the CRA itself -- but SaaS vendors should still check whether the underlying product they operate is in scope, and note GDPR/NIS2/DORA may apply separately.
Recital / Art. 3 scope discussion
Verify against current guidance -- SaaS/CRA boundary has been a point of ongoing clarification.
CRA
exclusion
Open-source software NOT supplied in the course of a commercial activity
Generally OUT of scope, though a 'steward' of widely-used open-source software can have lighter-touch obligations if it is commercially exploited by others.
Art. 3, Recitals on open source
Case-by-case -- depends on funding model and commercial exploitation.
CRA
exclusion
Products already regulated under sector-specific EU law (medical devices, aviation, motor vehicles, marine equipment)
OUT of scope of CRA to avoid duplicating existing sectoral cybersecurity/safety regimes.
Art. 2(6)-(9)
Confirm which sectoral regime applies instead.

NIS2 / DORA / CRA Applicability Reference

A structured reference table for determining which of the EU's three major cybersecurity regulations — NIS2 (Directive (EU) 2022/2555), DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554), and the Cyber Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/2847) — applies to an organisation or product, based on sector, entity type, or product category.

Compiled by Devseis, a Luxembourg cybersecurity, data protection and AI governance consultancy, from the regulations' own text (NIS2 Annexes I/II and Article 2, DORA Article 2 and Articles 28-44, CRA Articles 2-8 and Annexes).

⚠️ Not legal advice — two specific caveats

  1. General reference only. Applicability depends on exact entity size, activities, and Member State transposition — always verify against the current consolidated text for your specific situation.
  2. Luxembourg-specific notes are unverified. Rows referencing the Luxembourg NIS2 transposition law (dated 5 May 2026) and ILR/CSSF supervisory roles were not independently re-verified against the current text at time of writing — confirm directly with ILR (nis2.lu) / CSSF before relying on them.

Columns

Column Description
regulation NIS2 / DORA / CRA
category Sector/entity/product classification within that regulation
entity_or_product_type The specific type covered
scope_note Applicability conditions (size thresholds, exceptions)
legal_basis Article/Annex citation
supervisory_authority_note Relevant regulator, where known

License

CC-BY-4.0 — compiled from public regulatory text.

Downloads last month
31

Collection including Devseis/nis2-dora-cra-applicability